Analisis Yuridis Implementasi Pasal 54 UU Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 dalam Mengatasi Overkapasitas Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Juridical Analysis of the Implementation of Article 54 of Law Number 35 of 2009 in Addressing Overcrowding in Correctional Institutions
Main Article Content
Abstract
The implementation of Article 54 of Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics remains suboptimal because imprisonment continues to dominate the handling of persons who abuse narcotics and contributes to worsening prison overcrowding in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the regulation of rehabilitation for narcotics addicts and victims of narcotics abuse, examine its implementation in criminal justice practice, and assess the effectiveness of rehabilitation as a solution to prison overcrowding. The study employed a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were collected through a literature review and subsequently analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis with deductive reasoning. The findings indicate that Article 54 of Law Number 35 of 2009 normatively mandates medical and social rehabilitation for narcotics addicts and victims of narcotics abuse as a health- and recovery-oriented approach. However, its implementation remains constrained by the dominance of repressive approaches in law enforcement, limited rehabilitation facilities, the suboptimal functioning of the Tim Asesmen Terpadu, and disparities in judicial decisions. These obstacles result in many persons who abuse narcotics continuing to receive prison sentences, thereby contributing to increased prison overcrowding. Based on the theories of legal effectiveness and modern sentencing, the consistent implementation of rehabilitation can reduce the number of narcotics-related prisoners while shifting the orientation of treatment from punishment to recovery. This study affirms that optimizing Article 54 through strengthened integrated assessments, the equitable distribution of rehabilitation facilities, and consistency among law enforcement officials constitutes a strategic measure for establishing a more humane, effective, and equitable criminal justice system.

Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Couto M. (2026)Exploiting topic analysis models to explore psychological dimensions in social media dataScientific Reports, 16(1)
-
Ricaldi Echevarria M.L. (2026)Educational inequalities in academic performance in secondary education in Peru: a multilevel analysisPraxis Educativa, 21
-
López-Rodríguez M.I. (2026)Evaluation of patient satisfaction in hospital emergency services and major outpatient surgeryJournal of Healthcare Quality Research, 41(6)
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Dewi, E., Arilia, Y., & Firmanto, A. A. (2021). Upaya Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pengguna Narkotika dengan Sistem Rehabilitasi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 di Badan Narkotika Nasional Provinsi Lampung. Jurnal Hukum Malahayati, 2(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.33024/jhm.v2i1.4130
Fauziah, E., Fatrika, S., & Pratiwi, U. D. (2022). Keselarasan Lembaga Penegak Hukum dalam Implementasi Restorative Justice bagi Penyalahguna Narkotika di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Stratejik Ketahanan Nasional, 5(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.7454/jkskn.v5i1.10061
Firdhaus, R. C. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Pentingnya Penerapan Rehabilitasi bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika [Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo]. https://eprints.umpo.ac.id/12805/
Halimatusakdiah, Fathonah, R., Husin, B. R., & Farid, M. (2026). Rehabilitasi terhadap Penyalahguna Narkotika sebagai Upaya dalam Mengatasi Overkapasitas Lapas di Indonesia. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(2), 2036–2045. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i2.4575
Hantoro, N. M., & Septiningtyas, R. S. (2024). Upaya Penanganan Overkapasitas pada Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Info Singkat: Kajian Singkat terhadap Isu Aktual dan Strategis, 16(21), 6–10. https://berkas.dpr.go.id/pusaka/files/info_singkat/Info%20Singkat-XVI-21-I-P3DI-November-2024-187.pdf
Hidayat, A. F., Andriyansa, S., Suarda, I. G. W., & Ohoiwutun, Y. A. T. (2025). Dekriminalisasi dan Rehabilitasi dalam KUHP Baru sebagai Solusi untuk Mengatasi Overkapasitas Lapas di Indonesia. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 6(4), 1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i04.1731
Parindo, D. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Pengadilan tentang Rehabilitasi Penyalahguna Narkotika dalam Perspektif Keadilan Restoratif. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.58344/jhi.v4i4.1773
Prastiyo, W. E. (2022). Rekonstruksi Hukum Rehabilitasi bagi Pecandu dan Korban Penyalahguna Narkotika. PT Refika Aditama.
Rahmania, N., & Nirmala, A. Z. (2023). Relevansi antara Rehabilitasi Penyalahguna Narkotika dengan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan di Indonesia yang Mengalami Kelebihan Kapasitas. Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, 4(1), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v4i1.119
Sitompul, C. N., Ekaputra, M., Trisna, W., & Zaidar. (2024). Penerapan Rehabilitasi terhadap Penyalahguna Narkotika dalam Upaya Mengurangi Over Kapasitas di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas I Medan. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 13(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.47709/jhb.v13i02.3690
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Triana, I. D. S., & Erowati, E. M. (2022). Restorative Justice sebagai Solusi Mengatasi Overkapasitas Lapas di Indonesia. Jurnal Locus Delicti, 3(2), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.23887/jld.v3i2.1613
Yanti, R. A., Krisna, L. A., & Hayati, V. (2025). Kritik atas Penerapan UU Narkotika dan Kaitannya dengan Overcrowded di Lapas Indonesia: Evaluasi Normatif-Empiris terhadap Penegakan UU Narkotika di Indonesia. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 4(7), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v4i7.590


















