Validity of an Interactive E-Student Worksheet (E-LKPD) Based on Structured Inquiry Using Liveworksheets on the Reaction Rate Topic for Phase F Grade XI Senior High School

Main Article Content

Ririn Oldia Azzahra
Minda Azhar

Abstract

The reaction rate topic is considered one of the most challenging areas of chemistry because it involves abstract and conceptually complex principles. This study aimed to determine the validity of an interactive electronic student worksheet (E-LKPD) developed for the reaction rate topic using a structured inquiry model and the Liveworksheets platform. The study employed an Educational Design Research approach based on the Plomp model, comprising preliminary research, prototyping, and assessment phases; however, the investigation was limited to the prototyping phase, specifically Prototype III. Validation data obtained from three validators were analyzed using Aiken’s V coefficient. The findings showed an overall average Aiken’s V value of 0.96. Specifically, the E-LKPD achieved validity coefficients of 0.93 for content, 0.96 for presentation, 0.95 for language, 0.98 for graphics, and 0.99 for computer-based features, with all assessed components categorized as valid. These results indicate that the developed E-LKPD satisfies the required content, instructional, linguistic, visual, and technological validity criteria. The study contributes to the development of structured inquiry-based digital learning materials by providing a validated interactive resource for teaching reaction rates. The E-LKPD therefore has the potential to support more interactive chemistry learning and provides a foundation for subsequent studies examining its practicality and effectiveness in classroom implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Citation data unavailable
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Xu J. (2027)
    From Black-Box Generation to Pedagogically Controllable Creation: A Text-to-Image Interactive System in Design Education
    Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 16583 LNAI, 19-26
  2. Li K. (2027)
    Design of a Multimodal and Emotion-Aware Interactive Picture Book System for Children
    Mechanisms and Machine Science, 206, 1784-1801
  3. Sohani A. (2027)
    Comfort-aware design of photovoltaic-based multi-generation energy systems for hotel facilities
    Unconventional Resources, 16

Article Details

How to Cite
Azzahra, R. O., & Azhar, M. (2026). Validity of an Interactive E-Student Worksheet (E-LKPD) Based on Structured Inquiry Using Liveworksheets on the Reaction Rate Topic for Phase F Grade XI Senior High School. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(2), 3316-3330. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i2.11187

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Amalia, D., Zaini, M., & Halang, B. (2022). Kualitas E-LKPD (Elektronik Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik) Konsep Plantae Berbasis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Jenjang SMA. Journal of Mathematics Science and Computer Education, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.20527/jmscedu.v2i1.4768

Andani, M., & Azhar, M. (2023). Pengembangan LKPD Materi Hukum-Hukum Dasar Kimia Berbasis Inkuiri Terstruktur pada Liveworksheet untuk Fase E SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 20225–20232. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/9464

Anggrahini, A., & Rusmini, R. (2022). Improving science process skills and collaboration on the lesson reaction rate using electronic student worksheet assisted with Liveworksheets website. Journal of the Indonesian Society of Integrated Chemistry, 14(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.22437/jisic.v14i1.17859

Augia, L., Copriady, J., & Susilawati, S. (2025). E-LKPD Berbasis Experiential Learning Menggunakan Liveworksheets pada Materi Asam-Basa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 13(2), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v13i2.87663

Borokhovski, E., Bernard, R. M., Tamim, R. M., Schmid, R. F., & Sokolovskaya, A. (2016). Technology-supported student interaction in post-secondary education: A meta-analysis of designed versus contextual treatments. Computers & Education, 96, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.004

Firdaus, M., & Wilujeng, I. (2018). Pengembangan LKPD Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i1.5574

Hidayah, N., Jatmiko, B., & Madlazim. (2023). Development of inquiry-based electronic student worksheets (E-LKPD) to improve students’ critical thinking skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 27(31), 421–443.

Iyengar, R., Diverse-Pierluissi, M. A., Jenkins, S. L., Chan, A. M., Devi, L. A., Sobie, E. A., Ting, A. T., & Weinstein, D. C. (2008). Inquiry learning: Integrating content detail and critical reasoning by peer review. Science, 319(5867), 1189–1190. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149875

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2020 tentang Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Tahun 2020–2024. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/224226/permendikbudriset-no-13-tahun-2022

Kirani, P., & Azhar, M. (2023). Pengembangan Sistem Pembelajaran Flipped Classroom Berbasis Inkuiri Terstruktur Menggunakan LMS Moodle pada Materi Laju Reaksi Kelas XI SMA/MA. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(2), 16292–16302. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/8948

Mardhatillah, T., & Aini, S. (2025). Analisis Kebutuhan Media Pembelajaran LKPD Berbasis Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Liveworksheet pada Materi Ikatan Kimia. SCIENCE: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 5(4), 1922–1933. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v5i4.7546

Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research: Part A: An introduction (pp. 152–169). SLO. https://slo.nl/publish/pages/2904/educational-design-research-part-a.pdf

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2013). Educational design research: Part A: An introduction. SLO. https://slo.nl/publish/pages/2904/educational-design-research-part-a.pdf

Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w

Sari, R. P., Anwar, Y., & Erman. (2021). Development of electronic student worksheets (E-LKPD) based on guided inquiry to improve students’ scientific literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 14(1), 2078–2091.

Shafnahriyah, Z., & Sukarmin, S. (2026). E-worksheet assisted by Liveworksheets: Innovation in learning media for chemical bonds based on ethnoscience to improve critical thinking skills of high school students. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v9i1.30344

Zainuddin, Z., Haruna, H., Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2019). A systematic review of flipped classroom empirical evidence from different fields: What are the gaps and future trends? On the Horizon, 27(2), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-09-2018-0027

Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383–399. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1001631


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.