Indonesian-Arabic-English Code-Mixing in TikTok Da’wah: Linguistic Patterns, Communicative Functions, and Audience Accommodation

Main Article Content


Abstract

This study examines Indonesian–Arabic–English code-mixing in TikTok da’wah videos, focusing on structural patterns, communicative functions, complementary linguistic roles, and communication accommodation. It aims to explain how multilingual resources contribute to religious expression, social identity, and audience orientation in digital religious discourse. The corpus comprised 29 TikTok da’wah videos containing 192 identified code-mixing units. Structural patterns were classified using Muysken’s typology, communicative functions were examined, and Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) was applied to 20 selected units. Insertion was the dominant structural pattern, accounting for 67.7% of the identified units, followed by alternation at 32.3%. No instances of congruent lexicalization were identified. The functional analysis associated Arabic primarily with religious quotation (28.4%) and English with identity marking (28.6%) and topic marking (26.4%). Prayers, honorifics, closings, and discourse markers also demonstrated pragmatic functions extending beyond the established functional categories. Indonesian provided the primary framework for conveying messages, Arabic maintained religious references and etiquette, and English contributed to identity expression, audience familiarity, and discourse organization. Among the 20 units examined through CAT, 10 displayed convergence, two displayed maintenance, and eight combined both orientations. These patterns suggest that accommodation can involve simultaneous efforts to establish audience proximity and preserve distinctive linguistic or religious features. The findings characterize code-mixing as a multilingual practice that brings communicative accessibility, religious identity, and contemporary digital expression into interaction. The study contributes to sociolinguistic research by connecting structural and functional analysis with accommodation in social media religious communication. It also provides a foundation for further investigation of how multilingual choices relate to audience interpretations and responses across different digital da’wah contexts.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 12473.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Citation data unavailable from the configured source
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Merkibayev Y.S. (2028)
    Optimization of Aluminum Casting Process Using PLA-Based Casting Patterns and Analysis of their Thermal Behavior
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 345(2), 5-15
  2. Poezzhaev I.P. (2028)
    Placer formation processes in the cenozoic of Northern and Eastern Kazakhstan
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 345(2), 52-71
  3. Sergeevich P.V. (2028)
    Identification of Methane-Bearing Coal Seams in Borehole Sections of the Karaganda Basin Using Geophysical Logging Data
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 345(2), 72-83

Article Details

How to Cite
Salsabila, A., Fitrah, A., & Pamungkas, M. I. (2026). Indonesian-Arabic-English Code-Mixing in TikTok Da’wah: Linguistic Patterns, Communicative Functions, and Audience Accommodation. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 8865-8886. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.12473

References

Andini, W., & Sibuea, T. (2026). Translation strategies and ideology in Indonesian versions of Let It Go and Show Yourself. DIALEKTIKA: JURNAL BAHASA, SASTRA DAN BUDAYA, 13(1), 204–224. https://doi.org/10.33541/dia.v13i1.8506

Androutsopoulos, J. (Ed.). (2014). Mediatization and sociolinguistic change. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346831

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870

Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Campbell, H. A., & Cheong, P. H. (Eds.). (2024). The Oxford handbook of digital religion. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197549803.001.0001

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/educational-research-planning-conducting-and-evaluating-quantitative-and-qualitative-research/P200000000920

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design-4-246896

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design-5-266033

Dhayef, Q. A., & Kareem, T. M. (2025). Exploring semantic discrepancies of selected religious terminologies in English and Arabic. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 6(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v6i1.1124

Douglas, H. (2022). Sampling techniques for qualitative research. In M. R. Islam, N. A. Khan, & R. Baikady (Eds.), Principles of social research methodology (pp. 415–426). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_29

Gardner-Chloros, P. (2025). Bilingualism. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262549431/bilingualism/

Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1–68). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663673.001

Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834

Hikmah, S. (2026). Da’wah communication system on the TikTok platform: An analysis of interactions among preachers, messages, and audiences in the digital era. PROGRESIF: Jurnal Dakwah, Sosial, dan Komunikasi, 3(2), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.63199/progresif.v3i2.74

Huang, H., Cheng, H., Qian, L., Chen, Y., & Zhou, P. (2024). Wh-words: Existential or universal quantifiers in child Mandarin? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 53(3), Article 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-024-10079-4

Husin, A. (2026). Retorika Dakwah Das’ad Latif dalam Media YouTube: Analisis Miles, Huberman, dan Saldana. Hikmah, 20(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.24952/hik.v20i1.19896

Ilma, A., & Rohmah, Z. (2026). Balancing faith and identity: Language policies and practices in Indonesian Muslim families. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 47(1), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2396996

Mahmudah, M., Ahsanuddin, M., Solehudin, M., Hanifansyah, N., Salsabil, A. H., & Fayruza, A. Z. (2026). Dialects, emojis, and engagement: A corpus-based study of Arabic linguistic features in TikTok comments. Asalibuna, 10(1), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.30762/asalibuna.v10i01.8390

Moll, R., & Nielsen, W. (2017). Development and validation of a social media and science learning survey. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 7(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2016.1161255

Mtshweni, B. V., & Silinda, F. T. (2025). Multidimensional perceptions of support and academic motivation: Predicting academic persistence among first-generation Black university students. Transformation in Higher Education, 10, Article a461. https://doi.org/10.4102/the.v10i0.461

Muttakin, K., Agustin, T., Lestari, O. D., Munip, A., Maharani, N., Riyadissolihin, A., & Wathoni, S. (2026). Arabic vocabulary and socio-religious identity in Indonesian Muslim society: A sociolinguistic literature review. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 8(2), 792–825. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v8i2.792-825

Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A. (Eds.). (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874

Penney, D. (2017). Big policies and a small world: An analysis of policy problems and solutions in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 22(5), 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2016.1242066

Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en español: Toward a typology of code-switching. Linguistics, 18(7–8), 581–618. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1980.18.7-8.581

Rizza, M., Amini, R. M., & Reifandra. (2026). The ideal teacher: Professional ethics, digital citizenship, and holistic development. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 8349–8364. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.12361

Rizza, M., Aulawy, M. Z., Maslinah, & Zakariyya, M. (2026). Teachers’ moral resilience in the digital era: Internalizing professional codes and Islamic moral values. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 8558–8587. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.12379

Rizza, M., Qurrotu’Ain, S. J. N., Nurdzakiyyah, R., & Nurfadilah, S. R. (2026). Integrating intellectual, ethical-spiritual, and psychological dimensions of teacher personality in Islamic education. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 8445–8464. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.12366

Syukran, R., Roza, V., & Syafitri, W. (2026). Challenges of integrating translation into communicative language teaching: Lived experiences of English teachers in an Indonesian Islamic primary school. ENGLISH JOURNAL OF INDRAGIRI, 10(2), 708–720. https://doi.org/10.61672/b8b85875

Tresansky, L. M. (2023). A comparison of teacher evaluation systems in New York State and Finland—Are there alternatives to APPR? [Doctoral dissertation, University at Albany, State University of New York]. Scholars Archive. https://doi.org/10.54014/X6C2-T69E

Yahya, Y. K., Mahmudah, U., & Rochma, S. N. (2021). Arabic language as representation of Muslim identity in Indonesia. Lakhomi Journal Scientific Journal of Culture, 2(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.33258/lakhomi.v2i2.473