Security Assessment of PIN-Based Authentication Mechanisms in Web Applications: A Penetration Testing Case Study of a Healthcare Platform in Nigeria

Main Article Content


Abstract

Healthcare web applications process sensitive operational and personal information, making secure authentication essential. This paper presents an authorized penetration-testing case study of the PIN-based administrator authentication mechanism in the development environment of MySmartMedic PHC Edition, drawing on evidence documented in an industrial training report. The assessment used controlled testing and evidence-based vulnerability reporting to examine the administrator login workflow, resistance to repeated PIN-verification attempts, and authentication token handling. The documented findings identified ineffective rate limiting and weak PIN complexity requirements. The report also recorded that successful verification using a weak PIN resulted in the application returning a valid bearer token. Together, weak PIN requirements and insufficient attempt controls could facilitate unauthorized access to an authenticated session if the reported conditions were reproducible in the assessed environment. These findings highlight the importance of layered authentication controls, server-side attempt throttling, secure token issuance and handling, and systematic security testing throughout the software development lifecycle. The case provides context-specific evidence to inform authentication security assessment in healthcare applications. Because the source material is an industrial training report rather than a controlled experiment, the findings do not establish vulnerability prevalence or statistical generalizability.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 12589.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Munisa T.A.K. (2028)
    Elemental Assessment of Lead–Bismuth Sludge from Copper Smelting with Emphasis on Tellurium Recovery
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 345(2), 44-51
  2. Sharopov K. (2028)
    Assessment of the mineral composition, microstructure, and energy properties of the sample from the Shargun coal field based on instrumental analysis methods
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 344(1), 90-98
  3. Zulkifli N. (2028)
    Purification of lanthanum chloride solution through tertiary amine extraction: thermodynamic and graded assessment
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 344(1), 28-37

Article Details

How to Cite
Abba, D. J., Sani, H. A., Chinyio, C. D., & Chinyio, D. T. (2026). Security Assessment of PIN-Based Authentication Mechanisms in Web Applications: A Penetration Testing Case Study of a Healthcare Platform in Nigeria. Mikailalsys Journal of Advanced Engineering International, 3(3), 469-478. https://doi.org/10.58578/mjaei.v3i3.12589

References

Grassi, P. A., Fenton, J. L., Newton, E. M., Perlner, R. A., Regenscheid, A. R., Burr, W. E., Richer, J. P., Lefkovitz, N. B., Danker, J. M., Choong, Y.-Y., Greene, K. K., & Theofanos, M. F. (2017). Digital identity guidelines: Authentication and lifecycle management (NIST Special Publication 800-63B). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-63b

Joint Task Force. (2018). Risk management framework for information systems and organizations: A system life cycle approach for security and privacy (NIST Special Publication 800-37 Rev. 2). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-37r2

Jones, M., & Hardt, D. (2012). The OAuth 2.0 authorization framework: Bearer token usage (RFC 6750). RFC Editor. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC6750

OWASP Foundation. (n.d.-a). Application security verification standard. https://asvs.owasp.org/

OWASP Foundation. (n.d.-b). Web security testing guide. https://owasp.org/projects/web-security-testing-guide

OWASP Foundation. (2021). OWASP Top 10: The ten most critical web application security risks. https://top10.owasp.org/2021/

Uniccon Group of Companies. (2026). Internal security operations procedures and vulnerability reporting documentation [Internal organizational documents].