Analisis Kemampuan Dosen dalam Menyusun RPS Berbasis Outcome-Based Education Analysis of Lecturers’ Ability in Preparing RPS Based on Outcome-Based Education
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
190-201
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/alsys.v6i1.8420
Viewed: 155 times
Downloaded: 155 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Yusranida Hidayati1*, Siti Halimah2, Laila Fathimah3, Ilham Putra Pratama4, Muhammad Sofwan5 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although the implementation of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) has received considerable attention in higher education research, studies that specifically examine lecturers’ ability to design OBE-based Semester Learning Plans (Rencana Pembelajaran Semester, RPS) for Islamic Religious Education courses remain limited. This study aimed to analyze lecturers’ ability to develop an OBE-based RPS for the course Evaluation of Islamic Religious Education Learning. The study employed a qualitative approach with a document analysis design, involving a single RPS document as the primary data source. Data were collected through a systematic document review using an OBE-based RPS analysis instrument and were analyzed with descriptive–analytical techniques. The findings indicate that the lecturer’s ability to design an OBE-based RPS falls into the “good” category, as reflected in the alignment between learning outcomes, instructional strategies, and assessment techniques. Nevertheless, several components still require refinement, particularly in formulating measurable performance indicators and clarifying the explicit linkage between Course Learning Outcomes (Capaian Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah, CPMK), learning activities, and assessment. These findings contribute to the development of the concept of OBE implementation in higher education and extend understanding of instructional planning practices in the context of Islamic Religious Education. The study concludes that the clarity of learning outcome indicators plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of OBE-based instructional planning and recommends strengthening the capacity of lecturers and study programs in developing outcome-oriented RPS documents. The implications of this research include theoretical contributions to enriching the OBE literature and practical implications for higher education institutions in improving the quality of instructional planning, while also opening avenues for further studies on the alignment between OBE-based planning and classroom implementation.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Alam, N., & Mustakim, M. (2021). Islamic education and outcome-based learning in higher education. Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 6(2), 101–115.
Anwar, S. (2021). Paradigma Baru Penilaian Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(2), 145–158.
Basuki, I., & Hariyanto, H. (2021). Asesmen Pembelajaran. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Bloom, B. S. (2019). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson Education.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. (2021). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi Berbasis Outcome-Based Education (OBE). Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://dikti.kemdikbud.go.id
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fadhilah, N. (2022). Authentic assessment in Islamic education learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 19(1), 55–70.
Harden, R. M. (2007). Outcome-based education: The future is today. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 625–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701729930
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kumar, P., & Kumar, A. (2020). Outcome-based education: An overview. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 3(2), 245–250.
Kunandar. (2021). Penilaian Autentik. Rajawali Press.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Rahman, A., & Yusof, M. (2023). Student-centered learning in outcome-based education. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16105
Yusuf, M. (2020). Authentic assessment in higher education. Journal of Educational Assessment, 8(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.17509/jea.v8i1.2020