Governing the Digital Border: A Systematic Review of Interoperability, Accountability and Institutional Coordination in Immigration Information Systems
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
513-536
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ajstea.v4i4.9905
Viewed: 0 times
Downloaded: 0 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Muridi Makame Abdalla1, Diana Rwegasira2, Mahadia Tunga3*
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The global transition toward e-governance has transformed immigration administration by strengthening border security, improving service efficiency, and facilitating interagency coordination. Developed economies across Europe and Asia have implemented integrated Immigration Information Systems (IIS) that combine real-time data, biometrics, and interoperable digital frameworks to manage migration securely and accountably. Nevertheless, substantial disparities persist between developed and developing countries because of limited interoperability, insufficient capacity, institutional fragmentation, and data-security concerns. This study systematically reviews peer-reviewed literature published from 2015 to 2025 to examine how interoperability, accountability, and institutional coordination can be achieved through IIS. Guided by PRISMA principles, the review synthesizes evidence from empirical studies, policy frameworks, and international case studies, focusing on technological, semantic, and organizational interoperability. It also examines accountability mechanisms related to system security, transparency, data quality, regulatory compliance, and governance arrangements spanning agencies and national borders. The findings indicate that although the literature frequently prioritizes technological interoperability, semantic alignment and strong organizational interoperability are essential for effective and sustainable system integration. Their achievement depends on clear legal mandates, robust governance structures, and effective interagency collaboration. Integrated systems in the European Union, Estonia, and Singapore demonstrate the potential of IIS to accelerate processing, strengthen security, and improve policy coherence, whereas many developing countries remain constrained by institutional, human-capacity, and infrastructural limitations. The review proposes a unified framework integrating interoperability, accountability outcomes, and institutional coordination. By synthesizing a fragmented body of scholarship and identifying critical research gaps, it provides evidence-based guidance for policymakers and system architects developing secure, accountable, and interoperable immigration information systems.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Mirzahosseini M. (2027)A Review of Constitutive Modeling of Unsaturated SoilsIranian Journal of Geophysics, 20(3), 81-128
-
Kusuma N.A. (2027)Exploring the acceptance of science teachers toward simulator-based technologyMultidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
-
Roy K.R. (2027)miRNA-mRNA multi-omics integration in breast cancer stagingAdvances in Biomarker Sciences and Technology, 9(1), 70-82
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Aden, H. (2020). Interoperability between EU policing and migration databases: Risks for privacy. European Public Law, 26(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2020006
African Union. (2023). AU digital transformation strategy (2020–2030): Progress report and implementation framework. African Union Commission.
Akbar, P., Nurmandi, A., Irawan, B., & Loilatu, M. H. J. (2022). Research trends in e-government interoperability: Mapping themes and concepts based on the Scopus database. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 14(2), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v14i2.707
Ally, A. K., & Otieno, C. (2020). The influence of information technology systems on the performance of integrated border management in East Africa. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 8(1), 79–88. https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/the-influence-of-information-technology-system-on-performance-of-integrated-border-management-in-east-africa
Arifin, R. (2020). Assessing border control management of immigration control at airports in Indonesia: A theoretical and empirical study [Master’s thesis, Flinders University]. https://flex.flinders.edu.au/items/9aba4f11-9ced-4128-b327-9bf7243f4896/1
Arya, A., Nardon, L., & Riyadh, M. D. (2022). Information and communication technology in migration: A framework for applications, customization, and research. Ryerson Centre for Immigration and Settlement. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.06611
Benton, M., Davidoff-Gore, S., Batalova, J., Huang, L., & Zong, J. (2022). COVID-19 and the state of global mobility in 2021. International Organization for Migration. https://publications.iom.int/books/covid-19-and-state-global-mobility-2021
Berg, C. (2024). Interoperability. Internet Policy Review, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2024.2.1749
Berg, T. (2024). Interoperability challenges in large-scale public-sector information systems: Evidence from migration and border management systems. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1).
Bindemane, S., Arbidane, I., & Mietule, I. (2018). Information systems used in immigration control structural units: Analysis of their operational effectiveness and capabilities in Latvia. Border Security and Management, 2(7), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.17770/bsm.v2i7.3491
Blasi Casagran, C. (2021). Fundamental rights implications of interconnecting migration and policing databases in the EU. Human Rights Law Review, 21(2), 433–457. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaa057
Bozorgmehr, K., McKee, M., Azzopardi-Muscat, N., Bartovic, J., Campos-Matos, I., Gerganova, T. I., Hannigan, A., Janković, J., Kállayová, D., Kaplan, J., Kayi, I., Kondilis, E., Lundberg, L., de la Mata, I., Medarević, A., Suvada, J., Wickramage, K., & Puthoopparambil, S. J. (2023). Integration of migrant and refugee data in health information systems in Europe: Advancing evidence, policy and practice. The Lancet Regional Health—Europe, 34, Article 100744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100744
Brouwer, E. (2020). Large-scale databases and interoperability in migration and border policies: The non-discriminatory approach of data protection. European Public Law, 26(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2020005
Čižiūnienė, K., Prokopovič, M., Zaranka, J., & Matijošius, J. (2024). Biometric breakthroughs for sustainable travel: Transforming public transportation through secure identification. Sustainability, 16(12), Article 5071. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125071
Concas, S., Kummetha, V. C., & Staes, L. (2024). Mobility data—Standards and specifications for interoperability (Report No. 0267). Federal Transit Administration. https://www.transit.dot.gov/research-innovation/mobility-data-standards-and-specifications-interoperability-report-0267
Duić, D., & Rošić, M. (2022). Interoperability between the EU information systems—from an idea to realisation. Policija i sigurnost, 31(2), 118–148.
Dumbrava, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence at EU borders: Overview of applications and key issues. European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_IDA%282021%29690706
Efthymiou, M. (2025). Airport security. In J. D. Nelson, C. Mulley, & S. Ison (Eds.), Elgar encyclopedia of transport and society (pp. 50–51). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035330522-00029
European Border and Coast Guard Agency. (2021). Interoperability assessment programme 2019–2020. Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.frontex.europa.eu/publications/interoperability-assessment-programme-2019-2020-report-gE6dct
European Commission. (2021). Report on the state of play of preparations for the full implementation of the interoperability regulations. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52021DC0688
European Commission. (2023). State-of-play report on digital public administration and interoperability 2023. https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/news/2023-10/State-of-play%20report%202023.pdf
European Migration Network. (2021). Status report 2021.
European Parliament, & Council of the European Union. (2019). Regulation (EU) 2019/817 establishing a framework for interoperability between EU information systems in the field of borders and visas. Official Journal of the European Union, L 135, 27–84. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R0817
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. (2023). ENISA threat landscape 2023. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2023
European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. (2022). Interoperability of EU large-scale IT systems: 2022 progress report. Publications Office of the European Union.
Gregory, J. (2023). Assessing the impact of e-services on the delivery of quality immigration services in Kilimanjaro Region [Master’s dissertation, Institute of Accountancy Arusha].
Hanzlik, L., & Kutyłowski, M. (2021). Security requirements and risk mitigation in national identity and border management systems. Computers & Security, 105.
Ibor, A., Hooper, M., Maple, C., Crowcroft, J., & Epiphaniou, G. (2025). Considerations for trustworthy cross-border interoperability of digital identity systems in developing countries. AI & Society, 40(4), 2729–2750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02008-9
Ibor, U. I., Offiong, A. I., & Etta, E. (2023). Accountability and trust in integrated border management information systems. Information Polity, 28(2), 145–161.
International Organization for Migration. (2020). IOM migration data strategy: Informing policy and action on migration, mobility and displacement 2020–2025. https://publications.iom.int/books/iom-migration-data-strategy-informing-policy-and-action-migration-mobility-and-displacement
Jones, C. (2020). Automated suspicion: The EU’s new travel surveillance initiatives. Statewatch. https://www.statewatch.org/media/1235/sw-automated-suspicion-full.pdf
Khan, N., & Efthymiou, M. (2021). The use of biometric technology at airports: The case of customs and border protection. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 1(2), Article 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2021.100049
Khoury, C., & Hendow, M. (2025). Advances in border management: Digitalisation trends and emerging technologies. International Centre for Migration Policy Development. https://www.pragueprocess.eu/en/resources/repository/61-publications/516-advances-in-border-management-digitalisation-trends-and-emerging-technologies
Kimolo, L. P., & Casmir, R. (2024). Evaluating the efficacy of the e-immigration system in the provision of immigration services in Tanzania. African Journal of Empirical Research, 5(4), 1871–1880. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.4.156
Kipingu, M. K., & Shayo, D. P. (2021). Technology and immigration system: A new paradigm for improving government service delivery in Tanzania. PanAfrican Journal of Governance and Development, 2(2), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.46404/panjogov.v2i2.3231
Krimmer, R., Solvak, M., Alishani, A., Dedovic, S., Schmidt, C., & Castle, S. (2022). European interoperability landscape report 2022: Public report. Nordic Institute for Interoperability Solutions. https://www.niis.org/niis-publications/2022/6/23/report-european-interoperability-landscape-report-2022
Mwakwabe, M. (2023). Assessment of adoption and utilization of ICT systems in the public sector in Tanzania: A case of the Immigration Department, Ministry of Home Affairs [Master’s dissertation, Institute of Accountancy Arusha]. http://dspace.iaa.ac.tz:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2693
Nguyen, T. (2021). Establish an online immigration service [Bachelor’s thesis, Laurea University of Applied Sciences].
Nsaghurwe, A., Mtebe, J. S., & Raphael, C. (2021). Challenges of integrating government information systems in developing countries: Evidence from immigration and border agencies. Information Development, 37(4), 602–617.
OECD. (2021). Digital government review: Strengthening digital transformation in the public sector. OECD Publishing.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Paiva, A. M., & Gonçalves, S. P. (2023). Harmonising migration: An analysis of points-based systems [Master’s thesis, Universidade Católica Portuguesa].
Qureshi, S. (2007). Information technology innovations for development. Information Technology for Development, 13(4), 311–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20080
Salgado, L., & Beirens, H. (2023). What role could digital technologies play in the new EU Pact on Migration and Asylum? Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/mpi-europe/publication/what-role-could-digital-technologies-play-new-eu-pact-migration-and-asylum
United Nations. (2022). E-government survey 2022: The future of digital government. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://desapublications.un.org/publications/un-e-government-survey-2022
United Nations Development Programme. (2023). Digital public infrastructure and inclusive digital transformation.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2015). Policy on the protection of personal data of persons of concern to UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/what-we-do/data-and-publications/data-and-statistics/data-protection
United Republic of Tanzania. (2023). National ICT policy. Ministry of Information, Communication and Information Technology.
Varastika, D., Wijaya, M. E., Aurelie, M. S. C., Handayani, P. W., & Fitriani, H. (2025). Mobile passport success in Indonesia based on the DeLone–McLean information systems success model. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 20, Article 100251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100251
Vogt, L., Strömert, P., Matentzoglu, N., Karam, N., Konrad, M., Prinz, M., & Baum, R. (2024). FAIR 2.0: Extending the FAIR guiding principles to address semantic interoperability [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.03345
Walsham, G., Symons, V., & Waema, T. (1988). Information systems as social systems: Implications for developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 3(3), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.1988.9627126
Wang, C., Huang, R., Li, J., & Chen, J. (2020). Towards better information services: A framework for immigrant information needs and library services. Library & Information Science Research, 42(1), Article 101000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.101000
World Bank. (2022). GovTech maturity index, 2022 update: Trends in public-sector digital transformation. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/10b535a7-e9d4-51bd-96ed-6b917d5eb09e
World Customs Organization. (2021). Coordinated border management compendium (Updated ed.).
Yildiz, M., & Küpper, A. (2025). Digital border management and interoperability architectures. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 40(1), 1–18.
Zeng, M. L. (2019). Interoperability. Knowledge Organization, 46(2), 122–146. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2019-2-122