Colonial Legacy and Strategic HRM in Indonesia's Civil Service: A Southeast Asian Comparison
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
4196-4214
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.11378
Viewed: 55 times
Downloaded: 32 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Johanna Novita1*, Harry Nenobais2, Sri Lalanawati Octaviani3
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Google Scholar
Abstract
Bureaucratic reform in Indonesia has substantially modernized administrative procedures; however, improvements in bureaucratic performance remain uneven, suggesting that procedural reform alone cannot resolve persistent institutional constraints. This study aimed to examine the configuration of public-sector human resource management in Indonesia through a comparative analysis of five Southeast Asian administrative systems: Hong Kong, Macau, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines. A qualitative comparative approach was employed using document analysis guided by Berman’s Strategic Human Resource Management framework and historical institutionalism. The findings indicate that Indonesia has achieved considerable procedural modernization in merit-based recruitment through the Computer Assisted Test (CAT), but these advances have not been consistently sustained in bureaucratic neutrality and performance-based compensation. The analysis identifies a pattern of asymmetrical strategic alignment in which recruitment reforms coexist with persistent organizational and institutional constraints across subsequent stages of the civil service career cycle. These constraints are rooted in historically embedded administrative routines that continue to shape authority relations, personnel management, and performance governance. The study extends Strategic Human Resource Management by demonstrating that strategic alignment is institutionally contingent rather than determined solely by the coherence of human resource policies. It concludes that sustainable civil service reform requires institutional transformation beyond procedural modernization, particularly through stronger merit-system governance, enhanced protection of bureaucratic neutrality, and the redesign of performance management toward outcome-oriented evaluation. These findings provide a comparative framework for understanding civil service reform and offer practical guidance for strengthening public-sector human resource governance in Indonesia.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Cahalan C. (2027)Aemilia Lanyer-s Optics: Luminous Bodies, Replicating Vision, and Women-s Legacy in the Dedications of Salve Deus Rex JudaeorumExplorations in Renaissance Culture, 52(1), 102-125
-
Wu Y. (2027)Strategies of Designing High-Efficiency Electrolyte Additives for Aqueous Magnesium Batteries: A ReviewNano Micro Letters, 19(1)
-
Sokolov D. (2027)Sleep and Sleepers in Aemilia Lanyer-s Salve Deus Rex JudaeorumExplorations in Renaissance Culture, 52(1), 23-53
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Alika, Y., Valentina, T. R., & Hendrik, D. (2024). Politisasi Birokrasi dalam Proses Pergantian Jabatan Birokrasi Pasca Kekosongan Jabatan Wakil Bupati Kabupaten Dharmasraya Tahun 2022. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 4(5), 1637–1654. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2279
Aprila, D., Andriani, W., & Ananto, R. P. (2023). Financial management of Nagari-owned enterprises (BUMNAG) and its impact on community welfare. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 16(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.30813/jab.v16i2.4461
Aprila, D., & Dwiharyadi, A. (2026). Big data integration in auditing: Technological, institutional, and ethical perspectives. Invoice: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 8(1), 88–102. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/invoice/article/view/21394
Aruan, C. D. (2015). HRM reform in the Indonesian civil service: Towards strategic fit? Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.008
Azam, M., & Bouckaert, G. (2025). The narrative path of Indonesian public sector reforms 1998–2023. Developments in Administration, 6(1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.46996/dina.v6i1.8985
Berman, E. M. (Ed.). (2011). Public administration in Southeast Asia: Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, Hong Kong, and Macao. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315089287
Capoccia, G. (2016). When do institutions “bite”? Historical institutionalism and the politics of institutional change. Comparative Political Studies, 49(8), 1095–1127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015626449
Cheung, A. B. L. (2005). The politics of administrative reforms in Asia: Paradigms and legacies, paths and diversities. Governance, 18(2), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00275.x
Cinar, E., Simms, C., & Trott, P. (2023). Collaborative public sector innovation: An analysis of Italy, Japan, and Turkey. Governance, 36(2), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12673
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Danar, O. R., Kusumasari, B., & Muluk, M. R. K. (2020). From phenomena to implementation: Lessons and challenges of administrative reforms in Indonesia. Public Administration Issues, (6), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2020-0-6-33-50
Hasibuan, M. S. (2026). Dinamika Politisasi Birokrasi dalam Sistem Pemerintahan di Indonesia. Komunikologi: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Komunikasi dan Sosial, 10(1), 39–51. https://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/KOMUNIKOLOGI/article/view/29810
Huque, A. S., & Jongruck, P. (2020). Civil service reforms in Hong Kong and Thailand: Similar goals, different paths. Public Administration and Policy, 23(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-03-2020-0015
Iida, K. (2024). The political economy of supply chain transformation in Asia: From “China Plus One” to de-Sinicization. Asia Policy, 19(3), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2024.a934566
Karningsih, & Wibowo, A. S. (2024). Bureaucratic reform and the enhancement of civil service performance: A literature review on the merit system policy in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 1(2), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v1i2.479
Knox, C., & Sharipova, D. (2023). Public sector reforms in developing countries: A preliminary review. Public Administration and Development, 43(5), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2030
Mahmoud, M., & Othman, R. (2021). New public management in the developing countries: Effects and implications on human resource management. Journal of Governance and Integrity, 4(2), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.15282/jgi.4.2.2021.5573
Monsod, T. C. (2017). Political appointees in the Philippine bureaucracy: Do increasing numbers help or harm? Philippine Political Science Journal, 38(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2017.1320130
Mozin, S. Y., Iba, B. T. P., Sako, I. N. A., Makalawo, A., & Hasan, B. M. (2026). Penerapan Konsep Co-Production dalam Pelayanan Publik di Kota Gorontalo. Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan Hukum, 3(2), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.62383/perspektif.v3i2.982
Mujahidin, M., & Kusuma, F. K. (2025). Redesigning bureaucracy as a governmental strategy for enhancing public service effectiveness. Society, 13(1), 803–817. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i1.766
Painter, M., & Peters, B. G. (Eds.). (2010). Tradition and public administration. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289635
Pratama, W. Y., Baihaq, M. A., & Alqorni, A. W. (2023). Phenomenon of bureaucratic politicisation during elections in Indonesia. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 9(3), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v9i3.3133
Rahmadhani, P., Apriwan, & Setyaka, V. (2023). Perubahan Kebijakan Luar Negeri Amerika Serikat dalam Mengatasi Imigran Ilegal di Perbatasan dengan Meksiko. Politics, Humanities, Laws, International Relations and Social Journal, 2(2), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.25077/palito.2.2.39-53.2023
Rahmadhani, P., Perwita, A. A. B., & Ramsi, O. (2025). Building regional readiness: Indonesia’s leadership in enhancing AHA Centre’s disaster response capabilities. International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences, 3(3), 907–928. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.6951
Rakhmawanto, A. (2020). Pengembangan Karier Aparatur Sipil Negara dalam Perspektif Perencanaan Suksesi Berbasis Merit System. Civil Service: Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen PNS, 14(1), 1–15. https://jurnal.bkn.go.id/index.php/asn/article/view/242/201
Sadikin, H., Subhilhar, & Kusmanto, H. (2022). Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara dalam Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Asahan Tahun 2020. Perspektif, 11(1), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v11i1.5639
Siddiquee, N. A., Xavier, J. A., & Mohamed, M. Z. (2019). What works and why? Lessons from public management reform in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1390762
Suminar, S. H., Perwita, A. A. B., & Ramsi, O. (2025). Hedging through defence diplomacy: Indonesia’s non-alignment in the age of emerging technologies. Asian Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Art, 3(4), 1340–1355. https://doi.org/10.58578/ajstea.v3i4.7112
Tjiptoherijanto, P. (2018). Between two cultures: Civil service reform in Thailand and Indonesia. International Relations and Diplomacy, 6(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2134/2018.02.004
Wijayanti, A. D., Augustinah, F., & Ferriswara, D. (2025). The role of bureaucratic reform in enhancing public service quality: Evidence from East Java. Journal of Governance and Public Administration, 2(3), 668–678. https://doi.org/10.70248/jogapa.v2i3.2407