Analisis Faktor-faktor Penyebab Teknostres pada Karyawan Fresh Graduate Strata 1 Analysis of Factors Causing Technostress Among Fresh Graduate Employees with a Bachelor's Degree
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
790-802
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v3i4.4247
Viewed: 235 times
Downloaded: 242 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Marthiyo Triwana1, Yohanes Budiarto2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The industrial revolution 4.0 has driven digital transformation in various sectors, changing the way companies operate and employees work. However, behind the advancements and efficiencies offered by technology comes a new phenomenon that deserves serious attention: technostress. Technostress, a term first introduced by Craig Brod in 1984, refers to the inability of individuals to adapt to or cope with new technologies in a healthy manner. This phenomenon is increasingly relevant in the context of the modern workplace, where employees are required to continuously adopt and adapt to new technologies. In this ever-changing work landscape, fresh graduate employees are an interesting group to study. They enter the workforce with assumed digital skills, but in reality, they are also vulnerable to technostress. Although this generation is often referred to as “digital natives”, they face unique challenges in dealing with the technological demands of the professional workplace. The participants in this study had the following criteria: male and female, 20-40 years old, recent graduates from a university, and have been working for at least one year or more. There were 72 participants collected in this study. Data collection for this study was carried out from September 2024 to mid-October 2024. The sampling technique used by researchers is purposive sampling. This type of research is qualitative which is analyzed using MAXQDA Analytics Pro 24 v24.4.1. This study aims to analyze the factors that cause the occurrence of technostress in employees of new undergraduate graduates. From the results of the research analysis, it can be said that the causes of technostress are quite complex, resulting in varied answers. However, the dominant answer said that technostress occurs due to unwise or excessive use of electronic devices that have a negative physical and emotional effect on users.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Bondanini, G., Giorgi, G., Ariza-Montes, A., Vega-Muñoz, A., & Andreucci- Annunziata, P. (2020). Technostress dark side of technology in the workplace: a scientometric analysis. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (Vol. 17, Issue 21, pp. 1–25). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218013
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2020). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1–14. doi:10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
Chen, L., & Muthitacharoen, A. (2016). An empirical investigation of the consequences of technostress: Evidence from China. Information Resources Management Journal, 29(2), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.2016040102
Estrada-Araoz, E. G., Quispe-Aquise, J., Huamani-Mallgui, A. Y., Salas-Tincusi, E., MamaniCalcina, B., & Jara-Rodríguez, F. (2023). Exploring The Relationship Between Technostress and Psychological Well-Being Education Teachers: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.55908/SDGS.V11I2.442
Gaudioso, F., Turel, O., & Galimberti, C. (2017). The mediating roles of strain facets and coping strategies in translating techno-stressors into adverse job outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.041
Hauk, N., Göritz, A. S., & Krumm, S. (2019). The mediating role of coping behavior on the age-technostress relationship: A longitudinal multilevel mediation model. PLoS ONE, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213349
Hershatter, A., & Epstein, M. (2010). Millennials and the world of work: An organization and management perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9160-y
La Torre, G., Esposito, A., Sciarra, I., & Chiappetta, M. (2019). Definition, symptoms and risk of techno-stress: a systematic review. In International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health (Vol. 92, Issue 1, pp. 13–35). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1352-1
Li, L., & Wang, X. (2021). Technostress Inhibitors and Creators and Their Impacts on University Teachers’ Work Performan in Higher Education. Cognition, Technology & Work, 23(2), 315-330.
Molino, M., Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Manuti, A., Giancaspro, M. L., Russo, V., Zito, M., & Cortese, C. G. (2020). Wellbeing costs of technology use during Covid-19 remote working: An investigation using the Italian translation of the technostress creators scale. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12155911
Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual