A Critical Review of Virtual Communities and Social Media in Framing the Case of Persecution against Gus Fuad Plered
Main Article Content
Abstract
Religious thought diversity in Indonesia frequently generates tensions, as illustrated by the 2023 persecution of KH Muhamad Fuad Riyadi (Gus Fuad Plered) in Bantul, Yogyakarta, by conservative groups such as Front Jihad Islam (FJI). This study analyzes the digital framing of this incident on YouTube by addressing three questions: (1) how media narratives and comments frame the incident; (2) how Mohammed Arkoun’s deconstruction problematizes conservative responses; and (3) what implications arise for religious pluralism. Employing qualitative framing analysis based on Entman (1993) and deconstruction following Arkoun (1984, 2002), the study thematically codes data from two viral videos (with more than 822,000 views) and 1,000 netizen comments across four dimensions: problem definition, causal diagnosis, moral judgment, and treatment recommendation. Purposive sampling is used to capture peak discourse, and triangulation strengthens the validity of the analysis. The findings show that the conflict is framed as intra-Muslim friction over amar ma'ruf nahi munkar, with Gus Fuad’s critique of habib figures reframed as symbolic blasphemy; the causes are linked to epistemological divides concerning religious authority, intensified by platform algorithms; moral judgments predominantly condemn violence as violating Islamic adab; and proposed solutions emphasize dialogue and digital literacy. Through Arkoun’s lens, the study reveals dogmatic rigidity that obstructs contextual ijtihad and constrains pluralistic engagement. The study concludes that social media functions as a polarizing arena in post-FPI religious conflicts while simultaneously providing a space for counter-framing that supports pluralism, thereby advancing the literature on digital religious communication and underscoring the need for Islamic organizations to promote multidisciplinary da'wah and media education to foster tolerance within Indonesia’s diverse ummah.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Allie, S. (2020). Exploring the concept of conciliation (Sulḥ) as a method of alternative dispute resolution in Islamic law. University of the Western Cape.
Arkoun, M. (2006). Islam: To reform or to subvert? Saqi Books.
Asmara, A. H. D. (2020). Educating for unity in diversity: Religious education for transformation in the context of everyday religious conflict in post-authoritarian Indonesia. Fordham University.
Dacey, A. (2012). Future of blasphemy: Speaking of the sacred in an age of human rights. A&C Black.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Hadi, F. (2023). Anggota FPI yang Dipukul Ancam Bikin Perhitungan, Rumah Gus Fuad Plered Dijaga Ketat Banser. Warta Kota. https://wartakota.tribunnews.com/2023/03/22/anggota-fpi-yang-dipukul-ancam-bikin-perhitungan-rumah-gus-fuad-pleret-dijaga-ketat-banser
Harian Surya. (2024). Video Suasana Persekusi terhadap Gus Fuad [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/iG2eVrR2y7E?si=9-rr87hA1HYulMXr
Hilmy, M. (2010). Islamism and democracy in Indonesia: Piety and pragmatism. Utopia Press.
Ibrahim, A. (2014). Contemporary Islamic discourse in the Malay-Indonesian world: Critical perspectives. Gerak Budaya Ebook.
Joseph, C. L. (2015). The arrogance of faith and religious imperialism: Soyinka’s radical theistic humanism and generous tolerance. The Journal of Pan African Studies, 8(5), 19–63. https://www.jpanafrican.org/docs/vol8no5/8.5-5-Joseph.pdf [Broken link]
Khalim, A. D. N. (2025). The mosque as the centre of the Islamic political movement: Uncovering Al-Faruqi’s strategic vision in the contemporary era. Dirasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1). https://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/index.php/dirasah/article/view/11418 [Broken link]
Khalim, A. D. N., & Parut, W. (2025). Paradigma and programs multicultural education in inclusive madrasah. Journal of Contemporary Islamic Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.25217/jcie.v5i1.5115
KumparanNews. (2023). Viral Gus Fuad Plered Diserang Tamunya, Ini Penjelasan Kapolres Bantul. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/viral-gus-fuad-plered-diserang-tamunya-ini-penjelasan-kapolres-bantul-203g0lGt8Ld/full
Mate, M. (2017). Judicial supremacy in comparative constitutional law. Tulane Law Review, 92, 393–467. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/1229/
Mudhofi, M., Supena, I., Adeni, Madya, & Suyurno, S. bin H. (2025). Shaping the Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jama’ah thoughts in the online realm: The case of Indonesia and Malaysia. PT Nasya Expanding Management.
Muhtarom, H., & Ichsan, A. S. (2025). Rohis movement at two senior high schools of Yogyakarta in actualizing the hijrah text of Qur’an verses in Islamic education book. Chalim Journal of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.31538/cjotl.v5i1.2134
Prass, A. B. (2025). Mengenal Lebih Jauh Gus Fuad Plered, Ulama Keturunan Pejuang dan Nasionalis. KR Jogja. https://www.krjogja.com/sosok/1245893983/mengenal-lebih-jauh-gus-fuad-plered-ulama-keturunan-pejuang-dan-nasionalis
Pratama, M. Y., & Annuha, A. N. (2024). Digital da’wah transformation of Nahdlatul Ulama: Religious moderation strategies in the technological era. Nahnu, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.63875/nahnu.v2i2.53
Purniawan, A. (2023a). Gus Fuad Plered Bantul Jadi Korban Pemukulan Oknum Ormas FPI. Suara Merdeka. https://sport.suaramerdeka.com/news/9768137196/gus-fuad-plered-bantul-jadi-korban-pemukulan-oknum-ormas-fpi
Purniawan, A. (2023b). Profil Gus Fuad Plered Bantul, Kiai NU yang Masih Garis Keturunan Sunan Bonang. Suara Merdeka. https://sport.suaramerdeka.com/news/9768208025/profil-gus-fuad-plered-bantul-kiai-nu-yang-masih-garis-keturunan-sunan-bonang
Rosidah, G. R., Syamil, A., Hurit, R. U., Asman, A., Lestariningsih, Radjawane, L. E., Bagenda, C., Amane, N. F. P. O., Saloom, C. P. T., S, S., Fadhilatunisa, N. B. G., & Fakhri, M. M. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan Kombinasi (S. Bahri, Ed.). CV Media Sains Indonesia.
Rozalikij. (2024). Video Pendek Aksi FJI dalam Persekusi terhadap Gus Fuad [Video]. YouTube. https://youtube.com/shorts/kAQ0CoFFkVI?si=v2_JeGaMZEll_iVZ
Rusdi, M. (2021). Penanganan Intoleransi oleh Pemerintah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Widya Pranata Hukum, 3(1), 129–145. https://ejournal.widyamataram.ac.id.prosiding-uwm.com/index.php/pranata/article/view/266 [Broken link]
Salazar, H. G. (2023). Beyond the Bible, beyond the West: The “eros” of interpretation. Mimesis.
Sebastian, L. C., Hasyim, S., & Arifianto, A. R. (2021). Rising Islamic conservatism in Indonesia. Routledge.
Talamanca, F., & Arfini, S. (2022). Through the newsfeed glass: Rethinking filter bubbles and echo chambers. Philosophy & Technology, 35, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00494-z
Whyte, S. A. (2024). Islamic religious authority in a modern age. Springer Nature.
Wildan, M., Saleh, M., & Aqodiah, A. (2023). Kontestasi Ideologi Bahasa dalam Pemilihan Presiden 2019 pada Pola Horizontal, Vertikal, dan Individual. Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 8(2), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v8i2.11306
Zuhri, A. M. (2022). Teologi Islam Moderat di Indonesia Kontemporer: Kontestasi Populisme Islam dan Otoritas Keagamaan di Media Sosial. Nawa Litera Publishing.




















