Disparitas Sanksi dalam Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Nomor 25-PKE-DKPP/I/2025 terhadap Anggota Komisi Pemilihan Umum Kota Banjarbaru Sanction Disparity in the Decision of the Election Organizer Ethics Council Number 25-PKE-DKPP/I/2025 against Members of the Banjarbaru City General Elections Commission
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
2656-2675
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10604
Viewed: 0 times
Downloaded: 0 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Renaldy Farhan1*, Deden Koswara2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although the enforcement of the code of ethics for election organizers by the Election Organizer Honorary Council (DKPP) has received attention in various previous studies, studies that specifically examine disparities in sanctions within a single decision against subjects involved in the same legal event remain limited. This study aims to analyze the ratio decidendi of the DKPP in imposing disparities in sanctions on members of the Banjarbaru City General Election Commission (KPU) in Decision No. 25-PKE-DKPP/I/2025 and to assess its conformity with the principle of proportionality in law. This study uses a normative legal method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Data were collected through a literature study of laws and regulations, DKPP decisions, legal literature, and previous research findings, and were then analyzed descriptively and analytically. The results show that the DKPP differentiated sanctions based on the corrective attitude demonstrated by one of the respondents. However, this consideration was not accompanied by clear parameters regarding the weighting of the degree of fault, role, and form of responsibility of each respondent. As a result, the disparity in sanctions imposed still leaves issues in terms of proportionality, legal certainty, and consistency in enforcing the code of ethics. This finding contributes to the development of studies on election law and ethical adjudication, particularly regarding the application of the principle of proportionality in the imposition of sanctions. The implications of this study can serve as evaluation material for the DKPP in formulating legal considerations that are more transparent, measurable, and accountable, while also opening space for further research on the consistency of disparities in sanctions across various DKPP decisions.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Alexy, R. (2010). A theory of constitutional rights. Oxford University Press.
Alfahrezi, M., Syamsir, & Agus. (2026). Hilangnya Finalisasi Etik: Kajian Kristis terhadap Eksistensi DKPP Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 32/PUU-XIX/2021. Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law, 6(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.22437/limbago.v6i1.50296
Anggraini, T. (2022). Hukum Kepemiluan dan Etika Penyelenggara Pemilu di Indonesia. Konstitusi Press.
Arifatuzzahrah, F., & Hasba, I. B. (2024). Kepastian Hukum Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu terhadap Pelanggaran Kode Etik Penyelenggara Pemilu. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i1.7997
Asshiddiqie, J. (2005). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2022). Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi: Perspektif Baru tentang Rule of Law and Rule of Ethics & Constitutional Law and Constitutional Ethics (Edisi revisi). Sinar Grafika.
Barak, A. (2012). Proportionality: Constitutional rights and their limitations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035293
Bria, H., Sihotang, E., & Herawati, K. M. (2024). Kewenangan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) dalam Penegakan Etika Penyelenggara Pemilu. Nusantara Hasana Journal, 4(4), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.59003/nhj.v4i4.1232
Chakim, M. L. (2014). Desain Institusional Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) sebagai Peradilan Etik. Jurnal Konstitusi, 11(2), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk11210
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.
Hayckel, E., Paskarina, C., & Solihah, R. (2024). Peran Prinsip-Prinsip Fundamental Penyelenggaraan Pemilu dalam Meningkatkan Integritas Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum. JANE (Jurnal Administrasi Negara), 16(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.24198/jane.v16i1.51666
HR, R. (2016). Hukum Administrasi Negara. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Husain, M. S. (2026). Kajian Yuridis Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) terhadap Pelanggaran Kode Etik Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU). Lex Crimen, 14(4). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/66440
Juniati, A. (2026). Implementasi Asas Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Sistem Pemilihan Umum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(3), 5978–5990. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i3.6267
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.
Mertokusumo, S. (2007). Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Liberty.
Mertokusumo, S. (2021). Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar. Mahakarya Pustaka.
Muarif, A. (2024). Implementasi Prinsip Negara Hukum dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(7), 100–107. https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/8969
Peraturan DKPP Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Penyelenggara Pemilu. (2017). https://dkpp.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/peraturandkppnomor2tentangkodeetik.pdf
Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Nomor 25-PKE-DKPP/I/2025. (2025). https://dkpp.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Salinan-Putusan-Perkara-Nomor-25-Tahun-2025-Teradu-KPU-Kota-Banjarbaru.pdf
Redhani, M. E., & Harliansyah, H. (2023). Analisis Ketidaktepatan Penerapan Norma oleh DKPP dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan (Studi Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Nomor 178-PKE-DKPP/XI/2020). Konferensi Nasional Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara, 1(1), 317–346. https://doi.org/10.55292/r7eyx891
Rizal, K., & Sudarno. (2026). Pengaruh Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu dalam Keberlangsungan Pelaksanaan Pemilu yang Jujur dan Adil. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v6i1.3200
Rugian, I. A. (2021). Prinsip Proporsionalitas dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi Perbandingan di Indonesia dan Jerman). Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(2), 461–479. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1829
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Rajawali Pers.
Surbakti, R., & Asy’ari, H. (2011). Menjaga Kemandirian Penyelenggara Pemilu. Kemitraan.
Tiffany, D., Tingginehe, N. E., Putrayasa, E. H. W., Stefani, G. C., & Debora, C. (2026). Makna Kepastian Hukum dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum dan Implementasinya di Indonesia. Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian, 3(1, Spesial Issue), 5228–5237. https://doi.org/10.62710/2wkrxg23
Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. (2017). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/details/37644/uu-no-7-tahun-2017