Relasi Ayat ‘Am dan Khas: Antara Praktik dalam Perkara Thalaq dan Transformasi Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia Relationship Between ‘Ām and Khāṣ Verses: Between Practices in Ṭalāq Matters and the Transformation of Islamic Family Law in Indonesia

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

This study examines the interpretation of ayat ‘am (general) and khas (specific) in the Al-Qur’an related to thalak (divorce) and its relevance for the renewal of Islamic family law in Indonesia. The background of the study lies in the existence of divergent interpretations of divorce verses, which often influence the application of family law in contemporary social and legal contexts. The research aims to analyze the meaning of ayat ‘am and khas on thalak based on tafsir and uṣūl al-fiqh approaches, and to explain their implications for developing a more just and contextually responsive family law in Indonesia. This qualitative library research employs thematic exegesis (tafsīr maudhu‘ī), an uṣūl al-fiqh perspective, and a juridical-normative approach. Primary data are drawn from Al-Qur’an verses on thalak (Q.S. al-Baqarah: 229–230; Q.S. at-Talaq: 1–2), classical tafsir works, and foundational legal literature, while secondary data are obtained from books, journal articles, and regulations on family law in Indonesia. The findings show that ayat ‘am provide general principles of divorce, whereas ayat khas regulate the procedures and ethics of its implementation in more specific terms; an integrative interpretation of both yields a legal construction that balances normative and practical dimensions. Within the context of Indonesian family law, these principles support legal reform aligned with maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, particularly the values of justice (‘adl), public welfare (maṣlaḥah), and the protection of human dignity. Accordingly, the interpretive framework of ayat ‘am and khas on thalak can serve as a conceptual foundation for strengthening Islamic family law in Indonesia so that it becomes more adaptive to contemporary developments while remaining firmly rooted in Al-Qur’anic values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Mukhtar M. (2026)
    Gender, Inheritance, and the Living Qur'an: The Implementation of Justice for Women in Inheritance Distribution in Aceh, Indonesia
    El Usrah, 9(1), 60-83
  2. Hammad A. (2026)
    An enhanced educational competition optimizer and feedforward neural networks for automatic seizure detection in EEG signals
    Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 117
  3. Lasito (2026)
    How You See It and How You Feel It: Indonesian Students' Perception on Translanguaging Practices in EFL Classes
    Sustainable Multilingualism, 28(1), 66-98

Article Details

How to Cite
Alhafis, M., Alfin, M., Siregar, H. S., & Taufiq, M. (2025). Relasi Ayat ‘Am dan Khas: Antara Praktik dalam Perkara Thalaq dan Transformasi Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia. AHKAM, 4(4), 1540-1555. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v4i4.8143

References

Abduh, M., & Ridha, R. (1974). Tafsir al-Manar. Al-Hay’ah al-Misriyyah al-Ammah Lil-Kitab.

Ainiyah, Q., & Muslih, I. (2020). Dilema Hukum Keluarga di Indonesia (Studi Analisis Kasus Perceraian di Indonesia). Jurnal Istiqro: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 6(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.30739/istiqro.v6i1.560

Alghifari, M., Safitri, N., Oktaviana, L., & Kurniati, K. (2024). Memahami Kaidah Ushuliyah: Al-Am, Al-Khas, Al-Amru dan An-Nahyu sebagai Metodologi Penetapan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Ar-Risalah, 4(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.30863/arrisalah.v4i1.5616.g1985

Al-Suyuti, & Al-Din, J. (2008). Al-Itqan fī ‘Ulum al-Qur’an. Dar al-Fikr.

Al-Syatibi, & Ishaq, A. (1997). Al-Muwafaqat fi usul al-fiqh. Dar Ibnu Uthman.

Andaryuni, L. (2017). Putusan Verstek dalam Cerai Gugat karena Pelanggaran Taklik Talak di Pengadilan Agama Samarinda. Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Islam, 16(1), 224–240.

Dahwadin, Syaripudin, E. I., Sofiawati, E., & Somantri, M. D. (2020). Hakikat Perceraian Berdasarkan Ketentuan Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 11(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v11i1.3622

Firdaus, A., Mutawali, & Saprudin. (2024). Kontroversi Antara Fatwa MUI dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan di Indonesia tentang Talak di Luar Pengadilan Ditinjau dari Maqhasid Syariah. Modeling: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 11(2), 230–243. https://www.jurnal.stitnualhikmah.ac.id/index.php/modeling/article/view/2596/1460

Hamzah, Mukhlas, O. S., & Saepullah, U. (2022). Hak-Hak Perempuan Pasca Perceraian dalam Hukum Islam. Jurnal Usroh, 6(1), 62–80.

Ibrahim, & Alwizar. (2025). Analisis Lafaz Kaidah ‘Am dan Takhsis dalam Ushul Fikih. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(2), 1206–1217. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i2.1243

Kasimah Kamaruddin, N. S. A. A., & R. A. R. (2021). Analisis Lafaz ’Am Menurut Imam al-Shafi’i dalam al-Risalah. BITARA International Journal of Civilizational Studies and Human Sciences, 4(1), 53–61. http://bitarajournal.com/index.php/bitarajournal/article/view/178

Kaura, A. M. (2024). An analytical study of the concepts of ʿāmm (generalization) and khāṣ (specification): Their characteristics and implications for Qur’anic exegesis in Nigeria. Middle East Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture, 4(2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.36348/mejisc.2024.v04i02.001

Linda, A. (2012). Analisis Perceraian dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Al-’Adalah, 10(2), 415–422.

Maulana, hafizh I. (2025). Kaidah Ushuliyah (Amm dan Khash, Amr dan Nahyi). Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial, 13(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v13i01.8439

Muchtar, A. H., Maulidizen, A., & Safaah, A. (2022). ’Am and khaṣ linguistic method: Concept and implementation in Islamic law determination. Al-Mashalih: Journal of Islamic Law, 3(1), 1–26. https://journal.stishusnulkhotimah.ac.id/index.php/mashalih/article/view/107

Muhsin, M., & Wahid, S. H. (2021). Talak di Luar Pengadilan Perspektif Fikih dan Hukum Positif. Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies, 3(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v3i1.3063

Nasution, H. (1996). Pembaharuan dalam Islam: Sejarah pemikiran dan gerakan. Bulan Bintang.

Parida, I., Hakim, L. N., & Almunadi. (2023). Etika Perceraian dalam QS. Al-Thalaq dan Implikasinya secara Teologis serta Sosiologis. Al-Shamela: Journal of Quranic and Hadith Studies, 1(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.61994/alshamela.v1i2.179

Sahib, M. A. (2016). Lafaz Ditinjau dari Segi Cakupannya (Am-Khas-Muthlaq-Muqayyad). Jurnal Hukum Diktum, 14(2), 138–147.

Syihab, Q. (2000). Tafsir Al-Mishbah: Pesan, kesan, dan keserasian Al-Quran. Lentera Hati.

Zuhaili, W. (1986). Usul al-fiqh al-Islami. Dār al-Fikr.

Most read articles by the same author(s)