Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Oral literature learning through pantun exchanges provides a participatory space that enables students to develop verbal interaction, collaboration, and performative expression, but the characteristics of student participation in this learning process still need to be examined more systematically. This study aims to describe and analyze students’ dialogic, collaborative, and performative forms of participation in oral literature learning through pantun exchanges at SMA Negeri 2 Solok Selatan. The study employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive design, involving one Indonesian language teacher and 57 Grade XI students over eight learning sessions. Data were collected through participant observation, in-depth interviews, documentation, and audio and video recordings and were subsequently analyzed through data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. The results revealed three main forms of student participation. Dialogic participation was reflected in responses, questions, clarifications, and speaking initiatives, with student talk accounting for 58% of the total. Collaborative participation was manifested through the exchange of ideas, joint composition of pantun, peer assistance, and role distribution, while performative participation was evident in the use of intonation, rhythm, expression, gestures, eye contact, and responses to the audience. These three forms of participation were interconnected in the processes of understanding, composing, and performing pantun. These findings confirm that student participation in oral literature learning is multidimensional, encompassing dialogic, collaborative, and performative dimensions. The implications of this study indicate the importance of pantun-exchange learning that integrates opportunities for interaction, collaboration, and performance to strengthen student engagement in oral literature learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Trisnowati E. (2027)
    Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and Research Skill Development (RSD) in Science Education in Higher Education: A Delphi-Based Model
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 253-268
  2. Unyaphatariyakool S. (2027)
    Science Teachers’ Learning Management Competency through Professional Learning Communities to Promote Scientific Creativity and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 241-252
  3. Naemi Z. (2027)
    The Relationship between Second Language Learning Strategies, Learning Engagement, and Writing Skill in the Arabic Writing Curriculum
    Language Related Research, 17(4), 331-360

Article Details

How to Cite
Agusti, & Abdurahman. (2026). Partisipasi Dialogis, Kolaboratif, dan Performatif Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Sastra Lisan Berbalas Pantun. AHKAM, 5(4), 4664-4682. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i4.12138

References

Alexander, R. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351040143

Bagastian, Y., Usman, H., & Adi, T. T. (2023). Pantun as local cultural literation media for elementary school students in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 6(2), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i2.57687

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Pearson.

Böheim, R., Urdan, T., Knogler, M., & Seidel, T. (2020). Student hand-raising as an indicator of behavioral engagement and its role in classroom learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, Article 101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101894

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://edge.sagepub.com/creswellrd5e

Decristan, J., Jansen, N. C., & Fauth, B. (2023). Student participation in whole-class discourse: Individual conditions and consequences for student learning in primary and secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 86, Article 101748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101748

Díez-Palomar, J., Chan, M. C. E., Clarke, D., & Padrós, M. (2021). How does dialogical talk promote student learning during small group work? An exploratory study. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30, Article 100540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100540

Eiene, S. M. Ø., & Brevik, L. M. (2026). A dialogic whole: Creating space for student talk in digitally-rich language classrooms in England, France and Norway. Teaching and Teacher Education, 172, Article 105334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105334

García-Carrión, R., López de Aguileta, G., Padrós, M., & Ramis-Salas, M. (2020). Implications for social impact of dialogic teaching and learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00140

Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact on student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 462–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730

Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2025). Capaian Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Fase F. https://guru.kemendikdasmen.go.id/kurikulum/referensi-penerapan/capaian-pembelajaran/sd-sma/bahasa-indonesia/fase-f/

Palma Salinas, I. (2024). Egalitarian dialogue and student participation in learning communities: The case of the Coquimbo Region, Chile. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 49, Article 100867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100867

Pratama, R. H., & Yandra, A. (2025). Teaching local wisdom through oral literature: Insights from teachers’ beliefs and practices on Minangkabau petatah-petitih. Jurnal Tahuri, 22(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.30598/tahurivol22issue1page34-51

Rapanta, C., Miralda-Banda, A., Garcia-Milà, M., Vrikki, M., Macagno, F., & Evagorou, M. (2023). Detecting the factors affecting classroom dialogue quality. Linguistics and Education, 77, Article 101223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2023.101223

Ruiz-Eugenio, L., Soler-Gallart, M., Racionero-Plaza, S., & Padrós, M. (2023). Dialogic literary gatherings: A systematic review of evidence to overcome social and educational inequalities. Educational Research Review, 39, Article 100534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100534

Santosa, D. H., Siswantari, H., & Mukarromah, N. (2021). Transforming folklore into stage performance: The role of oral literature as local resources for traditional performing arts in Indonesia. International Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 3(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.31763/viperarts.v3i2.439

Schechner, R. (2020). Performance studies: An introduction (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315269399

UNESCO. (2020). Pantun. https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/pantun-02274

van der Wilt, F., Bouwer, R., & van der Veen, C. (2022). Dialogic classroom talk in early childhood education: The effect on language skills and social competence. Learning and Instruction, 77, Article 101522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101522