Analisis Perbedaan Daluwarsa dan Pelepasan Hak dalam Hukum Waris Ditinjau dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Analysis of Differences between Limitation and Waiver of Rights in Inheritance Law as Viewed from Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
458-470
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i1.9141
Viewed: 178 times
Downloaded: 132 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Putri Mutia1*, Nuzul Rahmayani2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although studies on daluwarsa have been widely conducted, research that specifically unpacks the ambiguity between daluwarsa and pelepasan hak in civil inheritance disputes remains limited, even though these are two legal institutions that are frequently conflated yet carry very different legal consequences in practice. This study aims to analyze the fundamental differences between daluwarsa (verjaring) and pelepasan hak (rechtsverwerking) in the Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata) and to examine their implications for the legal standing of heirs. The research employs a normative juridical method with a prescriptive and sui generis approach. Data were collected through literature study of regulations and scholarly works, as well as analysis of Decision No. 12/Pdt.G/2022/PN Pal and Supreme Court Cassation Decision No. 4866 K/Pdt/2024. The results show that daluwarsa operates mechanistically based on the passage of time, whereas pelepasan hak requires an element of awareness and volition on the part of the heirs, such that judicial error in distinguishing between these two institutions may eliminate the heirs’ absolute rights in the name of administrative certainty. The study concludes that an in-depth analysis of the boundaries, characteristics, and consequences of each concept of daluwarsa and pelepasan hak is crucial to clarifying the legal standing of heirs in inheritance disputes under the KUHPerdata. The implications of this research contribute to legal practice by guiding practitioners in applying more humane substantive justice in inheritance cases.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Adi, R. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Hukum. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Adiem, M., Yaqin, H., Wahib, M., & Islamy, A. (2022). Dimensi Maqasid Syariah dalam Putusan Hakim atas Perkara Cerai Gugat di Pengadilan Agama Jayapura. Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum, 20(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.32694/qst.v20i2.2373
Anam, M. A., & Farida, Y. E. (2023). Pengasuhan Anak Pasca Perceraian dalam Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika, 4(3), 1649–1656. https://ojs.cahayamandalika.com/index.php/jcm/article/view/2428
Ardianto, M. A., Syamsuri, S., & Yusuf, M. W. (2025). Refleksi terhadap Tujuan Hukum dengan Delik Aduan dalam Pasal 284 KUHP tentang Perzinahan Perspektif Maqashid Syari’ah. AHKAM: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Humaniora, 4(4), 1648–1662. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v4i4.8182
Ariawan, I. G. K. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Kertha Widya, 1(1), 21–30. https://ejournal.unipas.ac.id/index.php/KW/article/view/419
Febiana, F. (2018). Perceraian dengan Alasan Ekonomi Perspektif Maqashid Syariah. Journal Equitable, 3(1), 98–111. https://ejurnal.umri.ac.id/index.php/JEQ/article/view/813
Firdaus, F., Desminar, D., & Anggreni, I. (2025). Keabsahan Talak melalui Media Sosial dalam Putusan Nomor 101/Pdt.G/2013/PAJB: Analisis Yuridis dalam Perspektif Fikih Kontemporer. AHKAM: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Humaniora, 4(2), 712–726. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v4i2.6492
Hartono, R., Sahrir, M., & Jamaluddin, J. (2026). Analisis Kehujjahan Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah sebagai Dasar Ijtihad dalam Menyelesaikan Persoalan Hukum Islam Kontemporer. AHKAM: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Humaniora, 5(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i1.8688
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah. (1997).
Pratama, F. Y. (2012). Daluwarsa Penghapus Hak Milik dalam Sengketa Perdata (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Wates Nomor: 06/PDT.G/2007.PN.WT) [Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/36491
Prodjodikoro, W. (2016). Hukum Warisan di Indonesia. Vorkink-Van Hoeve.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4866 K/Pdt/2024. (2024).
Putusan PN Palu Nomor 12/Pdt.G/2022/PN Pal. (2022).
Ramadan, P., Munir, B., & Amri, A. (2025). Tinjauan Maqasid Syariah terhadap Penolakan Hakim dalam Gugatan Hak Asuh Anak bagi Ayah ataupun Ibu. Al Fuadiy Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 7(2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.55606/af.v7i2.1674
Sinaga, A. J. (2020). Paradigma Hukum Waris atas Tanah yang Tidak Mengenal Daluarsa Setelah Terbitnya UUPA. Fiat Iustitia: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.54367/fiat.v1i1.901
Subekti, R. (2010). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Intermasa.
Sunarto, M. Z. (2019). Mediasi dalam Perspektif Maqashid Syariah: Studi tentang Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama. At-Turāṡ: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 6(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.33650/at-turas.v6i1.573
Suyanto, S. (2020). Hapusnya Hak atas Tanah Akibat Penitipan Ganti Kerugian dalam Pengadaan Tanah untuk Kepentingan Umum. CV Jakad Publishing.