Deforestation Monitoring and Carbon Sequestration Remote Sensing Application
Main Article Content
Abstract
Management regimes and geographical variations in potential forest productivity significantly influence the dynamics of carbon sources and sinks. Spatially explicit data on land cover, stand age class, and harvesting practices can be effectively acquired through satellite remote sensing. When combined with regional climate records, carbon-cycle process models can estimate potential production rates and associated decomposition processes. This integration of remote sensing and modeling enables the generation of spatially explicit information on carbon storage and flux. Using this approach, carbon flow between 1992 and 1997 was analyzed across two 165 km² regions in western Oregon: the West Cascades and the Coast Range. The West Cascades study area, predominantly composed of less-productive public lands, experienced minimal harvesting during the 1990s, with only 1% of its land base harvested between 1991 and 2000. In contrast, the Coast Range study area, largely managed for timber production on private lands, saw 17% of its land base harvested during the same period. Despite hosting a substantial proportion of young, highly productive stands that acted as carbon sinks, the Coast Range's mean annual harvest removals exceeded its mean annual net ecosystem production. Conversely, the West Cascades region functioned as a net carbon sink. The spatially and temporally explicit nature of this integrated approach allows for detailed identification of the mechanisms driving carbon flux across forested landscapes.

Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Lessmann M, Ros GH, Young MD, de Vries W. Global variation in soil carbon sequestration potential through improved cropland management. Global Change Biology. 2022;28(3):1162-1177. Available:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi /abs/10.1111/gcb.15954
Arehart JH, Nelson WS, Srubar III WV. On the theoretical carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential of hempcrete. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;266:121846. Available:https://www.sciencedirect.com/sc ience/article/pii/S095965262031893X
Hammad HM, Nauman HMF, Abbas F, Ahmad A, Bakhat HF, Saeed S, Cerdà A. Carbon sequestration potential and soil characteristics of various land use systems in arid region. Journal of environmental management. 2020;264:110254. Available:https://www.sciencedirect.com/sc ience/article/pii/S0301479720301894
Wengert M, Piepho HP, Astor T, Graß R, Wijesingha J, Wachendorf M. Assessing spatial variability of barley whole crop biomass yield and leaf area index in silvoarable agroforestry systems using UAV-borne remote sensing. Remote Sensing. 2021;13(14):2751. Available:https://www.mdpi.com/2072- 4292/13/14/2751
Rizvi RH, Newaj R, Chaturvedi OP, Prasad R, Handa AK, Alam B. Carbon sequestration and CO 2 absorption by agroforestry systems: An assessment for Central Plateau and Hill region of India. Journal of Earth System Science. 2019 Apr;128(3):56.
Banerjee S, Palit D. Application of geospatial technology for agroforestry management. InAgroforestry for Carbon and Ecosystem Management 2024 Jan 1 (pp. 375-383). Academic Press.
Bindu G, Rajan P, Jishnu E S, Joseph K A. Carbon stock assessment of mangroves using remote sensing and geographic information system. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science. 2020;23(1):1-9.














