Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Mountain communities are increasingly exposed to rapidly evolving fluid hazards, including flash floods, rainfall-triggered debris flows, glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), and flood–landslide cascades. Their short response times, complex terrain, sparse observational networks, and changing hydro-climatic conditions limit the generalizability of conventional threshold-based warning systems. This study develops a hybrid research framework that integrates physically interpretable mathematical modeling with deep learning for the early prediction of fluid hazards in mountain environments, with particular relevance to Nepal. The proposed framework integrates rainfall, snow and glacier indicators, soil moisture, terrain attributes, river stage and discharge, surface deformation, and historical hazard observations. A rainfall–runoff and threshold-based component provides physical constraints, while LSTM and CNN-LSTM models capture nonlinear temporal and spatial relationships. A probabilistic decision layer then translates model outputs into actionable warning levels while explicitly representing predictive uncertainty. Model performance is evaluated using precision, recall, F1-score, false-alarm ratio, probability of detection, critical success index, lead time, and calibration. Evidence considered in the study indicates that LSTM models can outperform conceptual rainfall–runoff models in some mountainous catchments in Nepal, while community-based warning systems can substantially extend warning lead time when forecasts are effectively integrated with local response mechanisms. The study further identifies sensor limitations, domain shift, rare-event imbalance, communication failures, model interpretability, and institutional coordination as major implementation challenges. The proposed framework contributes an explainable and community-oriented architecture for data-scarce mountain regions by combining physical process representation, machine-learning-based hazard probability estimation, uncertainty communication, and locally meaningful warning dissemination. It provides a basis for developing next-generation early-warning systems in which mathematical models constrain prediction, machine learning updates hazard probabilities, and communities receive timely and actionable warnings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Huang L. (2027)
    Biomimetic Gradient Porous Core–Shell Fibers with Enhanced Gas Sensing for CO-Temperature Dual-Mode Early Fire Warning
    Nano Micro Letters, 19(1)
  2. Sun M. (2027)
    Bolstered Interfacial Field Chemistry for Deep Fast-Charging Aqueous Zinc Metal Batteries
    Nano Micro Letters, 19(1)
  3. Toshov J.B. (2027)
    Mathematical Model of the Dynamics of the Armament of the Tricone Drill Bit
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 342(3), 27-34

Article Details

How to Cite
Gupta, A., & Sahani, S. K. (2026). Mathematical Modeling and Deep Learning for Early Prediction of Fluid Hazards in Mountain Communities. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Sciences and Artificial Intelligence, 3(3), 402-421. https://doi.org/10.58578/amjsai.v3i3.12121

References

Abrahart, R. J., & See, L. (2000). Comparing neural network and autoregressive moving average techniques for predicting flood events. Journal of Hydrology, 231–232, 102–119.

Beven, K. (2012). Rainfall-runoff modelling: The primer (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119951001

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

Cui, H., Luo, J., Yang, X., Zuo, G., Jing, X., & He, G. (2025). An explainable flash flood prediction model in the Qinling Mountains. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 18(4), e70136. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70136

Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press. https://www.deeplearningbook.org/

He, N., Yang, Y., Deng, H., Wang, H., Li, L., & Gurkalo, F. (2026). Early warning method for rainfall-induced debris flow based on LSTM and InSAR technology. Frontiers in Earth Science, 14, 1917042. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2026.1917042

Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

Jiang, H., Zou, Q., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Zhou, B., Zhou, W., Yao, S., Dai, X., Yao, H., & Chen, S. (2024). Deep learning prediction of rainfall-driven debris flows considering the similar critical thresholds within comparable background conditions. Environmental Modelling & Software, 179, 106130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106130

Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Brenner, C., Schulz, K., & Herrnegger, M. (2018). Rainfall–runoff modelling using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22, 6005–6022. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6005-2018

Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Shalev, G., Klambauer, G., Hochreiter, S., & Nearing, G. (2019). Towards learning universal, regional, and local hydrological behaviors via machine learning applied to large-sample datasets. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 23, 5089–5110. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5089-2019

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521, 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

Merz, B., Thieken, A. H., & Gocht, M. (2007). Flood risk management by combining flood mapping and vulnerability assessment. Natural Hazards.

Montanari, A., Young, G., Savenije, H. H. G., Hughes, D., Wagener, T., Ren, L. L., Koutsoyiannis, D., Cudennec, C., Toth, E., Grimaldi, S., Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., Gupta, H., Hipsey, M., Schaefli, B., Arheimer, B., Boegh, E., Schymanski, S. J., … Belyaev, V. (2013). “Panta Rhei—Everything flows”: Change in hydrology and society—The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013–2022. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58(6), 1256–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.809088

Pathak, L. (2026). A multi-model statistical, machine learning, and deep learning framework for landslide susceptibility in Nepal’s mid-hills. Discover Hazards, 2, 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44475-026-00029-0

Pradhan, A. M. S., & Kim, Y.-T. (2025). From hazard assessment to action: National landslide susceptibility to rainfall and early warning in Nepal. Asian Journal of Engineering Geology, 2(Special Issue), 381–382. https://ajeg.nseg.org.np/index.php/ajeg/article/view/239

Pradhan, D., Adhikari, M., Shrestha, D., & Thakuri, S. (2026). Rainfall thresholds for flood early warning in the Babai River Basin, Nepal using rainfall-runoff modelling. Discover Geoscience, 4, 250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-026-00631-1

Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat. (2019). Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature, 566, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1

Sahani, S. K. (2023a). Application of numerical methods in structural health monitoring using IoT sensors. Journal of Electrical Systems, 19(1), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.8941

Sahani, S. K. (2023b). Neural network surrogates for weather prediction using numerical solutions of the shallow water equations. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(3S), 356–368. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijisae.v11i3s.7686

Sahani, S. K. (2024a). AI-enhanced finite element method (FEM) for structural analysis. Journal of Electrical Systems, 20(1), 661–676. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.8946

Sahani, S. K. (2024b). Big data learning analytics & optimization: Algorithms, challenges, and applications. Analysis and Metaphysics, 23(1), 912–924. https://www.analysisandmetaphysics.com/index.php/journal/article/view/142

Sahani, S. K., Lee, T.-F., Pandey, D., Pandey, B. K., Jha, R., & Karna, S. L. (2026a). Explainable machine learning for credit risk management and intelligent lending decisions in Nepalese cooperative banks: A mathematical review. Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science, 3(6s), 1735–1772. https://doi.org/10.59543/jidmis.v3.1549

Sahani, S. K., Lee, T.-F., Pandey, D., Pandey, B. K., Jha, R., & Karna, S. L. (2026b). Machine learning–augmented hybrid risk management and deep uncertainty quantification in Nepalese management systems: Fractional stochasticity, Wasserstein robustness, and rough–path neural filtering. Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science, 3(3s), 1850–1873. https://doi.org/10.59543/jidmis.v3.971

Sahani, S. K., Lee, T.-F., Pandey, D., Pandey, B. K., & Mandal, K. (2026). Hybrid analytical, numerical, and machine learning frameworks for solving deterministic and stochastic differential equations with stability, convergence, and uncertainty quantification. Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science, 3(3s), 1794–1849. https://doi.org/10.59543/jidmis.v3.970

Sahani, S. K., Lee, T.-F., Pandey, D., Pandey, B. K., Sah, B. K., & Jha, R. (2026). A hybrid analytical, numerical, and machine learning framework for health management, resource allocation, operational efficiency, risk forecasting, and strategic decision-making in Nepal. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 18(8s), 1221–1242. https://doi.org/10.70917/ijcisim-2026-3400

Sahani, S. K., Lee, T.-F., Pandey, D., Pandey, B. K., Sah, B. K., Jha, R., & Sah, D. K. (2026). Hybrid analytical–numerical–machine learning architecture for decision-making, risk management, operational stability, and uncertainty quantification in dental practice management systems: A mathematical theory. European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 34(5s), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1922/ejprd.v34i5s.1559

Sahani, S. K., Lee, T.-F., Pandey, D., Pandey, B. K., Sah, B. K., Mandal, K., & Jha, R. (2026). Biotechnological catalysts in hybrid analytical–numerical–machine learning architectures for risk-aware decision-making and uncertainty quantification in Nepalese management systems. European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 34(7s), 332–350. https://doi.org/10.1922/ejprd.v34i7s.1622

Sahani, S. K., & Sah, B. K. (2024). Integrating neural networks with numerical methods for solving nonlinear differential equations. Computer Fraud and Security. https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.703

Sahani, S. K., & Sah, D. K. (2022). A comprehensive study on predicting numerical integration errors using machine learning approaches. Letters in High Energy Physics, 2022, 96–103. https://doi.org/10.52783/lhep.2022.1465

Shen, C. (2018). A transdisciplinary review of deep learning research and its relevance for water resources scientists. Water Resources Research, 54, 8558–8593. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022643

Smith, P. J., Brown, S., & Dugar, S. (2017). Community-based early warning systems for flood risk mitigation in Nepal. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 17(3), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-423-2017

Thapa, N., Uddin, K., Thapa, R. B., & Udas, E. (2026). Flood and landslide susceptibility assessment and multi hazard interaction mapping using machine learning and GIS for sustainable settlement planning in Nepal. Discover Geoscience, 4, 287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-026-00670-8

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>