The Epistemological Function of Mantiq (Logic) in Al-Ghazali’s Mi‘yar al-‘Ilm

Main Article Content


Abstract

Although Al-Ghazali’s epistemology and logical thought have been widely examined, the role of mantiq (logic) in knowledge formation and validation in Mi‘yar al-‘Ilm fi Fann al-Mantiq remains insufficiently explored. This study analyzes the epistemological function of logic in Al-Ghazali’s thought through a philosophical examination of this work. A qualitative library research approach was employed, using Mi‘yar al-‘Ilm as the primary source alongside secondary literature on Al-Ghazali’s logic, Islamic epistemology, and the development of mantiq within the Islamic intellectual tradition. Sources were documented and analyzed using descriptive-analytical and interpretive methods, focusing on tashawwur, tashdiq, definitions, propositions, and qiyas. The findings indicate that logic functions as an epistemological instrument that structures knowledge acquisition through accurate conceptualization, proper judgment, and valid inference. However, logic is not presented as the sole source of knowledge, since the epistemic warrant of its conclusions also depends on the truth and justification of the premises. These findings clarify the relationship between logical reasoning and knowledge validation in Al-Ghazali’s epistemological framework. The study contributes to understanding mantiq as a methodological foundation that connects rational inquiry with the broader pursuit of knowledge within the Islamic intellectual tradition.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 12494.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Kenzhegulov A.K. (2028)
    Investigation of the Structure and Composition of TiN and CrN Coatings as a Function of Deposition Parameters
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 344(1), 55-64
  2. Rezvani V. (2027)
    Analysis of "Agentive Suffixes" in Russian and Persian Nouns from a Cognitive Morphological Perspective
    Language Related Research, 17(4), 203-230
  3. Fauziah L. (2027)
    Ecological diversity in soil properties and bacterial communities in tropical coastal areas with contrasting electrical conductivity
    Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 13(1), 231-250

Article Details

How to Cite
Latief, A. G., Hambali, R. Y. A., & Muhlas. (2026). The Epistemological Function of Mantiq (Logic) in Al-Ghazali’s Mi‘yar al-‘Ilm. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 8970-8992. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.12494

References

Adamson, P. (2016). Philosophy in the Islamic world: A history of philosophy without any gaps (Vol. 3). Oxford University Press.

Al-Ghazali. (2005). Deliverance from error and the beginning of guidance (W. M. Watt, Trans.; Rev. ed.). Islamic Book Trust.

Al-Ghazali. (2011). The revival of the religious sciences.

Al-Ghazali. (2024). Ilmu Mantik: Kaidah-Kaidah Berpikir Logis Para Fisuf yang Wajib Dipelajari (A. K. Nafis, Trans.). DIVA Press.

Bakar, O. (1998). Classification of knowledge in Islam: A study in Islamic philosophies of science. Islamic Texts Society. https://its.org.uk/catalogue/classification-of-knowledge-in-islam-paperback/

Black, D. L. (1990). Logic and Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Poetics in medieval Arabic philosophy. E. J. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004452398

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/research-design-5-255675

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-research-5-242504

El-Rouayheb, K. (2019). The development of Arabic logic (1200–1800). Schwabe Verlag.

Fadhil, M. Y., & Sebgag, S. (2021). Sufi approaches to education: The epistemology of Imam Al-Ghazali. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v4i1.834

Frank, R. M. (1992). Creation and the cosmic system: Al-Ghazâlî & Avicenna (2nd ed.). Carl Winter.

Griffel, F. (2009). Al-Ghazali’s philosophical theology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331622.001.0001

Günther, S. (2025). Al-Ghazālī on logic as a means of learning: Historical evidence and educational implications. Al-Abhath, 73(1–2), 27–71.

Gutas, D. (2014). Avicenna and the Aristotelian tradition: Introduction to reading Avicenna’s philosophical works (2nd rev. and enlarged ed., including an inventory of Avicenna’s authentic works). Brill. https://brill.com/display/title/12267

Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036234454

Janssens, J. (2002). Al-Ghazzālī’s Mi‘yār al-‘ilm fī fann al-manṭīq: Sources avicenniennes et farabiennes. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge, 69(1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.3917/ahdlm.069.0039

Leaman, O. (Ed.). (2015). The biographical encyclopedia of Islamic philosophy. Bloomsbury Academic. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/biographical-encyclopedia-of-islamic-philosophy-9781472569448/

Marhon, R. (2020). Logical scales Imam Al-Ghazali (505 AH) and some of its applications to matters of belief. Islamic Sciences Journal, 11(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.25130/jis.20.11.2.1

Marmura, M. E. (1965). Ghazali and demonstrative science. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 3(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2008.1685

McGinnis, J. (2010). Avicenna. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331479.001.0001

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://study.sagepub.com/miles3e

Nasr, S. H. (2006). Islamic philosophy from its origin to the present: Philosophy in the land of prophecy. State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780791481554

Ormsby, E. (1984). Theodicy in Islamic thought: The dispute over Al-Ghazali’s best of all possible worlds. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400856336

Rizza, M., Amalina, F., Syisyani, A. A., & Mujib, F. (2026). Teacher personality in Islamic perspective based on the Qur’an and Hadith. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 7827–7849. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.12298

Rizza, M., Amri, M. K., Mirayanti, E., & Ridha, M. (2026). Islamic moral values, teacher professionalism, and character formation in Islamic education. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 8407–8424. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.12364

Rizza, M., Azahra, S. N., Harvia, D. S., & Fathin, A. S. (2026). The concept of teacher personality in Islamic education: Exploring Qur’anic principles and prophetic guidance. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 7947–7973. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.12309

Rizza, M., Bana, P. H., & Nurlatipah, N. (2026). Teacher personality in Islamic education in the digital era: Philosophical, moral, spiritual, and psychological perspectives. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 8330–8348. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.12360

Rizza, M., Fauziah, S. N., Azhari, S. S., & Mawaddah, W. F. (2026). Beyond knowledge transmission: Integrating faith, character, and professional responsibility in Islamic teacher formation. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 8365–8385. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.12362

Rizza, M., Nugraha, E. J., Muzadi, M. A., & Iqbal, M. (2026). Teacher personality in Islamic education: A comparative study of Ibn Sina, Al-Ghazali, and Malik Badri. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 8251–8271. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.12346

Rizza, M., Prawira, F. B., Ma’arif, H. S., Fauzan, M. F., & Habibi, M. H. (2026). Islamic perspectives on teacher personality: Insights from Ibn Sina, Al-Ghazali, and Malik Badri. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 8386–8406. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.12363

Street, T. (2004). Arabic logic. In D. M. Gabbay & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the history of logic: Vol. 1. Greek, Indian and Arabic logic (pp. 523–596). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-5857(04)80009-8

Towpek, Y., & Salleh, K. (2016). The objectives and references of Mi‘yar al-‘Ilm fi Fann al-Mantiq. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 9(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.09.2016.008

Treiger, A. (2012). Inspired knowledge in Islamic thought: Al-Ghazālī’s theory of mystical cognition and its Avicennian foundation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203806487

Wisnovsky, R. (2003). Avicenna’s metaphysics in context. Cornell University Press. https://cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780801441783/avicennas-metaphysics-in-context/