Analysis of the Liability of PT Fit and Health Indonesia for the Fulfillment of Consumers' Rights Arising from the Cessation of Gold's Gym Indonesia's Operations under Indonesian Consumer Protection Law
Main Article Content
Abstract
The closure of all Gold’s Gym Indonesia outlets in 2025 left consumers unable to access prepaid membership and personal training services. PT Fit and Health Indonesia’s concurrent Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) proceedings further complicated the fulfillment of their rights. This study examines the company’s legal liability and the remedies available to affected consumers. It employs a normative juridical method and descriptive analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The analysis indicates that the company remains liable for losses arising from its failure to provide the agreed services. Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection requires business actors to compensate consumers for such losses, while the Indonesian Civil Code provides a basis for liability for breach of contract. PKPU does not extinguish this liability, although it affects how consumers may pursue their claims. Available remedies include a class action, registration of claims in the PKPU proceedings, dispute resolution through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK), and reporting alleged criminal violations where the elements of an offence are satisfied. The study clarifies how consumer protection, contractual liability, and PKPU procedures interact when prepaid services cease.

Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Menegazzo E.B. (2027)Development of the @Teen Oral Health Website: An Innovative Tool for Oral Health Care Among AdolescentsPesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Clinica Integrada, 27
-
Galante M.L. (2027)Global Trends in Dentist Density: Mapping the Past, Shaping the FuturePesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Clinica Integrada, 27
-
Al Khafaji S.Y. (2027)Impact of Socioeconomic Determinants on the Prevalence of Traumatic Dental Injury among Primary School ChildrenPesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Clinica Integrada, 27
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Amelia, S. P., Widiastiwi, A. R., Camilla, G. R., & Tarina, D. D. Y. (2025). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan yang Berakibat Pailitnya Suatu Perusahaan (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Gresik Nomor 1/PDT.SUS-PHI/2022/PN GSK). Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(6), 185–193. https://ojs.daarulhuda.or.id/index.php/MHI/article/view/1576
Aprilian, A. F., Sufiarina, & Wulandari, R. (2024). Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum dengan Petitum Pembatalan Akta Jual Beli (Analisis Putusan No. 122/PDT.G/2022/PN.JAKTIM). Jurnal Nalar Keadilan, 4(1), 1–14. https://jurnal.universitasjakarta.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-fh-unija/article/view/84
Dirgantara, F., Putra, A. R., Darmawan, D., Khayru, R. K., & Wibowo, A. S. (2025). Peran Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Utang Piutang di Indonesia. Lex Stricta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.46839/lexstricta.v4i1.1444
Eleanora, F. N. (2023). Buku Ajar Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Madza Media.
Habib, Y. A., & Gilalo, J. J. (2024). Penyelesaian dan Sanksi atas Tindak Pidana Konsumen terhadap Kejahatan Pelaku Usaha. IBLAM Law Review, 4(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i2.446
Mahmudah, N. (2022). Menelusuri Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Journal of Islamic Family Law, 1(1). https://ejournal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/jiflaw/article/view/358
Maileni, D. A. (2014). Tinjauan Yuridis Tanggungjawab Produk terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Dimensi, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.33373/dms.v3i3.93
Masri, E., Handayani, O., Dhianty, R., & Wahyuni, S. (2023). Buku Ajar Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakad Media Publishing.
Paat, M. M. (2013). Penyidikan terhadap Pelaku Usaha dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana di Bidang Perlindungan Konsumen. Lex Crimen, 2(4). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/3091
Pertiwi, K. E., Sudaryat, S., & Rahmawati, E. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor yang Tidak Mendaftarkan Tagihan terhadap Klausul Perjanjian Perdamaian yang Mengakibatkan Penghapusan Piutang: Studi Kasus Putusan Homologasi Nomor 62/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Niaga Sby. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 2(6), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v2i6.1332
Rahman, A. (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen melalui Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Kota Serang. Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v2i1.573
Saleh, I., Kasim, N. M., & Bakung, D. A. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha terhadap Konsumen. Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, 1(3), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v1i3.543
Setianto, V. Y. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Pribadi Direksi pada Perseroan Terbatas yang Pailit. Mimbar Yustitia: Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 1(2). https://e-jurnal.unisda.ac.id/index.php/mimbar/article/view/1139
Shanty, W. Y. (2023). The Principle of Good Faith in Settlement of Default Disputes Through Judicial Mediation. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 14(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10863
Simbolon, J. S., Fitrian, A., & Widodo, G. H. T. (2026). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Kredit dalam Skema Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang di Indonesia. SINERGI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 3(6), 1762–1772. https://doi.org/10.62335/sinergi.v3i6.2585
Sukmawan, Y. A., & Damayanti, D. (2025). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris sebagai Strategi Penguatan Perspektif Kajian Ilmu Hukum. Notary Law Journal, 4(3), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v4i3.116
Sumarna, D., & Kadriah, A. (2023). Penelitian Kualitatif terhadap Hukum Empiris. Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum, 16(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v16i02.730
Susandi, B., Martam, N. K., & Rahim, D. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha terhadap Kerugian Produk yang Diperdagangkan. Gorontalo Justice Research, 1(1), 74–87. https://jurnal.unigo.ac.id/gjr/article/view/4195
Susantri, Y. (2022). Perlindungan terhadap Hak-Hak Konsumen dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Constituo: Jurnal Riset Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.47498/constituo.v1i1.1210
Suwandono, A., & Yuanitasari, D. (2025). Peningkatan Pemahaman mengenai Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Pembelajaran Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (JP2M), 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33474/jp2m.v6i1.22141
Umboh, A. (2018). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha dalam Pemenuhan Hak Konsumen Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia. Lex Privatum, 6(6). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/21498
Windari, R. A. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Mutlak (Strict Liability) dalam Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v1i1.5013
Zalukhu, S., & Chariansyah, H. (2026). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Empiris dalam Mengkaji Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 11(3), 280–293. https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/pendas/article/view/63625


















