Regression-Type Imputation Scheme under Two-Stage with Unequal Chance of Random Non-Response at First Stage
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
641-660
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/kijst.v1i2.4146
Viewed: 171 times
Downloaded: 173 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
I. Abubakar1, A. Yahaya2, J. Garba3, Y. Aliyu4 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research focuses on the estimation of population mean in two-stage cluster sampling, where the firs-stage cluster units face unequal probabilities of random non-response. To address this, regression-type imputation schemes and estimators are developed, incorporating measurement error parameters for both the study and auxiliary variables. Analytical derivations and simulations demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed estimators. As shown in table 1, the proposed estimators which utilized the second auxiliary variable parameter outperform the usual mean per unit estimator and the Maji et al. (2018) estimator in Case A, both with and without measurement error. Similarly, in table 2, it can be observed that the suggested estimator ( ), is more efficient, that the usual mean per unit estimator without auxiliary information and the Maji et al. (2018) estimator, while Maji et al. (2018) estimator performed better than other estimators in the same scenario when measurement error is absence for all non-response probability selections. In another scenario, when measurement is presence, the proposed estimators are more efficient for all non-response probabilities. These results confirm the practicality and robustness of the proposed methods for estimating finite population means in the presence of non-response and measurement error.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
[2] M H Hansen and W N Hurwitz, The problem of non-response in sample surveys. Josurnal of the American Statistical Association, 1946; 41(236): 517-529.
[3] D B Rubin. Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 1976; 63(3): 581–592.
[4] D F Heitjan and S Basu. Distinguishing ‘missing at random’ and ‘missing completely at random. American Statistician, 1996; 50 (3): 207–213.
[5] S Singh and S Horn Compromised imputation in survey sampling. Metrika, 2000; 51(3): 267-276.
[6] S Singh and B Deo. Imputation by power transformation. Statistical Papers, 2003; 44(4): 555-579.
[7] C Kadilar and H.Cingi. Estimators for the population mean in the case of missing data. Communications in Statistics- Theory and Methods, 2008; 37, 2226-2236.
[8] H P Singh and N Karpe. On the estimation of ratio and product of two population means using supplementary information in presence. Statistica, 2009; 69(1): 27-47.
[9] A K Singh, P Singh, and V K Singh. Exponential-Type Compromised Imputation in Survey Sampling. Journal of Statistics & probability, 2014a; 3(2): 211-217.
[10] A A Gira. Estimation of population mean with a New Imputation Methods. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 2015; 9(34), 1663-1672.
[11] G N Singh, S Maurya, M Khetan, and C Kadilar. Some imputation methods for missing data in sample surveys. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, (2016); 45(6): 1865-1880.
[12] S Bhushan and A P Pandey. Optimal imputation of missing data for estimation of population mean. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 2016; 19(6), 755-769.
[13] A K Pandey, G N Singh, D Bhattacharyya, A Q Ali, S Al-Thubaiti, and H Yakout. Some classes of logarithmic-type imputation techniques for handling missing data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, (2021); pages11.
[14] G Singh, A K Jaiswal, C Singh, and M Usman. An improved alternative method of imputation for missing data is survey sampling. Hacettepe Journal of Statistics Applications and Probability, 2022; 11(2):535-543.
[15] W G Cochran. Errors of Measurement in Statistics. Technometrics, 1968; 10(4): 637-666.
[16] W A Fuller. Estimation in the presence of measurement error. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 1995; 121-141.
[17] S Shalabh. Ratio method of estimation in the presence of measurement errors. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 1997; 52: 150-155.
[18] Manisha and K R Singh. An estimation of population mean in the presence of measurement errors. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 2001; 54(1): 13-18.
[19] J Allen, H P Singh, and F Smarandache. A family of estimators of population mean using multiauxiliary information in presence of measurement errors. International Journal of Social Economics, 2003; 30(7): 837-848.
[20] S Singh. A new method of imputation in survey sampling. Statistics, 2009; 43(5): 499-511.
[21] C Salas and T G Gregoire. Statistical analysis of ratio estimators and their estimators of variances when the auxiliary variate is measured with error. European Journal of Forest Research, 2010; 129: 847-861.
[22] M Kumar, S Rajesh, A K Singh, and F Smarandache. Some ratio type estimators under measurement errors. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2011; 14(2): 272.
[23] D Shukla, S Pathak, and N S Thakur. An estimator for mean estimation in presence of measurement error. A Journal of Statistics, 2012; 1(1): 1-8.
[24] R Singh, S Malik, and M Kohshnivesan. An alternative estimator for estimating the finite population mean in presence of measurement errors with the view to financial modelling. Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 2014b; 2: 107-111.
[25] S Singh and A H Joarder. Estimation of finite population variance using random non-response in survey sampling. Metrika, 1998; 47(1): 241–249.
[26] S Singh, A H Joarder, and D S Tracy. Regression type estimators of random non-response in survey sampling. Statistica, 2000; 60(1): 39–44.
[27] H P Singh, R Tailor, J M Kim, and S Singh. Families of estimators of finite population variance using a random non-response in survey sampling. The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 2012; 25(4): 681–95.
[28] A Audu, O O Ishaq, A Abubakar, K A Akintola, U Isah, A Rashida , and S Muhammed). Regression-type Imputation Class of Estimators using Auxiliary Attributes. Asian Research Journal of Mathematics, 2021; 17(5): 1-13.
[29] R Maji, G N Singh, and A Bandyopadhyay. Estimation of population mean in presence of random non response in two-stage cluster sampling. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 2018; 48(14): 3586-3608.
[30] S Singh, A H Joarder, and D S Tracy. Median estimation using double sampling. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 2001; 43(1): 33–46.