Emotional Engagement with VAK-Informed Multimodal EFL Materials among Indonesian Senior High School Learners

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Students’ emotional engagement remains a persistent challenge in many English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms, where instruction is frequently dominated by teacher-centered approaches and textbook-based materials. This study aimed to explore how multimodal EFL materials informed by Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic (VAK) learning principles shaped students’ emotional engagement in an Indonesian senior high school. A qualitative case study was conducted at SMA Negeri 20 Gowa during the 2024/2025 academic year. Through purposive sampling, one Grade XI class (XI-B) was selected from approximately 180 students based on its relatively comparable English proficiency and learning characteristics. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, students’ reflective journals, and classroom documentation and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed five interconnected dimensions of emotional engagement: interest and enjoyment, confidence, motivation, active participation, and sense of belonging. Learning activities integrating visual, auditory, and kinesthetic experiences created a more interactive and supportive classroom environment, encouraging students to participate more confidently and collaboratively. Students also perceived the learning process as more enjoyable, meaningful, and relevant than conventional instruction. These findings demonstrate that VAK-informed multimodal materials can support emotionally engaging and learner-centered EFL instruction by strengthening students’ affective involvement, meaningful participation, and communicative interaction. This study contributes to the literature on emotional engagement and multimodal pedagogy by providing context-specific evidence from Indonesian secondary EFL education and offers practical implications for teachers designing inclusive instructional materials that accommodate diverse modes of learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Citation data unavailable from the configured source
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Madaminov D.Q. (2027)
    Physicochemical Analysis of Water-Soluble Sodium Silicate Obtained from Modified Raw Materials
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 128-135
  2. Kylyshkanov M. (2027)
    Innovative Adsorbent Materials for Efficient Silicon Extraction from Industrial Waters: A review
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 105-116
  3. Naemi Z. (2027)
    The Relationship between Second Language Learning Strategies, Learning Engagement, and Writing Skill in the Arabic Writing Curriculum
    Language Related Research, 17(4), 331-360

Article Details

How to Cite
Bakri, R. A., Saiful, Rahayu, & Syam, A. F. (2026). Emotional Engagement with VAK-Informed Multimodal EFL Materials among Indonesian Senior High School Learners. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 4637-4660. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.11550

References

Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Derakhshan, A., Kruk, M., Mehdizadeh, M., & Pawlak, M. (2021). Boredom in online classes in the Iranian EFL context: Sources and solutions. System, 101, 102556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102556

Dewaele, J.-M., & Li, C. (2021). Teacher enthusiasm and students’ social-behavioral learning engagement: The mediating role of student enjoyment and boredom in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 922–945. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211014538

Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2022). The predictive power of multicultural personality traits, learner emotions, and classroom environment in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 221–245.

Dewi, N., Mulyani, S., & Astuti, P. (2022). Students’ willingness to communicate in Indonesian EFL classrooms: Challenges and pedagogical implications. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 356–369.

Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles. Allyn & Bacon.

Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11(1), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.1992.tb00213.x

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students. Academic Press.

Hafner, C. A., & Ho, W. Y. J. (2020). Multimodal literacy and English language learning in digital environments. In The Routledge handbook of English language education in the digital age. Routledge.

Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2024). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289

Indriani, S., & Nur, M. (2023). Multimodal English instruction and learner engagement in Indonesian secondary schools. Journal of English Teaching, 9(2), 145–160.

Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. L. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge.

Jiang, Y., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2023). The predictive effects of classroom emotions on foreign language engagement. System, 117, 103087.

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 56/M/2022 tentang Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran.

Lim, J., & Polio, C. (2020). Multimodal composing in L2 writing classrooms: A review of empirical research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100714.

Liu, X., Chen, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). Multimodal learning environments and student engagement in English language classrooms. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11235–11256.

MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (Eds.). (2016). Positive psychology in SLA. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095360

Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024563

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Newton, P. M., & Salvi, A. (2020). How common is belief in the learning styles neuromyth, and does it matter? A pragmatic systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 5, 602451. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.602451

Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pekrun, R. (2021a). Academic emotions: Development, measurement, and implications for educational practice. Routledge.

Pekrun, R. (2021b). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2022). Student engagement. In APA handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Sato, M., & Lara, V. (2022). Peer interaction and learner engagement in second language classrooms. Language Teaching Research.

Sulistyo, G. H., Suharmanto, & Lestari, D. (2024). Digital multimodal learning and students’ engagement in Indonesian EFL classrooms. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 78–93.

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2023). Developing materials for language teaching (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, Y., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2024). Foreign language enjoyment, engagement, and classroom participation: A longitudinal study. System, 124, 103363.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zein, S., Sukyadi, D., Hamied, F. A., & Lengkanawati, N. S. (2020). English language education in Indonesia: A review of research (2011–2019). Language Teaching, 53(4), 491–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000208

Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2022). Multimodal learning in English language education: A systematic review. Educational Technology & Society, 25(4), 58–72.