Studi Analisis Putusan Hakim tentang Tindak Pidana Penadahan pada Masa COVID-19 Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam di Pengadilan Negeri Tanjung Pati (Periode Perkara 2019-2023) Analytical Study of Judges’ Decisions on the Crime of Receiving Stolen Goods during the COVID-19 Period from the Perspective of Islamic Criminal Law at the Tanjung Pati District Court (Case Period 2019–2023)
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
388-404
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i1.9105
Viewed: 103 times
Downloaded: 49 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Zelfani Zazkia Reginal1*, Hendri Hendri2
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The criminal offense of receiving stolen goods constitutes a form of property crime that causes losses to victims and disrupts legal order, and during the Covid-19 pandemic, shifting social dynamics contributed to an increase in such cases within the jurisdiction of the Tanjung Pati District Court. This study aimed to examine judges’ considerations in decisions on cases of receiving stolen goods at the Tanjung Pati District Court during the pandemic and to analyze these considerations from the perspective of Islamic criminal law. A field research design with a qualitative approach was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with judges, document analysis of 21 court decisions on receiving stolen goods, and a review of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and Islamic legal literature, then analyzed through the stages of data reduction, data display, and verification. The findings show that judicial decisions in cases of receiving stolen goods during the Covid-19 pandemic took into account juridical, sociological, philosophical, and subjective aspects as an effort to realize substantive justice under exceptional social conditions. From the perspective of Islamic criminal law, the offense of receiving stolen goods is classified as jarimah hirabah punishable by taʿzir, whereby the determination of sanctions is left to the judge’s ijtihad. Accordingly, the imposition of imprisonment in these decisions is consistent with the values and objectives of Islamic criminal law. This study recommends the need for closer synchronization between positive law and the values of Islamic criminal law in handling cases of receiving stolen goods, particularly in emergency situations such as a pandemic, in order to produce decisions that are more just and oriented toward public welfare.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Ali, M. (2022). Hukum Pidana dan Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Annisa, R. (2017). Peran Hakim dalam Menggali Nilai-Nilai Hukum yang Hidup dalam Masyarakat. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 6(2), 213–228.
Ariyanti, V. (2019). Kebebasan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Pidana. Jurnal Yudisial, 12(1), 45–60.
Arsyady, M. (2022). Sistem Kekerabatan Matrilineal Masyarakat Minangkabau dalam Perspektif Hukum Adat. Jurnal Adat dan Budaya, 4(1), 1–15.
Asmar, A., & Fadli, M. (2019). Kejahatan terhadap Harta Benda dan Faktor Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat. Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 15(2), 98–112.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fadhil, M. (2023). Maqashid al-Syari’ah dan Perlindungan Harta dalam Hukum Pidana Islam. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 21(1), 33–48.
Ilham, R. (2022). Individualisasi Pemidanaan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(3), 345–360.
Indra, A. (2019). Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Penadahan dalam Perspektif KUHAP. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 77–90.
Kalisha, N., Putra, R., & Lestari, D. (2025). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Perkara Pidana Harta Benda di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 13(1), 15–29.
Kamali, M. H. (2019). Shari’ah law: An introduction. Oneworld Academic.
Kurniadi, D. (2022). Unsur Kesengajaan dalam Tindak Pidana Penadahan Menurut KUHP. Jurnal Rechtidee, 17(2), 201–215.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Pinaandri, A. (2021). Dampak Pandemi COVID-19 terhadap Peningkatan Tindak Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 5(2), 89–104.
Reyhand, F. (2021). Keadilan Substantif dalam Putusan Pidana pada Masa Krisis. Jurnal Filsafat Hukum, 4(1), 55–70.
Siregar, M., Harahap, L., & Nasution, R. (2024). Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Indonesia dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP. Jurnal Legislasi Nasional, 21(1), 1–18.
Tarigan, H. (2024). Etika Profesi Hakim dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia. Jurnal Yudikatif, 10(1), 1–16.
Yusriana, Y., & Deliani, S. (2023). Faktor Kriminogen Tindak Pidana Penadahan di Wilayah Perkotaan. Jurnal Kriminologi dan Hukum, 7(2), 144–159.