A Comparative Analysis of Microbial Load and Diversity in Fresh and Smoked Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) from Selected Markets in Delta State, Nigeria

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

This study evaluated the microbiological quality and safety of fresh and smoked catfish (Clarias gariepinus) obtained from five markets (Amai, Umutu, Abbey, Obiaruku, Kwale) in Delta State, Nigeria, during both rainy and dry seasons. A total of 50 samples were analyzed for total aerobic plate count, coliform count, and specific microbial isolates using standard microbiological and biochemical methods, and the results were benchmarked against Standards Organization of Nigeria (SON) guidelines. The findings showed that the microbial quality of fresh fish was variable, with gill samples from Amai and Obiaruku in the rainy season exhibiting marginal levels of contamination (10³ CFU/g), whereas all smoked fish samples, irrespective of market or season, had satisfactory and significantly lower microbial loads (10¹–10² CFU/g), confirming the effectiveness of smoking as a preservation technique. Bacteriological analysis of fresh fish identified potential pathogens, including Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella sp., and Klebsiella sp., while mycological assessment revealed the presence of Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger, Mucor, and Fusarium species. The study concludes that, although smoking markedly improves the microbiological safety of catfish, the initially high contamination levels in fresh fish, especially the occurrence of pathogenic bacteria and potentially mycotoxigenic fungi—pose a significant public health risk and indicate critical points of post-harvest contamination within the supply chain that require targeted control measures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Shiryazdi R.S. (2027)
    Assessing performances of pattern informatics method variants: a comparative analysis in Zagros, Iran
    Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 20(3), 65-80
  2. Toshov J.B. (2027)
    Comparative Analysis of Mathematical Models of Drilling in Heterogeneous Geological Sections
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 60-70
  3. Makwana V.M. (2027)
    AQUATIC INSECT DIVERSITY AND ASSOCIATED AVIAN FEEDING GUILDS: A BASELINE STUDY FROM SEMI-ARID WETLANDS OF GUJARAT, WESTERN INDIA
    Indian Journal of Entomology, 89(1), 223-230

Article Details

How to Cite
Uche, O. E., C.S.O, O., B.O, B., & D.S, E. (2026). A Comparative Analysis of Microbial Load and Diversity in Fresh and Smoked Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) from Selected Markets in Delta State, Nigeria. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i1.8092

References

Adebolu, T. T., Vhriterhire, K. A., & Etcher, N. O. (2015). Microbiological quality of smoked and fresh fish sold in Akure, Nigeria. Journal of Food Safety, 35(2), 221–226.

Akinola, O. A., Akinyemi, A. A., & Bolaji, B. O. (2016). Evaluation of traditional fish smoking methods in Nigeria. African Journal of Food Science, 10(8), 124–131.

Asante, K. A., Quarcoo, G., & Biney, C. A. (2020). Heavy metal contamination in smoked fish from selected markets in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. Journal of Food Protection, 83(5), 893–900.

Cheesbrough, M. (2006). District laboratory practice in tropical countries: Part 2 (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Clarkson, T. W., & Magos, L. (2006). The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 36(8), 609–662.

Ezekiel, C. N., Ayeni, K. I., Akinyemi, M. O., Sulyok, M., Oyedele, O. A., Babalola, D. A., & Krska, R. (2019). Fungal and bacterial metabolites in commercial poultry feed from Nigeria. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 36(5), 757–768.

Fiedler, H., Cheung, C. K., & Wong, M. H. (2019). PCDD/PCDF, chlorinated pesticides and PAH in Chinese teas. Chemosphere, 227, 93–101.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (1983). Compilation of legal limits for hazardous substances in fish and fishery products (FAO Fishery Circular No. 464).

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2020). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in action. https://www.fao.org/3/ca9229en/ca9229en.pdf

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2022). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2022: Towards blue transformation. https://www.fao.org/3/cc0461en/cc0461en.pdf

Godt, J., Scheidig, F., Grosse-Siestrup, C., Esche, V., Brandenburg, P., Reich, A., & Groneberg, D. A. (2006). The toxicity of cadmium and resulting hazards for human health. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 1, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-1-22

Gyimah, E., Agyare, C., & Ofori, E. (2020). Seasonal variations in microbial contamination of fish from coastal waters of Ghana. Journal of Food Quality and Hazards Control, 7(4), 191–198.

Huss, H. H. (2018). Assurance of seafood quality (FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 334). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Jaishankar, M., Tseten, T., Anbalagan, N., Mathew, B. B., & Beeregowda, K. N. (2014). Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdisciplinary Toxicology, 7(2), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.2478/intox-2014-0009

Samson, R. A., Houbraken, J., Thrane, U., Frisvad, J. C., & Andersen, B. (2019). Food and indoor fungi. Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute.

Sikorski, Z. E., & Kolakowski, E. (2010). Smoking. In Handbook of seafood and seafood products analysis (pp. 413–426). CRC Press.

Sofolahan, O. A., Basiru, A. O., & Oranusi, S. U. (2017). Microbial safety and quality of smoked fish marketed in Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Food Safety & Hygiene, 3(1–2), 19–23.


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.