Putusan Kumulasi Isbat Nikah dengan Cerai Gugat Perkara Nomor 115/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Min Perspektif Istihsan bi al-Maslahah Decision on the Cumulation of Marriage Validation with a Divorce Lawsuit in Case Number 115/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Min from the Perspective of Istihsan bi al-Maslahah

Main Article Content

Miftahul Hamdi
Raymond Dantes

Abstract

The cumulation of marriage legalization and wife-initiated divorce in religious court practice has received attention in various studies, yet studies specifically discussing the application of istihsan bi al-maslahah in judges’ considerations in such cumulative cases remain limited. This study aims to analyze the judges’ legal considerations in Decision of the Maninjau Religious Court Number 115/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Min concerning the cumulation of marriage legalization and wife-initiated divorce from the perspective of istihsan bi al-maslahah. This study used a qualitative approach with a normative juridical and case study design. The main data source was Decision of the Maninjau Religious Court Number 115/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Min, which was purposively selected together with relevant legal documents and literature. The data were collected through documentation and library research, then analyzed descriptively and qualitatively through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results show that the panel of judges granted the petition for marriage legalization and wife-initiated divorce by considering public benefit, the protection of women’s rights, and the prevention of harm resulting from the unclear legal status of an unregistered marriage. These considerations reflect the application of istihsan bi al-maslahah through an orientation toward substantive justice, rather than merely the application of administrative formalities. This study contributes to the development of Islamic legal studies, particularly ushul fiqh and Islamic family law, and expands understanding of the practice of judicial ijtihad within the Religious Courts in Indonesia. Its implications include the theoretical strengthening of the concept of maqasid al-syari‘ah and the provision of practical considerations for religious courts in resolving contemporary Islamic family cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Wahyuni S. (2026)
    Cross-Border Nikah Sirri between Malaysia and Indonesia: Contemporary Legal and Social Dynamics in Borneo
    Milrev Metro Islamic Law Review, 5(1), 611-634
  2. Sukris A. (2025)
    Restorative Justice Principles in Banjar Customary Inheritance Disputes: A Normative Analysis of Out-of-Court Settlement Institutions through Adat Badamai
    El Mashlahah, 15(2), 415-436
  3. Sani A. (2025)
    Reconfiguring Electoral Design Post-Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024: Prospects for Meaningful Voter Participation
    Jurnal Konstitusi, 22(4), 828-850

Article Details

How to Cite
Hamdi, M., & Dantes, R. (2026). Putusan Kumulasi Isbat Nikah dengan Cerai Gugat Perkara Nomor 115/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Min Perspektif Istihsan bi al-Maslahah. AHKAM, 5(3), 2180-2202. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10296

References

Aini, N. (2017). Penerapan Istihsan dalam Putusan Isbat Nikah di Pengadilan Agama Yogyakarta. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 15(2), 120–135.

Al-Anshari, Z. (2016). Fath al-Wahhab bi Syarh Minhaj al-Thullab (Jilid 2). Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Qarafi, A. I. (1998). Al-Furuq (Jilid 2). Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Syathibi, A. I. (2012). Al-Muwafaqat fi Ushul al-Syari‘ah (Jilid 2). Dar Ibn Affan.

Al-Zuhaili, W. (2011). Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu (Jilid 9). Dar al-Fikr.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Handayani, F. (2019). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Perkara Isbat Nikah Perspektif Istihsan bi al-Maslahah di Pengadilan Agama Menggala. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 12(1), 45–60.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nur Fauziah, A. (2022). Pendekatan Istihsan dalam Perlindungan Hak-Hak Perempuan Pasca Perceraian. Jurnal Al-‘Adalah, 19(2), 155–170.

Pengadilan Agama Maninjau. (2025). Putusan Pengadilan Agama Maninjau Nomor 115/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Min tentang Kumulasi Isbat Nikah dan Cerai Gugat.

Rahmah, N. (2021). Kumulasi Isbat Nikah dan Cerai Gugat dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Normatif. Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 8(1), 88–102.

Republik Indonesia. (1974). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1974 Nomor 1. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/47406/uu-no-1-tahun-1974

Republik Indonesia. (1991). Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/293351/inpres-no-1-tahun-1991

Ridwan, M. (2020). Pendekatan Istihsan dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Makassar terhadap Perkara Keluarga Islam. Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 19(1), 77–94.

Rofiq, A. (2013). Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia (Edisi revisi). Rajawali Pers.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2011). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi 2). Alfabeta.

Tarigan, A. A., & Nuruddin, A. (2006). Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia: Studi Kritis Perkembangan Hukum Islam dari Fikih, UU No. 1/1974 sampai KHI. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yusuf, M. (2019). Legalitas Administratif Perkawinan dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif Indonesia. Jurnal Al-Ahkam, 29(1), 101–118.

Zed, M. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.