L'accent cleaning par l'intelligence artificielle: Enjeux éthiques, responsabilité épistémique et reproduction des hiérarchies linguistiques dans les technologies vocales AI-Based Accent Cleaning: Ethical Issues, Epistemic Responsibility, and the Reproduction of Linguistic Hierarchies in Voice Technologies

Main Article Content


Abstract

The widespread deployment of artificial intelligence–based speech technologies is profoundly reshaping contemporary language practices. These systems, trained predominantly on corpora drawn from standardized or geopolitically dominant varieties, tend to normalize phonetic features that diverge from the reference norm, a phenomenon known as accent cleaning. This contribution examines this process through two questions: to what extent do automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems contribute to the reproduction of linguistic and social hierarchies, and what responsibility do researchers in the language sciences bear in relation to these biases? The central hypothesis is that these models privilege certain phonetic norms at the expense of diversity, producing forms of symbolic exclusion for speakers with marginalized accents. An exploratory comparative analysis examines three ASR systems (Google Speech-to-Text, OpenAI Whisper, and Amazon Transcribe) using a speech corpus from speakers of three contrasting varieties of French (standard French, Moroccan French, and sub-Saharan French). The anticipated results suggest significant asymmetries in word error rates (WER) and mechanisms of active normalization. The study aims to document these biases empirically and examine the researcher’s role from a digital ethics perspective.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 11634.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Aguirre-Suárez T. (2027)
    A bibliometric and systematic analysis of artificial intelligence and the transition towards smart geotourism
    Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 13(1), 523-552
  2. Kamaraj M. (2027)
    Artificial intelligence-driven approaches for detection, fate, transport, and remediation of microplastic pollution in aquatic systems
    Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 13(1), 479-500
  3. Wang J. (2027)
    Analysis and Applications of Neuromorphic Memristors in Artificial Intelligence Computing
    Nano Micro Letters, 19(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Bensaid, N. (2026). L'accent cleaning par l'intelligence artificielle: Enjeux éthiques, responsabilité épistémique et reproduction des hiérarchies linguistiques dans les technologies vocales. International Journal of Education, Culture, and Society, 4(3), 760-775. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijecs.v4i3.11634

References

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’21) (pp. 610–623). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Bourdieu, P. (1982). Ce que parler veut dire: L’économie des échanges linguistiques. Fayard. https://www.fayard.fr/livre/ce-que-parler-veut-dire-9782213012162/

Calvet, L.-J. (2024). Linguistique et colonialisme: Petit traité de glottophagie (5e éd.). Lambert-Lucas. (Ouvrage original publié en 1974). https://www.lambert-lucas.com/livre/linguistique-et-colonialisme/

Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés. (2017). Comment permettre à l’homme de garder la main? Rapport sur les enjeux éthiques des algorithmes et de l’intelligence artificielle. https://www.cnil.fr/fr/comment-permettre-lhomme-de-garder-la-main-rapport-sur-les-enjeux-ethiques-des-algorithmes-et-de

Dent, R. J. (2022). Modeling regional accents of French for inclusive speech recognition [Master’s dissertation, University of Malta]. OAR@UM. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/137280

Graham, C., & Roll, N. (2024). Evaluating OpenAI’s Whisper ASR: Performance analysis across diverse accents and speaker traits. JASA Express Letters, 4(2), Article 025206. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0024876

Koenecke, A., Nam, A., Lake, E., Nudell, J., Quartey, M., Mengesha, Z., Toups, C., Rickford, J. R., Jurafsky, D., & Goel, S. (2020). Racial disparities in automated speech recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(14), 7684–7689. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915768117

Koźmińska, K. (2025). Reimagining accents and speech recognition with sociolinguistic perception studies and research on listening subjects. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 29(5), 360–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12720

Maison, L., & Estève, Y. (2023). Some voices are too common: Building fair speech recognition systems using the Common Voice dataset [Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03773

Milroy, J. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4), 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00163

Villani, C. (2018). Donner un sens à l’intelligence artificielle: Pour une stratégie nationale et européenne (Rapport au Premier ministre). https://www.vie-publique.fr/files/rapport/pdf/184000159.pdf