Perbedaan Adversity Quotient Siswa Ditinjau dari Jenis Kelamin Differences in Students' Adversity Quotient Based on Gender
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
86-94
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v4i1.4836
Viewed: 190 times
Downloaded: 160 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Rahma Winda1, Indah Sukmawati2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research is motivated by the phenomenon of students who easily despair when facing subjects that are considered difficult and do not have the fighting power to try to complete the lesson and are pessimistic about their abilities, this is a characteristic of an individual who has a weak adversity quotient. This study aims to describe the adversity quotient of students and examine the differences in adversity quotient of male and female students. The research method used is quantitative method with comparative research type. The population in this study were students at SMPN 10 Padang, totaling 847 students. The sample in this study was 272 students selected using stratified random sampling technique. Data collection techniques using adversity quotient scale which then processed using descriptive statistical techniques and independent sample t-test techniques. The results showed that students' adversity quotient was generally in the high category (48.2%). In terms of differences in the adversity quotient of men and women, a significant value of 0.223> 0.05 is obtained, which means that there is no significant difference, which means Ho is accepted. Based on the results, it is concluded that guidance and counseling teachers can provide assistance to improve adversity quotient in the form of providing information services, group counseling services and group guidance services without considering gender differences.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Amory, J. D. S. (2019). Peranan Gender Perempuan Dalam Pembangunan Di Sulawesi Barat Tahun 2016-2018. Jurnal ilmiah ekonomi pembangunan, 1(1), 1-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.24042/jwcs.v2i2.14317
Fahira, A., & Zulfiana, U. (2022). Kontribusi adversity quotient terhadap student engagement pada pembelajaran blended learning di SMAN x Singosari. Cognicia, 10 (1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.22219/cognicia.v10i1.20078
Farida, L. (2018). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran argument driven inguiry (ADI) terhadap keterampilan argumentasi siswa SMP berdasarkan perbedaan jenis kelamin. Journal of Physics and Science Learning, 2(3), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.30743/pascal.v2i2.978
Fitri, E.,Ifdil., Neviyarni. 2016. Efektivitas layanan informasi dengan menggunakan metode blended learning untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.26858/jpkk.v2i2.2250
Leman. (2007). Memahami Adversity Quotient. (Indonesian Psychological Journal), 1, 67-74
M.Menge., R.L & Arifyanto, A.T (2024). Pengaruh layanan konseling kelompok terhadap adversity quotient siswa. Jurnal Attending, 3(2), 185-196
Mulyadi, A. R., & Sano, A. (2017). Kesiapan Siswa dalam Mengikuti Ujian dan Implikasinya dalam Layanan Bimbingan dan Konseling (Studi Deskriptif di SMP N 16 Padang). Procceding International Counseling and Education Seminar.
Nurhayati, & Fajrianti, N. (2015). Pengaruh Adversity Quotient (AQ) dan Motivasi Berprestasi terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Formatif, 3(1), 72–77. https://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v3i1.110
Nur, A. S., & Palabo, M. (2018). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gaya Kognitif dan Gender. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif Inovatif, 9(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v9i2.15067
Nurfarhanah. (2012). Implikasi teori perkembangan kognitif dalam kegiatan belajar. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan 12(2), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.24036/pedagogi.v12i2.2209
Nurihsan, A. J. (2006). Bimbingan dan konseling dalam berbagai latar kehidupan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Parantika, I. W. A. (2020). Differences in Academic Procrastination Attitude Between Fifth Grade Male and Female Students. Journal of Psychology and Instruction, 4(1), 10– 15. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpai.v4i1.24451
Pusparani, W.P., & Jannah, M. (2022). Perbedaan Adversity Quotient Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin Pada Anggota Himpunan Pecinta Alam Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi 9(3),43-54).
Santrock, J. W. (2009). Remaja. (alih bahasa: Benedictine Widyasinta). Jakarta: Erlangga
Stoltz, Paul. G. (2000). Adversity Quotient: Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. (T. Hermaya, Terjemah). Jakarta: Grasindo.
Syukur, Y., Neviyarni, S., Zahri, T. N. (2019). Bimbingan dan Konseling di sekolah. Malang: IRDH.
Wulandari, T., Syukur, Y., Netrawati, N., & Hariko, R. (2022). Efektivitas Konseling Kelompok dengan Pendekatan Cognitive Behavior Therapy untuk Meningkatkan Kedisiplinan Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 7(2), 376–380. https://dx.doi.org/10.29210/022282jpgi0005