الجريمة الإلكترونية في وسائل الإعلام: التحديات المجتمعية، من المقاربات النظرية في مجال التواصل إلى البناء الخطابي The Mediatization of Cybercrime: Communication Theories and Societal Discursive Challenges
Main Article Content
Abstract
As cybercrime increasingly shapes contemporary digital life, media coverage plays a central role in constructing public understanding of digital threats and insecurity. This paper examines the media coverage and analytical treatment of cybercrime through key theoretical perspectives in media and communication studies, with particular attention to the discursive and narrative strategies used by media institutions to frame cybercrime. Drawing on technological determinism, agenda-setting theory, media effects theory, and new media theory, the study analyzes how media representations of cybercrime oscillate between dramatization, trivialization, and security-oriented framing. The analysis shows that cybercrime is not presented merely as a technical or criminal issue, but as a socially constructed and mediated phenomenon that shapes public perception, influences policy formation, and affects institutional legitimacy. The paper further argues that media institutions play a decisive role in producing collective imaginaries of digital insecurity and in structuring social responses to cyber threats. It concludes that media coverage of cybercrime extends beyond information transmission to become a symbolic process that organizes social representations and influences individual practices. This study contributes to media and communication scholarship by clarifying how theoretical perspectives can explain the role of media in framing cybercrime and its broader social implications.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Wall, D. S. (2007). Cybercrime: The transformation of crime in the information age. Polity Press.
Neveu, É. (2015). Sociologie politique des problèmes publics. Armand Colin. https://doi.org/10.3917/arco.neve.2015.01
Surette, R. (2015). Media, crime, and criminal justice: Images, realities, and policies (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Charaudeau, P. (2005). Les médias et l'information: L'impossible transparence du discours. De Boeck & INA.
Gusfield, J. R. (1981). The culture of public problems: Drinking-driving and the symbolic order. University of Chicago Press.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society: A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0181
Esquenazi, J.-P. (2007). Sociologie des œuvres: De la production à l'interprétation. Armand Colin.
Charaudeau, P. (2005). Les médias et l'information: L'impossible transparence du discours. De Boeck & INA.
Surette, R. (2015). Media, crime, and criminal justice: Images, realities, and policies (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., & Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. SAGE Publications.
Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. Routledge.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The spectatorship of suffering. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220658
Wall, D. S. (2008). Cybercrime, media and insecurity: The shaping of public perceptions of cybercrime. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 22(1–2), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860801924907
Mosco, V. (2009). The political economy of communication (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
McGuire, M., & Dowling, S. (2013). Cyber crime: A review of the evidence (Research Report 75). Home Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cyber-crime-a-review-of-the-evidence
Jeanneret, Y. (2014). Critique de la trivialité: Les médiations de la communication, enjeu de pouvoir. Éditions Non Standard.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.
Jordan, T., & Taylor, P. A. (1998). A sociology of hackers. The Sociological Review, 46(4), 757–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00139
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Musiani, F. (2015). Practice, plurality, performativity, and plumbing: Internet governance research meets science and technology studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(2), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914553803
Dunn Cavelty, M. (2008). Cyber-security and threat politics: US efforts to secure the information age. Routledge.
Singer, P. W., & Friedman, A. (2014). Cybersecurity and cyberwar: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.
Rid, T. (2013). Cyber war will not take place. Oxford University Press.
Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford University Press.
Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity Press.




















