Performance Evaluation of a Rotary Paddy Power Weeder

Main Article Content

Muhammed Ibrahim Binni
Abdulwahab M.
Ishaya Genesis
Zago Salisu Idris

Abstract

Weed infestation in paddy cultivation substantially constrains yield and profitability, especially where reliance on manual weeding remains time-consuming and costly. This study evaluates the performance of a rotary paddy power weeder powered by a 1.75 hp two-stroke petrol engine under wetland conditions, focusing on operational efficiency and economic feasibility. Field experiments were conducted at three forward speeds (1.58, 1.92, and 2.34 km/h) to assess weeding efficiency, plant damage, field capacity, fuel consumption, and post-weeding weed re-emergence. The results show that an intermediate forward speed of 1.92 km/h produced the best overall performance, achieving a weeding efficiency of 72.38% with minimal crop injury. Higher speeds increased field capacity but also elevated fuel consumption and reduced weeding quality, as the moving blades lacked sufficient dwell time for complete weed cutting. Cost analysis demonstrated that mechanized weeding with the rotary power weeder markedly reduced labor requirements and lowered weeding costs by approximately Rs. 2265 per hectare compared with manual methods. These findings indicate that rotary paddy power weeders offer a sustainable and economically viable alternative to manual weeding in paddy fields, supporting improved weed management and farm profitability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Lukpanov R.E. (2027)
    Evaluation of the Effect of Additives on the Workability of Concrete Mix as Part of a Study of a Modified Wall Block
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 342(3), 100-110
  2. Shiryazdi R.S. (2027)
    Assessing performances of pattern informatics method variants: a comparative analysis in Zagros, Iran
    Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 20(3), 65-80
  3. Asl S.B. (2027)
    Uncertainty estimation in earthquake magnitude determination using high-rate GPS data with Bootstrap method
    Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 20(3), 187-203

Article Details

How to Cite
Binni, M. I., M., A., Genesis, I., & Idris, Z. S. (2026). Performance Evaluation of a Rotary Paddy Power Weeder. Asian Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Art, 4(1), 78-84. https://doi.org/10.58578/ajstea.v4i1.8130

References

Kadam, D. M., Shrivastava, A. K., Deshmukh, G., Kumar, A., Chethan, C. R., Nandini, Y., & Singh, I. (2019). Evaluation of power weeder and comparative study with manually operated rotary weeders and manual weeding method. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(5), 2528–2533.

Khayer, S. M., & Patel, T. (2022). Response surface design optimization for blade geometry of non-rotary push-pull type weeder. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences: An International Journal, 13(4), 1079–1086.

Mandal, S. K., Bhattacharya, B., & Mukherjee, S. (2013). Optimization of design parameters for rotary tiller’s blade. Power, 4(5).

Mohler, C. L. (2001). Mechanical management of weeds. In M. Liebman, C. L. Mohler, & C. P. Staver (Eds.), Ecological management of agricultural weeds (pp. 139–209). Cambridge University Press.

Pullen, D. W. M., & Cowell, P. A. (1997). An evaluation of the performance of mechanical weeding mechanisms for use in high-speed inter-row weeding of arable crops. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 67(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1997.0148

Ragesh, K. T., Jogdand, S. V., & Victor, V. M. (2018). Field performance evaluation of power weeder for paddy crop. Current Agriculture Research Journal, 6(3), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.6.3.24

Tayade, N. H., & Sahu, B. (2020). Performance evaluation of power weeder for paddy crop. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(2), 2291–2295. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.902.259


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.