The Continuous Evaluation and Improvement of Exit Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Review

Crossmark

Article Sidebar

Page Numbers: 114-125
Download PDF
Published: Mar 28, 2025
Digital Object Identifier:
Save this to:
Save to Mendeley Download RIS

Article Metrics:
Viewed: 356 times
Downloaded: 305 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (USD 0.00)
Check for article on SINTA:

LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers

Connected Papers:
Connected Papers


Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.


Authors:
Samson Worku Teshome1*
Copyright :

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.

Explore Our Journals
Find the journal that best fits your research. If this journal does not match your manuscript’s scope, explore our portfolio below to select a more suitable publication venue.

Main Article Content

Samson Worku Teshome
Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

Abstract

Exit exams in higher education have become a significant tool for assessing the competencies of students and ensuring quality assurance. This systematic literature review examines the continuous evaluation and improvement of exit exams, focusing on their role in enhancing educational outcomes and employability opportunities. Utilizing the PRISMA framework and PICO methodology, this review synthesizes findings from 29 studies spanning various disciplines and geographical regions. The results reveal diverse approaches to improving exit exams, emphasizing feedback mechanisms, curriculum alignment, and technological advancements. A narrative analysis highlights the complexities and benefits of implementing such evaluations. This review concludes that while exit exams can enhance accountability and quality, they require careful design and continuous refinement to address challenges like equity and validity.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 5272.pdf
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Almardini A.A.W.H. (2027)
    Interlaminar shear behaviour of additively manufactured continuous fibre-reinforced composites using MWCNT-coated filaments
    Advanced Nanocomposites, 4, 21-38
  2. Lukpanov R.E. (2027)
    Evaluation of the Effect of Additives on the Workability of Concrete Mix as Part of a Study of a Modified Wall Block
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 342(3), 100-110
  3. Zhou M. (2027)
    Continuous Fabrication of Bioinspired All-Biomass Aerogel Fibers for Thermal Insulation
    Nano Micro Letters, 19(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Teshome, S. W. (2025). The Continuous Evaluation and Improvement of Exit Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. EDUMALSYS Journal of Research in Education Management, 3(1), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.58578/edumalsys.v3i1.5272
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

References

Ackeren, I. V., et al. (2012). The impact of statewide exit exams: A descriptive case study of three German states with differing low-stakes exam regimes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(8), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v20n8.2012

Adale, M. Y., & Kefale, K. B. (2023). A review on implementation challenges and measures of exit exam to enhance and assure the quality of engineering education at Ethiopia HEIs. Journal of Higher Education Research, 8(5), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20230806.13

Al Ahmad, M., Al Marzouqi, A. H., & Hussien, M. (2014). Exit exam as academic performance indicator. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(3), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICeLeTE.2013.6644378

Aniley, A. A. (2023). Comprehensive review on exit examination strategies and its role for enhancement of quality assurance and employability opportunity in engineering and technology programs. IETE Journal of Education, 64(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09747338.2022.2118874

Aristeidou, M., Cross, S., Rossade, K.-D., Wood, C., Rees, T., & Paci, P. (2024). Online exams in higher education: Exploring distance learning students' acceptance and satisfaction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12888

Athiworakun, C., & Adunyarittigun, D. (2022). Investigating washback effects on teaching: A case study of an exit examination at the higher education level. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 777–800. http://so04.tci-thaijo.org

Ayenew, E., & Yohannes, A. G. (2022). Assessing higher education exit exam in Ethiopia: Practices, challenges and prospects. Science Journal of Education, 10(2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20221002.15

Bishop, J. (1999). Are national exit examinations important for educational efficiency? Swedish Economic Policy Review, 6, 349–398. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/75286

Bracey, G. (2009). Mandatory exit exams discourage graduation: Research does not support political claims that exit exams improve graduation results. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(3), 88–95.

Carol, A. V., & Brown, M. F. (1994). The development of an exit examination in criminal justice for graduating seniors: A case study. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 5(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511259400083081

Christina, J. J., & Moorthy, D. (2021). Multiple entry and exit options in degree courses. NEP 2020, 135–141. https://www.SematicScholar.net/publication/373069856

Dehury, R. (2017). Exit exams for medical graduates: A guarantee of quality? Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 2(3), 190–193. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2017.037

Dempster, E. (2012). Comparison of exit-level examinations in four African countries. Journal of Social Sciences, 33, 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2012.11893086

El-Hussan, H., et al. (2021). Student perception of curriculum-based exit exam in civil engineering education. Global Engineering Education Conference, 214–218. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9454016

French, S. (2023). A review of the benefits and drawbacks of high-stakes final examinations in higher education. The International Journal of Higher Education, 88, 893–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01148-z

Hughes, F. (2001). The Achilles heel of university-industry partnerships. Annual Conference Proceedings, 6.980.1–6.980.5. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--8883

Houchensen, D. (2023). Stakes is high: Culturally relevant practitioner inquiry with African American students struggling to pass secondary reading exit exams. Urban Education, 48(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912456845

Khan, H., Sebu, Gaur, P., Kumar, A., & Rahman, M. ur. (2023). Pharmacy exit exam for the upliftment of profession of pharmacy practice in India: A review. International Journal of Pharma Professional's Research, 14(4), 107–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.48165/ijppronline.2023.14408

Lanahan, B. (2023). Higher education in as politics in Poar-Rose Revolution in Georgia. Corruption, Tutoring, and Higher Education Entrance Exams, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45194-2_8

Leigh, S. (2012). The classroom is alive with the sound of thinking: The power of the exit slip. The International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 189–196. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/

Merki, K. (2011). Effects of the implementation of state-wide exit exams on students' self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 196–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.12.001

Pioplunink, M. (2013). Central school exit exams and labor-market outcomes. European Journal of Political Economy, 31, 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.04.005

Rosqvist, K., Koivisto, J. M., Vierula, J., & Haavisto, E. (2022). Instruments used in graduating nursing students' exit exams: An integrative review. Contemporary Nurse, 58(5–6), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2022.2085593

Siddiqui, A. W., Singh, D., Samanta, R., Das, A. M., & Chhetri, P. (2020). Evaluating the role of pharmacy exit exams in advancing pharmacy practice in India: A comprehensive review. Latin American Journal of Pharmacy, 42(10), 1–11.

Slomp, D., Marynowski, R., & Ratcliffe, B. (2020). Consequences and outcomes of policies governing medium-stakes large-scale exit exams. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 431–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09334-8

Teshome, S. W. (2024). Exit exams in higher education: A systematic literature review. Science Journal of Education, 12(4), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20241204.14

University of Munich, & Woessmann, L. (2018). Central exit exams improve student outcomes. IZA World of Labor, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.419

Warren, J. R., & Grodsky, E. (2009). Exit exams harm students who fail them—and don't benefit students who pass them. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 645–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000908

Weir, T. (2010). Pretest/posttest assessment: The use of an entry/exit exam as an assessment tool for accredited and non-accredited journalism and mass communication programs. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 65(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769581006500203