Hukum dan Keadilan dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Justice in the perspective of legal philosophy towards society. Law has close relevance to justice. There are even people who hold the view that the law must be combined with justice, in order to truly mean it as a law. This is related to the response that the law is part of the human effort to create an ethical co-existence in the world. The method used is descriptive is a research method that seeks to describe and interpret objects according to what they are. This study is also often called nonexperiment, because in this study the study did not control and manipulate the research variables. In law enforcement and justice, these things should be a guide for the apparatus involved in law enforcement, especially judges as the spearhead of distributing justice to the community. First, dare to find a new path (rule breaking) and not allow yourself to be constrained by the old and traditional way of living the law, which obviously hurts the sense of justice more. Second, it is living the old and traditional law, which obviously hurts the sense of justice more. Secondly, within the capacity of each law enforcer (whether as a judge, prosecutor, investigator, advocate, experts etc.) is encouraged to always ask the conscience about the deeper meaning of the law. What do the rules of procedure, principles, doctrines, etc. mean? Third, the law should be enforced within the capacity of each law enforcement officer.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
1
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Mubdi U. (2026)
    REFORMING CIVIL COURT IN INDONESIA: THE DIALECTICS OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND DIGITAL JUSTICE
    Mimbar Hukum, 38(1), 27-57
  2. Albar R.A.H. (2026)
    TO THE OUTERMOST PARTS OF THE GALAXY: IMAGINATION’S PUISSANCE IN DECOLONIZING INTERNATIONAL LAW
    Mimbar Hukum, 38(1), 58-77
  3. Iskandar T.A.b.T.M. (2026)
    The Hukum Kanun Pahang: A Forgotten Malay-Islamic Constitutional and Maritime Legacy
    Al Shajarah, 31(1), 1-25

Article Details

How to Cite
Putrado, N. (2022). Hukum dan Keadilan dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum. AHKAM, 1(1), 116-129. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v1i1.745

References

Daiyanto, D. (n.d.). Metode Kualitatif: Penerapannya dalam Penelitian (Vol. 0).

Dwisvimiar, I. (2011). Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(3), 522–531. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.3.179

Faiz, P. M. (2017). Teori Keadilan Jhon Rawls. May 2009. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2847573

Febriansyah, F. I. (2017). Keadilan berdasarkan pancasila sebagai dasar filosofis dan ideologis bangsa. Dih jurnal ilmu hukum, 13, 1–27.

Friedman-, l. M. (1986). Law , lawyers , and popular culture. 120(1984), 1579–1606.

Kristanto, h. (2015). Keadilan organisasional, komitmen organisasional, dan kinerja karyawan. 17(1), 86–98. Https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.17.1.86

Ruman, y. S. (2012). Keadilan hukum dan penerapannya dalam pengadilan. Humaniora, 45, 345–353.

Suhardin, y. (2006). Fenomena mengabaikan keadilan dalam penegakan hukum. Mimbar hukum.

Wantu, f. M. (2011). Mewujudkan kepastian hukum, keadilan dan kemanfaatan dalam putusan hakim di peradilan perdata. 26(4), 479–490.