Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The closure of all Gold’s Gym Indonesia outlets in 2025 left consumers unable to access prepaid membership and personal training services. PT Fit and Health Indonesia’s concurrent Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) proceedings further complicated the fulfillment of their rights. This study examines the company’s legal liability and the remedies available to affected consumers. It employs a normative juridical method and descriptive analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The analysis indicates that the company remains liable for losses arising from its failure to provide the agreed services. Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection requires business actors to compensate consumers for such losses, while the Indonesian Civil Code provides a basis for liability for breach of contract. PKPU does not extinguish this liability, although it affects how consumers may pursue their claims. Available remedies include a class action, registration of claims in the PKPU proceedings, dispute resolution through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK), and reporting alleged criminal violations where the elements of an offence are satisfied. The study clarifies how consumer protection, contractual liability, and PKPU procedures interact when prepaid services cease.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 12192.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Menegazzo E.B. (2027)
    Development of the @Teen Oral Health Website: An Innovative Tool for Oral Health Care Among Adolescents
    Pesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Clinica Integrada, 27
  2. Galante M.L. (2027)
    Global Trends in Dentist Density: Mapping the Past, Shaping the Future
    Pesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Clinica Integrada, 27
  3. Al Khafaji S.Y. (2027)
    Impact of Socioeconomic Determinants on the Prevalence of Traumatic Dental Injury among Primary School Children
    Pesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Clinica Integrada, 27

Article Details

How to Cite
Munawir, A. A., Yuanitasari, D., & Suwandono, A. (2026). Analysis of the Liability of PT Fit and Health Indonesia for the Fulfillment of Consumers' Rights Arising from the Cessation of Gold's Gym Indonesia's Operations under Indonesian Consumer Protection Law. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 7225-7240. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.12192

References

Amelia, S. P., Widiastiwi, A. R., Camilla, G. R., & Tarina, D. D. Y. (2025). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan yang Berakibat Pailitnya Suatu Perusahaan (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Gresik Nomor 1/PDT.SUS-PHI/2022/PN GSK). Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(6), 185–193. https://ojs.daarulhuda.or.id/index.php/MHI/article/view/1576

Aprilian, A. F., Sufiarina, & Wulandari, R. (2024). Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum dengan Petitum Pembatalan Akta Jual Beli (Analisis Putusan No. 122/PDT.G/2022/PN.JAKTIM). Jurnal Nalar Keadilan, 4(1), 1–14. https://jurnal.universitasjakarta.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-fh-unija/article/view/84

Dirgantara, F., Putra, A. R., Darmawan, D., Khayru, R. K., & Wibowo, A. S. (2025). Peran Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Utang Piutang di Indonesia. Lex Stricta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.46839/lexstricta.v4i1.1444

Eleanora, F. N. (2023). Buku Ajar Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Madza Media.

Habib, Y. A., & Gilalo, J. J. (2024). Penyelesaian dan Sanksi atas Tindak Pidana Konsumen terhadap Kejahatan Pelaku Usaha. IBLAM Law Review, 4(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i2.446

Mahmudah, N. (2022). Menelusuri Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Journal of Islamic Family Law, 1(1). https://ejournal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/jiflaw/article/view/358

Maileni, D. A. (2014). Tinjauan Yuridis Tanggungjawab Produk terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Dimensi, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.33373/dms.v3i3.93

Masri, E., Handayani, O., Dhianty, R., & Wahyuni, S. (2023). Buku Ajar Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakad Media Publishing.

Paat, M. M. (2013). Penyidikan terhadap Pelaku Usaha dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana di Bidang Perlindungan Konsumen. Lex Crimen, 2(4). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/3091

Pertiwi, K. E., Sudaryat, S., & Rahmawati, E. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor yang Tidak Mendaftarkan Tagihan terhadap Klausul Perjanjian Perdamaian yang Mengakibatkan Penghapusan Piutang: Studi Kasus Putusan Homologasi Nomor 62/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Niaga Sby. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 2(6), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v2i6.1332

Rahman, A. (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen melalui Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Kota Serang. Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v2i1.573

Saleh, I., Kasim, N. M., & Bakung, D. A. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha terhadap Konsumen. Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, 1(3), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v1i3.543

Setianto, V. Y. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Pribadi Direksi pada Perseroan Terbatas yang Pailit. Mimbar Yustitia: Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 1(2). https://e-jurnal.unisda.ac.id/index.php/mimbar/article/view/1139

Shanty, W. Y. (2023). The Principle of Good Faith in Settlement of Default Disputes Through Judicial Mediation. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 14(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10863

Simbolon, J. S., Fitrian, A., & Widodo, G. H. T. (2026). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Kredit dalam Skema Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang di Indonesia. SINERGI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 3(6), 1762–1772. https://doi.org/10.62335/sinergi.v3i6.2585

Sukmawan, Y. A., & Damayanti, D. (2025). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris sebagai Strategi Penguatan Perspektif Kajian Ilmu Hukum. Notary Law Journal, 4(3), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v4i3.116

Sumarna, D., & Kadriah, A. (2023). Penelitian Kualitatif terhadap Hukum Empiris. Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum, 16(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v16i02.730

Susandi, B., Martam, N. K., & Rahim, D. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha terhadap Kerugian Produk yang Diperdagangkan. Gorontalo Justice Research, 1(1), 74–87. https://jurnal.unigo.ac.id/gjr/article/view/4195

Susantri, Y. (2022). Perlindungan terhadap Hak-Hak Konsumen dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Constituo: Jurnal Riset Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.47498/constituo.v1i1.1210

Suwandono, A., & Yuanitasari, D. (2025). Peningkatan Pemahaman mengenai Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Pembelajaran Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (JP2M), 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33474/jp2m.v6i1.22141

Umboh, A. (2018). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha dalam Pemenuhan Hak Konsumen Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia. Lex Privatum, 6(6). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/21498

Windari, R. A. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Mutlak (Strict Liability) dalam Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v1i1.5013

Zalukhu, S., & Chariansyah, H. (2026). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Empiris dalam Mengkaji Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 11(3), 280–293. https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/pendas/article/view/63625