Tinjauan Maqashid Syariah terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Hadhonah Anak Pasca Perceraian pada Keluarga Gen Z di Kecamatan Bogor Barat, Kota Bogor Maqashid Syariah Review of the Fulfillment of Children’s Hadhonah Rights after Divorce among Gen Z Families in Bogor Barat District, Bogor City

Crossmark

Article Sidebar

Page Numbers: 2559-2576
Download PDF
Published: Aug 7, 2026
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/alsys.v6i5.11707
Save this to:
Save to Mendeley Download RIS

Article Metrics:
Viewed: 0 times
Downloaded: 0 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (USD 0.00)
Check for article on SINTA:

LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers

Connected Papers:
Connected Papers


Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.


Authors:
Arkam Arkian Liburaya1*
Copyright :

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.

Explore Our Journals
Find the journal that best fits your research. If this journal does not match your manuscript’s scope, explore our portfolio below to select a more suitable publication venue.

Main Article Content

Arkam Arkian Liburaya
Institut Agama Islam Al-Hidayah Bogor

Abstract

Although children’s hadhanah rights following divorce have been widely examined from the perspective of Islamic family law, studies specifically analyzing their fulfillment in Generation Z families through Legal Protection Theory and Maqāṣid asy-Syarī‘ah remain limited. This study aimed to analyze the practice of fulfilling children’s hadhanah rights in Generation Z families following divorce, the factors influencing their fulfillment, and their conformity with the objectives of Maqāṣid asy-Syarī‘ah. The study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design and involved four informants selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation and were subsequently analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, which comprises data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. The findings showed that formal hadhanah rights rested with the mother, but daily caregiving was predominantly undertaken by the grandparents because economic demands required the mother to work. The father’s involvement in caregiving and the provision of child maintenance remained low, while economic conditions, parental emotional unpreparedness, and digital device use were factors influencing the implementation of hadhanah. From the perspective of Maqāṣid asy-Syarī‘ah, the fulfillment of hadhanah rights partially realized welfare, particularly in the preservation of religion (hifẓ al-dīn) and the fulfillment of the child’s physical needs (hifẓ al-nafs), but was not yet optimal in ensuring the child’s psychological protection and intellectual development (hifẓ al-‘aql). These findings contribute to the development of Philipus M. Hadjon’s Legal Protection Theory by integrating the principle of the best interest of the child and Maqāṣid asy-Syarī‘ah in assessing the effectiveness of fulfilling hadhanah rights following divorce. This study affirms the importance of strengthening the responsibilities of both parents and the effectiveness of legal protection to ensure the substantive fulfillment of children’s rights.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Citation data unavailable from the configured source
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Bahori A. (2026)
    AN ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE SENTENCING FOR YOUNG OFFENDERS UNDER SYARIAH CRIMINAL LAW IN MALAYSIA AND BRUNEI
    Uum Journal of Legal Studies, 17(2), 18-31
  2. Ismail S.Z. (2026)
    THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE NIK ELIN CASE ON THE JURISDICTION AND STATUS OF SHARIAH CRIMINAL OFFENCES
    Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 14(1), 278-296
  3. Mohamad A.H.H. (2026)
    Mapping global scholarship on Islamic family law through analysis of marriage divorce and family relations in Muslim societies
    Discover Global Society, 4(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Liburaya, A. A. (2026). Tinjauan Maqashid Syariah terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Hadhonah Anak Pasca Perceraian pada Keluarga Gen Z di Kecamatan Bogor Barat, Kota Bogor. ALSYS, 6(5), 2559-2576. https://doi.org/10.58578/alsys.v6i5.11707

Creative Commons License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

References

Asman, A. (2023). Parents’ obligations on hadhanah before mumayyiz after divorce: Review of normative legal studies. ADHKI: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37876/adhki.v4i1.83

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Nikah dan Cerai Menurut Provinsi (Kejadian). https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/3/VkhwVUszTXJPVmQ2ZFRKamNIZG9RMVo2VEdsbVVUMDkjMw==/nikah-dan-cerai-menurut-provinsi.html

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Barat. (2025). Jumlah Perceraian Menurut Kabupaten/Kota dan Faktor Penyebab Perceraian (Perkara) di Provinsi Jawa Barat. https://jabar.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/3/YVdoU1IwVmlTM2h4YzFoV1psWkViRXhqTlZwRFVUMDkjMw%3D%3D/jumlah-perceraian-menurut-kabupaten-kota-dan-faktor-di-provinsi-jawa-barat--2022.html

Fardindaputri, F. ‘A., & Hasanudin, F. (2025). Legal protection of children’s rights post-divorce: A study of single mothers in Malang Regency. Prophetic Law Review, 7(1), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss1.art4

Farid, M., Albani, M. S., & Lubis, F. (2025). Legal reconstruction of hadhanah rights due to divorce in Indonesia from a maqashid syari’ah perspective. Jurnal Akta, 12(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v12i1.43809

Fiantika, F. R., Wasil, M., Jumiyati, S., Honesti, L., Wahyuni, S., Mouw, E., Jonata, Mashudi, I., Hasanah, N., Maharani, A., Ambarwati, K., Noflidaputri, R., Nuryami, & Waris, L. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Global Eksekutif Teknologi.

Habibi, A. R. (2026, February 4). Pergeseran Filosofi Kewenangan Hakim dalam Penetapan Hadhanah Pasca SEMA 1 Tahun 2025. MariNews. https://marinews.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/kewenangan-hakim-dalam-penetapan-hadhanah-pasca-sema-1-2025-0P1

Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Bina Ilmu.

Haiba, S. N. M., & Nugraheni, A. S. C. (2024). Penetapan Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian Berdasarkan Asas Kepentingan Terbaik Anak. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i2.84

Hamdia, H., Amin, M., & Juhriati, J. (2026). Perlindungan Hukum Preventif dan Represif terhadap Hak Anak dalam Sengketa Hadhanah. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 8(2), 941–957. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v8i2.12870

Hanif, H. A., Salsabila, A. N., & Hubur, A. A. (2023). The concept of hadhanah (child custody) after divorce in Islamic civil law. Al Irsyad: Jurnal Studi Islam, 2(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.54150/alirsyad.v2i2.177

Hidayat, M., Husnaldi, M., & Nasrullah, N. (2025). Optimalisasi Pembekalan Pranikah melalui Inisiasi Pengelolaan Biro Jodoh Terintegrasi BIMWIN: Analisis Yuridis Normatif. Al-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial, 13(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v13i02.7484

Hidayat, M., & Yuspiain, A. (2025). Pergeseran Tujuan Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian di Era Digital. Al-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial, 13(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v13i01.8232

Kadarisman, A., Fedro, A., & Arifin, Z. (2025). Best interest of the child in Islamic family law: Integrating maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah and double movement theory in ḥaḍānah cases. Jurnal Al-Dustur, 8(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.30863/aldustur.v8i2.10459

Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia. (2024). Laporan Akhir Tahun 2024 KPAI: Penguatan Pengawasan dan Perlindungan Anak di Indonesia. https://www.kpai.go.id/laporan/laporan-akhir-tahun-2024-kpai-penguatan-pengawasan-dan-perlindungan-anak-di-indonesia

Putri, M. M., & A’isyah. (2026). Post-divorce childcare collaboration: Contextual hadhanah in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ahwal Syakhshiyyah (JAS), 8(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.33474/jas.v8i1.25229

Putri, V. S., & Chami, Y. (2025). Executing hadhanah decisions in Indonesia’s religious courts: Islamic legal principles, child welfare, and multicultural challenges. Kawanua International Journal of Multicultural Studies, 6(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.30984/kijms.v6i2.1841

Putri, V. S., Judiasih, S. D., & Kusmayanti, H. (2026). The best interest of the child in Islamic family law: Declarative and enforceable custody protection in Indonesia and Malaysia. International Journal of Nusantara Islam, 14(1), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v14i1.54393

Radesky, J., & Hiniker, A. (2022). From moral panic to systemic change: Making child-centered design the default. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 31, Article 100351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100351

Rahmani, I., & Sayuti, H. (2025). Integrasi Nilai Islam dan Budaya Lokal terhadap Hak Asuh Anak Pascaperceraian Perspektif Hukum Islam. Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam, 14(3), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.30651/mqsd.v14i3.28819

Sururie, R. W., Hopipah, E. N., Witro, D., Diana, R., & Sopiyan, M. (2024). Co-parenting model in resolving child custody disputes in urban Muslim families. PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah, 9(1), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i1.277

Syarafuddin, M., Beatrice, G., Jauhar, G., Rohman, G. D., & Putra, H. M. (2026). Between duty, capacity, and inability: Post-divorce child support in Indonesian religious courts. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law, 9(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.35719/8sjf7s13

Taufiqurohman, & Fauziah, N. (2023). The evaluation of maqāṣid asy-syarī’ah on discourses of the Islamic family law. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 6(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v6i1.13035

Zainal Abidin, R., Alias, M. N., & Wakhidah, N. (2024). The importance of applied behavior analysis (ABA) therapy in nurturing children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) according to maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 7(2), 742–767. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i2.26607