Transformasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Era Society 5.0: Integrasi Teknologi Digital dan Literasi Spiritual Transformation of Islamic Religious Education Learning in the Society 5.0 Era: Integration of Digital Technology and Spiritual Literacy

Crossmark

Article Sidebar

Page Numbers: 356-366
Download PDF
Published: Dec 3, 2025
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i1.8163
Save this to:
Save to Mendeley Download RIS

Article Metrics:
Viewed: 355 times
Downloaded: 227 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (USD 0.00)
Check for article on SINTA:

LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers

Connected Papers:
Connected Papers


Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.


Authors:
Saiful Rizal1
Copyright :

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.

Explore Our Journals
Find the journal that best fits your research. If this journal does not match your manuscript’s scope, explore our portfolio below to select a more suitable publication venue.

Main Article Content

Saiful Rizal
IAI Nurul Hakim Kediri Lombok Barat

Abstract

The era of Society 5.0 demands that the education sector, including Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI), undergo transformation and adapt to the rapid development of digital technologies without neglecting the importance of spiritual literacy as the foundation for students’ character formation. This article aims to analyze forms of PAI instructional transformation through the utilization of digital technology integrated with the strengthening of spiritual literacy. The research method employed is library research with a descriptive–analytical approach to literature related to PAI, educational technology, and the discourse on Society 5.0. The findings indicate that the transformation of PAI in the Society 5.0 era is manifested through the use of digital platforms, the deployment of artificial intelligence–based media, the development of hybrid curricula, and the implementation of interactive learning models combined with the cultivation of spiritual values grounded in critical reflection and the internalization of religious teachings. The integration of digital technology and spiritual literacy is assessed as capable of addressing contemporary educational challenges while preserving the core objective of nurturing noble character. The article concludes that the development of innovative, relevant, and character-oriented PAI learning models depends heavily on the capacity of educators and educational institutions to manage the synergy between digital technology and spiritual literacy, and it is expected to serve as a reference for the formulation of policies and instructional practices in PAI in the Society 5.0 era.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Irawati R. (2027)
    Enhancing accounting students’ writing performance through problem-based learning: Evidence from a vocational higher education context
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
  2. Azhand A. (2027)
    Teaching Persian derivational affixes to non-Persian speakers from a Cognitive Morphology Approach: A case study of nominal suffixes (kar, gar, ban, baz, -ande)
    Language Related Research, 17(4), 469-497
  3. Kenzhaliyev B.K. (2027)
    Predicting Copper Production Cycles in Hydrometallurgy with Interpretable Machine Learning
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 5-15

Article Details

How to Cite
Rizal, S. (2025). Transformasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Era Society 5.0: Integrasi Teknologi Digital dan Literasi Spiritual. TSAQOFAH, 6(1), 356-366. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v6i1.8163

Creative Commons License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

References

Aini, N. (2023). Pendidikan Agama Islam di Era Digital. Prenadamedia Group.
Akiyama, T. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Keidanren.
Altınpulluk, H. (2022). Digital transformation in education: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 5(2), 45–59.
Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: A social transformation through technology. Japan Spotlight, 47(4), 47–50. https://www.jef.or.jp/journal/pdf/220th_Special_Article_02.pdf
Hamdan, M., & Yusuf, M. (2021). Pendidikan Agama Islam di Era Digital: Tantangan dan Strategi Inovasi Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 23–38.
Hasan, M. (2022). Implementasi Society 5.0 dalam Pembelajaran PAI. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 15(2), 112–125.
Hasan, M. (2024). Transformasi Pembelajaran PAI di Era Digital. Prenadamedia Group.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
Mansir, F., & Karim, A. (2020). Digital literacy and Islamic education: Integration of technology in teaching and learning. International Journal of Islamic Educational Studies, 3(2), 101–115.
Pane, D., Rarry, M., & Haryanto, H. (2017). The effectiveness of personalized learning in digital education. Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 112–124.
Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2017). Continued progress: Promising evidence on personalized learning. RAND Corporation.
Putra, P. H. (2019a). Integrasi Teknologi dan Pendidikan Islam di Era Digital. Lembaga Studi Islam.
Putra, P. H. (2019b). Pendidikan Islam di Era Digital: Tantangan dan Peluang. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Kontemporer, 4(2), 45–58.
Rahmawati, S. (2024). Integrasi Teknologi Digital dalam Pendidikan Islam. Tarbiyah Journal, 8(1), 45–59.
Saputra, D., & Murdani, R. (2023). Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam Era Society 5.0: Tantangan dan Strategi Inovatif. Alfabeta.
Saputra, R., & Murdani, E. (2023). Digitalisasi Pendidikan Islam dalam Perspektif Spiritual Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Digital, 5(1), 77–91.
Sugiyono. (2019a). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2019b). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Alfabeta.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. (2003). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/details/43920/uu-no-20-tahun-2003
Walkington, C. (2013a). Using adaptive learning technologies to personalize instruction for students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 861–884.
Walkington, C. (2013b). Using adaptive learning technologies to personalize instruction to student interests: The impact of relevant contexts on performance and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 932–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031882
Yulianto, A. (2023a). Literasi Spiritual dan Tantangan Pendidikan Modern. Jurnal Studi Islam, 11(3), 203–217.
Yulianto, A. (2023b). Model Pembelajaran Islami Berbasis Digital: Refleksi dan Implementasi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 33–47.
Yusof, N., & Salleh, S. (2020). Pedagogical innovation in Islamic education during the Industrial Revolution 4.0. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 8(4), 78–86.