Promoting the Effective Use of AI in Learning: A Smart Student’s Perspective at Karl Kumm University, Vom

Main Article Content

Dadi Jonathan Abba
Adamu Ahmed Yarma
Mafeng Jamima Dudari

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), with its capacity to support individualized learning, efficient research, and enhanced academic productivity, has become a disruptive force in higher education. However, limited understanding, low levels of digital literacy, and ethical concerns prevent many students from harnessing AI effectively. This study examines strategies for promoting the efficient and responsible use of AI in education from the perspective of “smart students” at Karl Kumm University, Vom. Using a mixed-methods design, data were collected from 200 undergraduate students through surveys and interviews to explore AI awareness, adoption patterns, perceived benefits, and perceived challenges. The findings indicate that students recognize AI’s potential to improve learning and engagement, yet its optimal use is constrained by inadequate technical skills, fears of over-reliance, and unresolved ethical issues. The study proposes practical interventions, including mentorship schemes, curriculum integration, structured training programs, and clear ethical use guidelines, to foster more responsible and effective adoption of AI in learning. Overall, the results provide actionable insights for higher education institutions seeking to leverage AI to improve academic outcomes and to cultivate an innovative, self-directed learning culture by enabling students to become discerning and competent AI users.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Artina F. (2027)
    Digital Literacy through a Web-Based Application: Addressing Polarization and Promoting Social Integration among Islamic Senior High School Students
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 51-66
  2. Prahani R.S.B.K. (2027)
    Problem-Based Learning Assisted by Physics Digital Pocket Book: Experimental Study to Enhance Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Completed with Bibliometric Analysis toward Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 15-34
  3. Mirzahosseini M. (2027)
    A Review of Constitutive Modeling of Unsaturated Soils
    Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 20(3), 81-128

Article Details

How to Cite
Abba, D. J., Yarma, A. A., & Dudari, M. J. (2026). Promoting the Effective Use of AI in Learning: A Smart Student’s Perspective at Karl Kumm University, Vom. Mikailalsys Journal of Advanced Engineering International, 3(1), 102-119. https://doi.org/10.58578/mjaei.v3i1.8015

References

Adeyemo, S. A., & Ogunyemi, A. O. (2021). Digital learning readiness and technology adoption among Nigerian university students. African Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 45–60.

Baker, R. S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 253–272). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.016

Daher, T., & Pinsonneault, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of its impacts on teaching, learning, and institutional governance. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 34–49.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/AI-in-Education.pdf

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/one-dot-com/one-dot-com/global/Files/about-pearson/innovation/open-ideas/Intelligence-Unleashed-v15-Web.pdf

Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. J. d. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 252–254). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330661

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.