Cyber-Duty of Care: Kerangka Hukum Pertanggungjawaban Lembaga Arbitrase Internasional atas Pelanggaran Keamanan Data dalam Persidangan Virtual di Indonesia Cyber-Duty of Care: Legal Framework for the Liability of International Arbitration Institutions for Data Security Breaches in Virtual Hearings in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
2101-2132
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10266
Viewed: 40 times
Downloaded: 25 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Afandono Cahyo Putranto1*, Fakhrul Ardiyan2, Irvandi Irvandi3, Riski Ari Wibowo4, Diani Sadiawati5 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The increasing adoption of virtual conferencing technology after the COVID-19 pandemic has encouraged the use of online hearings in arbitration proceedings, while also giving rise to risks of confidential data leakage and cybersecurity breaches in transnational commercial disputes. This study aims to analyze the legal framework for the liability of international arbitration institutions for data security breaches in virtual hearings in Indonesia and to reconstruct relevant legal doctrines for the national arbitration regime. This study uses a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches based on functional comparison. The results show that there is no legally binding standardization of cybersecurity protocols for international arbitration institutions in Indonesia, unlike Singapore and the United Kingdom, which already have more comprehensive regulatory frameworks. In addition, the construction of arbitral civil liability in the Indonesian legal system remains fragmented and has not been able to address losses resulting from data breaches in transnational commercial disputes. The conclusion of this study affirms the need to reconstruct the concept of Cyber-Duty of Care as a new legal doctrine in the Indonesian arbitration regime that systematically integrates the principles of personal data protection, cybersecurity standards, and arbitral civil liability. These findings provide a theoretical contribution to the development of arbitration law and data protection in virtual hearings, as well as practical implications for policymakers and arbitration institutions in strengthening data security protocols in international arbitration proceedings in Indonesia.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Anissa, S., & Multazam, M. T. (2024). Assessing legal measures for addressing personal data misuse in commercial settings: A critical analysis. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v19i2.1012
Anjheli, D. (2024). Privasi Digital dan Kejahatan Phishing di Indonesia: Evaluasi Kritis terhadap Efektivitas UU ITE dan UU PDP. Staatsrecht: Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik Islam, 4(1), 165–189. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/syariah/Staatsrecht/article/view/3964
Appleton, B. (2026). Arbitration hacked: Toward a unified cybersecurity and data breach framework for international arbitral proceedings. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6625218
Argiansyah, H. Y., & Prawira, M. R. Y. (2024). Analisis Hukum Hak atas Privasi dan Perlindungan Data Pribadi Berdasarkan Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Hukum Pelita, 5(1), 61–75.
Ashady, S., Grindulu, L., Islam, M. H., & Zainuddin, M. (2024). Perkembangan Regulasi dan Pelaksanaan Mediasi pada Persidangan Secara Elektronik Pasca Berlakunya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2022. CERMIN: Jurnal Penelitian, 8(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.36841/cermin_unars.v8i1.4152
Basedow, J., Dietze, J., Griller, S., Kellerbauer, M., Klamert, M., Malferrari, L., Scharf, T., Schnichels, D., Thym, D., & Tomkin, J. (2021). European integration: Quo vadis? A critical commentary on the PSPP judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court of May 5, 2020. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 19(1), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moab017
Bintarawati, F. (2024). The influence of the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP) on law enforcement in the digital era. ANAYASA: Journal of Legal Studies, 1(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.61397/ays.v1i2.92
Brantes, F. D., Giovannini, C., Gromova, E. A., & Ferreira, J. B. (2023). Arbitration chambers and technology: Witness tampering and perceived effectiveness in videoconferenced dispute resolution proceedings. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 31(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaad012
CNN Indonesia. (2023, May 22). Kominfo Klarifikasi Soal Dugaan Bocoran Data BSI yang Beredar. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20230522122857-192-952382/kominfo-klarifikasi-soal-dugaan-bocoran-data-bsi-yang-beredar
Demirer, M., Jiménez Hernández, D., Li, D., & Peng, S. (2024). Data, privacy laws and firm production: Evidence from the GDPR (NBER Working Paper No. 32146). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w32146
Dmytro, P.-T., Volodymyr, S., Vitaliy, D., Yevheniy, R., & Volodymyr, M. (2025). Legal framework for cybersecurity in the context of the metaverse formation. Metaverse Science, Society and Law, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.69635/mssl.2025.1.1.18
Egan, M., & Yu, H.-L. (2022). Intersecting and dissecting confidentiality and data protection in online arbitration. Journal of Business Law, 2022(2), 135–163. https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/handle/1893/31758
Ehnts, D. (2024). Quo vadis, Schuldenbremse? Über Sinn und Unsinn detaillierter Defizit-und Schuldenregelungen im Grundgesetz. Wirtschaftsdienst, 104(1), 25–28.
Farid, A. S. (2025). Wacana Kritis Media Online terhadap Koperasi Merah Putih sebagai Proyek Ekonomi Politik Pembangunan Desa. Jurnal Syiar-Syiar, 5(1), 57–75.
Febriani, H., Agustina, I., Monica, S., & Adiyanto, M. R. (2023). Property rights, definition and infringement of trademarks and trade secret rights: Literature review. Proceeding International Conference on Economy, Management, and Business, 1(1), 198–207.
Ferreira, D. B., Giovannini, C., Gromova, E. A., & Ferreira, J. B. (2023). Arbitration chambers and technology: Witness tampering and perceived effectiveness in videoconferenced dispute resolution proceedings. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 31(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaad012
Gidron, T., & Volovelsky, U. (2022). How related are the Scottish snail of 1926 and the Israeli decomposed snail of 2022: Is Donoghue v Stevenson still relevant in 21st century law? In Donoghue v Stevenson—The Immortal Snail—90th Anniversary Conference Papers. The Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia.
Gordon, E. (2026). The doctrine of privity in negligence: Understanding the path to Donoghue v Stevenson. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hardjomuljadi, S. (2026). Pertanggungjawaban Etik Arbiter dan Implikasinya terhadap Kekuatan Putusan Arbitrase di Indonesia. Journal of Syntax Literate, 11(1).
Hayward, B. (2025). Submission to the public consultation on the International Arbitration Act 1994 of Singapore and the international arbitration regime [Law reform submission].
Indonesia. (n.d.). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata) Pasal 1365 tentang Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH).
Iwanti, N. A. M., & Taun. (2022). Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi serta Upaya Hukum Wanprestasi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang yang Berlaku. The Juris, 6(2), 346–351. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v6i2.601
Łągiewska, M. (2024). Digitalization and the use of new technologies in international arbitration. Brill/Nijhoff.
Ling, D. T. C. (2022). Cybersecurity in international arbitration: An untapped opportunity for arbitral institutions. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 34, 432–463. https://journalsonline.academypublishing.org.sg/Journals/Singapore-Academy-of-Law-Journal/Current-Issue/ctl/eFirstSALPDFJournalView/mid/494/ArticleId/1783/Citation/JournalsOnlinePDF
Lorenza, A., Maharani, A. S., & Rioneldi. (n.d.). Implementasi dan Dampak bagi Advokat dalam Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Perkara secara Virtual. DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(1), 373650.
Mahpudin, M. (2021). Gowaslu sebagai Electoral Technology: Keterlibatan Publik dalam Pengawasan Partisipatif Berbasis Daring. Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu, 4(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v4i2.53
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.
Muñoz, E., & Barocio, P. M. (2026). Rethinking arbitrator immunity: The role of party-arbitrator agreements. Journal of International Arbitration, 43(2), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2026008
Natasha Dachi, F., & Urbanisasi. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Perdata dalam Transaksi Crypto Asset: Kajian terhadap Risiko Kerugian Investor. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 3(2), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v3i2.5638
Neelakantan, V., & Giorgadze, V. (2023). Emergency arbitration procedures under the rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC). BCDR International Arbitration Review, 10(2).
Pebrian, D., Amanita, A., & Ardan, R. A. R. (2025). Perbandingan Arbitrase SIAC dan BANI dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Berdasarkan Konvensi New York 1958. Rechtswetenschap: Jurnal Mahasiswa Hukum, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.36859/rechtswetenschap.v2i2.3484
Pramono, N. (2022). Perkembangan Hukum Kontrak di Era Digital. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 52(2), 145–162. https://jhp.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/1890
Rabbani, R. F., & Suherman, S. (2023). Urgensi Pengaturan Confidentiality Agreement sebagai Optimalisasi Perlindungan Kerahasiaan Informasi Bernilai Ekonomi. Jurnal USM Law Review, 6(3), 1020–1039. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.7830
Ramadhani, D. A. (2012). Wanprestasi dan Akibat Hukumnya. Jurnal Yuridis, 15(17).
Ratnasari, W. P. (2023). Industri Budaya dan Komoditas: Studi Kasus Tenun Tradisional Nusa Tenggara Barat sebagai Komoditas dan Seni dalam Kerangka Budaya dan Religi. Jurnal Kommunity Online, 3(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.15408/jko.v3i2.31027
Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Robinson, G. M., & Evely, A. C. (2010). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(8), 1766–1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023
Rianda, F. U. (2025). Urgensi Pengaturan Central Bank Digital Currency untuk Melindungi Data Pribadi dari Cybercrime di Indonesia [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim].
Risnain, M. (2018). Eksistensi Lembaga Quasi Judisial dalam Sistem Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia: Kajian terhadap Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 3(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.3.1.2014.49-58
Sachrudin, A., & Listyowati, P. R. (2021). Pandangan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Semarang terhadap Implementasi E-Court dalam Administrasi dan Proses Persidangan Perkara Perceraian. Prosiding Konstelasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Unissula (KIMU) Klaster Hukum, 580–598. https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/kimuh/article/view/11963
Savitri, Z. A., Amirulloh, M., & Susanto, M. (2025). Urgensi Sertifikat Keandalan Privasi dalam Menghadapi Kebocoran Data Pribadi. Jurnal USM Law Review, 8(1), 235–253. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i1.11385
Setiadi, R. B., Sahari, A., & Isnina, I. (2025). Penerapan Asas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Material dalam Perspektif Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Kejaksaan. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 6(1), 145–150. https://jurnal.bundamediagrup.co.id/index.php/iuris/article/view/850
Sihite, Y. A., & Marpaung, D. S. H. (2022). Efektivitas E-Court sebagai Sarana Penyelesaian Sengketa di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia. Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v5i1.2495
Sitorus, S. Y. H. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Data Pribadi Pengguna Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No. 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi [Thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia].
Tampubolon, W. S. (2019). Peranan Seorang Arbiter dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa melalui Arbitrase. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 7(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v7i1.242
Teramura, N., & Trakman, L. (2024). Confidentiality and privacy of arbitration in the digital era: Pies in the sky? Arbitration International, 40(3), 277–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiae017
Tian, Y. (2017). The impact of third-party funding on international arbitration procedures and regulatory recommendations [Doctoral dissertation, China University of Political Science and Law].
Wahanze, R. (2023). Examining the “neighbour principle” in Donoghue v Stevenson as a test for qualifying the duty of care element used in determining the liability of a defendant in negligent misstatements. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4612565
Zhou, W., Zhang, D., Han, G., Zhu, W., & Wang, X. (2023). A blockchain-based privacy-preserving and fair data transaction model in IoT. Applied Sciences, 13(22), Article 12389. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132212389