Main Article Content


Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI, is reshaping how students access, produce, verify, and communicate information, raising questions about source authority, adab, values, and character formation in Islamic Religious Education (IRE). This study examines the challenges facing IRE teachers and proposes a repositioning of their roles from an Islamic epistemological perspective. A qualitative library research approach was employed, drawing on literature on Islamic education and epistemology, teacher ethics, UNESCO guidance on AI in education, and recent studies on AI and IRE. Sources were examined through content and conceptual analysis. The findings position AI as a supporting instrument subject to human epistemic oversight and identify teachers’ roles as knowledge curators, information validators, digital ethics mentors, learning designers, and exemplars of adab. AI outputs should be evaluated within the relationship among revelation, reason, experience, scholarly tradition, and technology. The study proposes the IRE teacher as an epistemic gatekeeper responsible for safeguarding information quality, guiding verification, and aligning technology use with Islamic educational aims. To support implementation, it introduces the Verifikasi model, comprising source verification, ethical use, reflection, integration of religious evidence, process orientation, human initiative, and accountability. The study contributes a conceptual basis and an implementation model for repositioning IRE teachers, emphasizing that AI integration should strengthen literacy, critical reasoning, and adab while preserving human responsibility in education.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 12325.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Lin X. (2027)
    Capacity Degradation Mechanisms, Recovery Strategies, and Challenges of Flow Batteries
    Nano Micro Letters, 19(1)
  2. Lee H. (2027)
    Low-Temperature All-Solid-State Batteries
    Nano Micro Letters, 19(1)
  3. Kenzhegulov A.K. (2028)
    Investigation of the Structure and Composition of TiN and CrN Coatings as a Function of Deposition Parameters
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 344(1), 55-64

Article Details

How to Cite
Yunita, T., Khumairoh, D., Zikri, M., Andrian, T., & Zalisman. (2026). Challenges and the Repositioning of Islamic Religious Education Teachers in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Perspective from Islamic Epistemology. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 7974-7993. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.12325

References

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1980). The concept of education in Islam: A framework for an Islamic philosophy of education. ABIM.

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1995). Prolegomena to the metaphysics of Islam: An exposition of the fundamental elements of the worldview of Islam. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.

Artha Nugraha, N. A., Firmansyah, M. I., & Nugraha, R. H. (2025). AI-gamification in Qur’anic learning: Assessing Indonesian Islamic religious education teachers’ readiness for Generation Alpha. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 12(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v12i1.50479

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Hady, Y., Krisnawati, N. M., & Fatima, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI), the erosion of tacit knowledge, and the challenges of cultivating wisdom: Epistemological and ethical implications for 21st century Islamic education. EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama dan Keagamaan, 23(2), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v23i2.2407

Harahap, I. A., Nahar, S., & Hanum OK, A. (2025). Etika Pendidik Perspektif Imam Badruddin Ibnu Jama’ah dalam Kitab Tadzkiratus Sami’ Wal Mutakalim Fii Adabil ‘Alim Wal Muta’alim. Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama, 8(3), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.37329/kamaya.v8i3.4589

Hayani, A., Nurdiana, Zulfikar Habibullah, A., & Salim, A. (2022). The tracing the internalization of adab in Islamic education perspective of Syed Muhammad Naquib Al Attas. Sunan Kalijaga International Journal on Islamic Educational Research, 6(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.14421/skijier.2022.61.03

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Mat Yusoff, S., Mohamad Marzaini, A. F., Zynuddin, S. N., Mat Jusoh, A. M., Basal, M. H., Alias, N. R., & Saad, N. (2026). Ethical integration of generative artificial intelligence in Islamic religious education involves human mediation and source verification. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 6(1), Article 1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-026-02251-7

Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

Sassi, K. (2018). Ta’dib as a concept of Islamic education purification: Study on the thoughts of Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. Journal of Malay Islamic Studies, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.19109/JMIS.v2i1.2541

Sperling, K., Stenberg, C.-J., McGrath, C., Åkerfeldt, A., Heintz, F., & Stenliden, L. (2024). In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review. Computers and Education Open, 6, Article 100169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zed, M. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.