Comparative Analysis of Snail Growth using Different Local Feeds

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

This study aimed at comparing growth performance, establishing different locally available feeds and determine the most efficient among the feedstuff for snail using four different feeds (Moringa oleifera leaves, Carica papaya leaves, Citrillus lanatus  peels and broiler starter mash for 16 weeks at the Forest Institute of Nigeria (FRIN). Forty (40) Archachatina marginata (African Snail) of 8 weeks were used for the study. The snails were randomly divided into groups of 10 snails each. The groups were randomly assigned to 3 local diets and a concentrate (manufactured feed) in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD). The snails were housed in motor tyres and each was half filled with hot water-treated loamy soil 5cm depth .The soil was moistened two times daily by sprinkling of tap water.  Pits were made round the tyres, filled with water mixed with condemned motor engine oil to scare away or trap ants and insects on entering the tyres to avoid disturbance. Feeds and water were provided throughout the study period which lasted for 16 weeks. Other management practices such as removing the leftover food, changing of water, removal of excreta were observed. The performance of the Archachatina marginata was assessed on the basis of weight gained, shell length and shell width. These parameters were measured using weighing balance and venier caliper. The Archachatina marginata treated with water melon peels showed better performance than other in terms of shell length (13.62 ± 0.31a) while the ones treated with concentrate were weightier (94.40 ± 1.07a). For circumference of the snail, the snails fed with concentrate performed better (32.36 ± 0.99), followed by 30.00 ± 0.92, 28.28 ± 0.35 and 25.32 ± 0.48 respectively. Similarly, significant weight difference(p<0.05) was noticed with the highest found in the snails treated with water melon peel (94.40 ± 1.07a) followed by Carica papaya leaves (87.00 ± 1.37b), followed by concentrate (80.00 ± 1.41c) then, Moringa oleifera leaves (74.40 ± 2.29d). It is recommended that, more natural feeds be experimented in feeding snails to test for growth and reproduction and government should sensitize and empower local farmers for snail farming.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Toshov J.B. (2027)
    Comparative Analysis of Mathematical Models of Drilling in Heterogeneous Geological Sections
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 60-70
  2. Kylyshkanov M. (2027)
    Innovative Adsorbent Materials for Efficient Silicon Extraction from Industrial Waters: A review
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 105-116
  3. A.g S. (2027)
    Polymer-bitumen compositions for improving the energy efficiency of road construction
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 97-104

Article Details

How to Cite
S, M. G., & R, U. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Snail Growth using Different Local Feeds. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Sciences and Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 241-248. https://doi.org/10.58578/amjsai.v1i1.3533

References

Adeyemo, A. I. (2005). Response of Juvenile Giant Snails fed by varying levels of Cocoa pod husk. J. Amin. Vet. Adv.
Akinnusi O. (1998). Introduction to Snail Farming,Omega Science Publisher, Lagos, Nigeria.
Aravind, N. A. (2005). Ecology of Land Snails of Western Ghats. PhD Thesis, Department of Applied Zoology, Mangalore University, Mangalore, 182pp.
Bright, S. O. (1996). Problems and Prospects Associated with Snail Farming. Heritage Printers Nigeria Limited, Lagos, Nigeria, p96.
Ejike, B. N. and Afolayan, T. A. (2010). Effects of Natural and Compounded Rations on the Growth Performance of African Giant Land Snail (Archachatina marginata), Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Vol. 2(1), pp 107-111.
Ejike, B. N., (2001). Comparative Effect of Supplemental and Complete Diets on the Performance of African Giant Land Snail (Archachatina margina) Proc. 26th Ann. Conf., Nig. Soc. For Anim. Prod. (NSAP), March 18-22, 2001. NAPRI, Zaria, Nigeria.pp 151- 153.
Fagbuaro O. Oso J. A, Edward B. and Ogunleye R. F. (2006). Nutritional status of four species of African Giant Snails in Nigeria. J. Zhejiang uni.sci. B. 7(9): 686-889.
Gomot A. (1998). Biochemical Composition of Helix Snails. Influence of Genetic and Physiological Factors. J.Moll stud. 64:173-181.
Omole A. J. and Makinde A. S. (2005). Backyard Farming at a Glance. Back to Agricultural Series(1) Technovisor Agricultural Publications, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Omole A. J., Tewe O. O., Makinde G. O., Adetoro F. O., Saka J. O. and Ogundola F. I. (2000). Preliminary Studies on the Response of Growing Snails (Archachatina margina) to Compounded Ration. Tropical Animal Production Investigation. 3: 35- 40.
Oyenuga V. A. (1968). Agriculture in Nigeria. Rome, FAO, Italy.
Pounds, J. A., M. P. L. Fogden & J. H. Campbell (1999). Biology Response to Climate Change on a Tropical Mountain. Nature 398: 611-615.
Siyanbola Mojisola Funmilayo. (2008). Preliminary investigation of growth performance of giant land snail (Archachatina marginata) fed with selected household wastes. African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol 3 (9), pp. 647-649.
Siyanbola M. F. (2008). Preliminary Investigation of Growth Performance of Giant Land Snail. African Journal of Agricultural Research 3(9)
Stievenart C. (1992). Observation on Shell Lip Formation and Reproduction in the African Giant Land Snail (Archachatina margina). Snail Research Farming. 4: 20- 29.