Analisis Yuridis Pendekatan Restoratif Berbasis Kearifan Lokal pada Tindak Pidana Ringan Juridical Analysis of the Restorative Approach Based on Local Wisdom in Minor Crimes

Crossmark

Article Sidebar

Page Numbers: 1119-1130
Download PDF
Published: Aug 30, 2025
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/ahkam.v4i3.7283
Save this to:
Save to Mendeley Download RIS

Article Metrics:
Viewed: 252 times
Downloaded: 143 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (USD 0.00)
Check for article on SINTA:

LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers

Connected Papers:
Connected Papers


Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.


Authors:
Herdy Pratama Susantyo1*, Ahmad Saifuddin2, Ahmad Ferdi Hasan3
Copyright :

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.

Explore Our Journals
Find the journal that best fits your research. If this journal does not match your manuscript’s scope, explore our portfolio below to select a more suitable publication venue.

Main Article Content

Herdy Pratama Susantyo
Universitas Nurul Jadid
Ahmad Saifuddin
Universitas Nurul Jadid
Ahmad Ferdi Hasan
Universitas Nurul Jadid

Abstract

The limited number of studies on the integration of local wisdom into the application of restorative justice for minor criminal offenses forms the background of this research, despite the significant potential of such an approach to strengthen social legitimacy and reduce the burden on the formal criminal justice system. This study aims, through a normative juridical perspective, to: (1) analyze the normative support and legal boundaries within existing positive law instruments; (2) formulate juridical parameters that allow local wisdom to be considered a legitimate element in restorative justice mechanisms; and (3) propose policy recommendations to strengthen the normative framework. The method employed is normative juridical analysis using the statute approach and conceptual approach. Primary legal sources include Prosecutorial Regulation No. 15 of 2020, National Police Regulation No. 8 of 2021, and the new Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023), while secondary and tertiary legal materials were obtained through legal literature and official legal databases. Data were analyzed using content analysis and legal interpretation through grammatical, systematic, and teleological methods. The findings indicate that while Prosecutorial Regulation No. 15 of 2020 has opened space for case dismissal based on restorative justice, it does not explicitly accommodate local wisdom values, potentially creating disharmony with the principle of legality and provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code. Moreover, regulatory inconsistencies at the village law level and ambiguities in classical literature regarding the scope of restorative justice were identified. The main conclusion of this study is the urgent need to draft or revise technical guidelines that explicitly regulate the integration of local wisdom as a valid juridical consideration within restorative justice mechanisms. The implications of this study are both theoretical enriching the literature on legal culture and restorative justice, and practical in enhancing the effectiveness of legally sound and socially accepted resolutions of minor offenses. This research also opens avenues for future studies with empirical and implementation-based approaches across different regions.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Couto M. (2026)
    Exploiting topic analysis models to explore psychological dimensions in social media data
    Scientific Reports, 16(1)
  2. Ricaldi Echevarria M.L. (2026)
    Educational inequalities in academic performance in secondary education in Peru: a multilevel analysis
    Praxis Educativa, 21
  3. López-Rodríguez M.I. (2026)
    Evaluation of patient satisfaction in hospital emergency services and major outpatient surgery
    Journal of Healthcare Quality Research, 41(6)

Article Details

How to Cite
Susantyo, H. P., Saifuddin, A., & Hasan, A. F. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Pendekatan Restoratif Berbasis Kearifan Lokal pada Tindak Pidana Ringan. AHKAM, 4(3), 1119-1130. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v4i3.7283

Creative Commons License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

References

Abdulkarim, Y. A., Yabo, A. G., Dikko, M., Sarkingobir, Y., & Usman, M. (2023). A. Sativum in the prevention of schistosomiasis in Sokoto, Nigeria: Evaluation of phytochemical contents, acute toxicity, and effect on some kidney function parameters in rats. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 1(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v1i2.1542

Behera, D. (2023). Technological interventions in education: An empirical review of their impact on learning outcomes. ALSYSTECH Journal of Education Technology, 1(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.58578/alsystech.v1i1.1674

Dawansa, M. (2021). Penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan keadilan restoratif. Jurnal Hukum Unissula, 37(2), 112–125. https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/jurnalhukum/article/view/26675

Fauzan, A., & Rahman, F. (2022). Restorative justice dalam sistem peradilan pidana: Tinjauan yuridis normatif. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 52(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol52.no3.4521

Ghani, M., & Sulaiman, S. (2023). The effect of dhuha study activities on the spiritual intelligence of students of Padang State University. ALSYSTECH Journal of Education Technology, 1(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.58578/alsystech.v1i1.1722

Nasution, H. (2023). Efektivitas restorative justice dalam mengurangi overcrowding lapas. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 53(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol53.no1.3452

Nasution, M. (2023). Efektivitas penerapan restorative justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana ringan pasca Peraturan Kejaksaan No. 15 Tahun 2020. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum, 4(1), 55–68. https://ejournal.yayasanpendidikandzurriyatulquran.id/index.php/AlZayn/article/view/1010

Nestor, J. (2022). Studi kritis terhadap kedudukan Peraturan Kejaksaan RI Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Jurnal NESTOR Magister Hukum, 9(1), 88–100. https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/nestor/article/view/67470

Tyana, I. N., & Kurnianingsih, M. (2025). The impact of prison overcrowding on the rights and well-being of inmates in Indonesia: A legal perspective. Jurnal Al-Hakim, 7(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.22515/jurnalalhakim.v7i1.11363

Wakkary, R. S. (2021). Implementasi prinsip restorative justice dalam sistem penuntutan berdasarkan Peraturan Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020. Lex Crimen, 10(9), 45–55. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/36558

Wakkary, S. (2021). Kearifan lokal dalam penyelesaian perkara pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 10(2), 201–218. https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id

Karwati, E. (2020). Kinerja dan profesionalisme kepala sekolah membangun sekolah yang bermutu. Alfabeta.

Mulyadi, D. (2019). Restorative justice: Konsep dan implementasi dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.

Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2020 Nomor 889. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/149720/perja-no-15-tahun-2020

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2023). Putusan Nomor 45/Pid.B/2023/PN.MKS. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id

Polri. (2021a). Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Penanganan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2021 Nomor 850.

Polri. (2021b). Peraturan Kepolisian Nomor 8 Tahun 2021. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/225020/perpol-no-8-tahun-2021

Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 32.

Thioso, H. (2021). Peraturan Kejaksaan 15/2020: Kriteria penghentian penuntutan karena restorative justice. LinkedIn. https://id.linkedin.com/pulse/peraturan-kejaksaan-152020-kriteria-penghentian-karena-hans-thioso

Hukumonline. (2022, Januari 17). Melihat penerapan keadilan restoratif di Kejaksaan. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/melihat-penerapan-keadilan-restoratif-di-kejaksaan-lt61e527ca2703a