Age Differences in Perceived Psychological Stress Among Moroccan Professional Football Players

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

This study explores the relationship between age and perceived psychological stress among Moroccan professional football players. Using a descriptive-analytical approach, data were collected from 250 players in the first and second divisions of the Moroccan Professional League, divided into four age groups: under 20, 21–25, 26–30, and over 31. The results revealed a significant inverse relationship between age and stress levels. Players under 20 experienced the highest stress, with 46.43% reporting high-stress levels, while only 13.16% of players over 31 reported the same. Mid-career players (26–30 years) showed more balanced stress levels, benefiting from both experience and physical peak performance. Statistical analysis using the Chi-square test confirmed this trend (χ² = 19.1296, p =<0.01), indicating a significant link between age and perceived stress. These findings suggest that younger players struggle more with stress due to limited experience and coping skills, while older players benefit from greater psychological resilience. Based on this, we recommend age-specific psychological interventions to enhance stress management strategies for football players at different career stages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Zendejas-Huerta E.N. (2027)
    Growth, skin quality and stress of farmed Morelet’s crocodiles (Crocodylus moreletii) housed communally or individually during the finishing stage
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
  2. Mussin R.A. (2027)
    Redistribution of rock pressure and deformation of the rock mass in the Karaganda coal basin
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 36-48
  3. Kusuma N.A. (2027)
    Exploring the acceptance of science teachers toward simulator-based technology
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Hicham, B., Ridouane, H., & Aicha, Z. (2025). Age Differences in Perceived Psychological Stress Among Moroccan Professional Football Players. International Journal of Education, Culture, and Society, 3(2), 382-389. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijecs.v3i2.5179

References

Burton, D., & Raedeke, T. D. (2008). Sport psychology for coaches. Human Kinetics.

Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385-396.

Côté, J., Hay, J., Silva, J. M., & Stevens, D. (2002). Psychological foundations of sport. Children’s involvement in sport: A developmental perspective. Boston, MA. Merrill.

Jones, M. V., Lavallee, D., & Thatcher, J. (Eds.). (2012). Coping and emotion in sport. Routledge.

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer

Publishing Company.

Lox, C. L., Ginis, K. A. M., Gainforth, H. L., & Petruzzello, S. J. (2019). The psychology of exercise: Integrating theory and practice. Routledge.

Mellalieu, S., & Hanton, S. (Eds.). (2008). Advances in applied sport psychology. London: Taylor & Francis.

Nicholls, A. R. (2021). Psychology in sports coaching: Theory and practice. Routledge.

Orlick, T. (2015). In pursuit of excellence. Human Kinetics.

Tod, D., Hodge, K., & Krane, V. (2023). Routledge handbook of applied sport psychology. Taylor and Francis.