Promoting the Effective Use of AI in Learning: A Smart Student’s Perspective at Karl Kumm University, Vom
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
102-119
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/mjaei.v3i1.8015
Viewed: 102 times
Downloaded: 70 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Dadi Jonathan Abba1*, Adamu Ahmed Yarma2, Mafeng Jamima Dudari3
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), with its capacity to support individualized learning, efficient research, and enhanced academic productivity, has become a disruptive force in higher education. However, limited understanding, low levels of digital literacy, and ethical concerns prevent many students from harnessing AI effectively. This study examines strategies for promoting the efficient and responsible use of AI in education from the perspective of “smart students” at Karl Kumm University, Vom. Using a mixed-methods design, data were collected from 200 undergraduate students through surveys and interviews to explore AI awareness, adoption patterns, perceived benefits, and perceived challenges. The findings indicate that students recognize AI’s potential to improve learning and engagement, yet its optimal use is constrained by inadequate technical skills, fears of over-reliance, and unresolved ethical issues. The study proposes practical interventions, including mentorship schemes, curriculum integration, structured training programs, and clear ethical use guidelines, to foster more responsible and effective adoption of AI in learning. Overall, the results provide actionable insights for higher education institutions seeking to leverage AI to improve academic outcomes and to cultivate an innovative, self-directed learning culture by enabling students to become discerning and competent AI users.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Naemi Z. (2027)The Relationship between Second Language Learning Strategies, Learning Engagement, and Writing Skill in the Arabic Writing CurriculumLanguage Related Research, 17(4), 331-360
-
Yan Y. (2027)Advances in TMDs-Based Electromagnetic Wave Absorbers: From Structural Engineering to Multicomponent SynergyNano Micro Letters, 19(1)
-
Zha L. (2027)A Buried Sulfonate Molecular Bridge for Synchronous Charge Transport and Defect Passivation in High-Performance Perovskite Solar CellsNano Micro Letters, 19(1)
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Adeyemo, S. A., & Ogunyemi, A. O. (2021). Digital learning readiness and technology adoption among Nigerian university students. African Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 45–60.
Baker, R. S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 253–272). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.016
Daher, T., & Pinsonneault, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of its impacts on teaching, learning, and institutional governance. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 34–49.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/AI-in-Education.pdf
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/one-dot-com/one-dot-com/global/Files/about-pearson/innovation/open-ideas/Intelligence-Unleashed-v15-Web.pdf
Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. J. d. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 252–254). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330661
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540