Social Media Utilisation in Institutional Communication: A Conceptual Analysis
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
1937-1954
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ajstea.v3i6.7997
Viewed: 180 times
Downloaded: 208 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Chiakaan Jacob Gbaden1, Happiness Dah Robert2
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Social media has fundamentally transformed institutional communication, reshaping how organisations construct meaning, engage stakeholders, and sustain legitimacy. This conceptual paper examines the utilisation of social media in institutional communication, with particular emphasis on tertiary institutions, by drawing on the Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT) and the Diffusion of Innovations Theory (DOI) to integrate audience-centred and innovation-centred perspectives on institutional adoption and user engagement. The analysis argues that social media has disrupted traditional, top-down communication models and enabled participatory, dialogic interactions that foreground transparency, immediacy, and co-creation. It identifies critical conceptual shifts from managerial to relational communication, from episodic to continuous engagement, and from closed to permeable communicative environments, while highlighting the ethical, strategic, and governance implications of these transformations. Particular attention is given to developing contexts such as Nigeria, where uneven institutional digital capacities and regulatory frameworks shape the dynamics of social media use in tertiary institutions. The paper contends that social media now constitutes a core dimension of institutional identity and legitimacy, thereby demanding new theoretical, methodological, and professional orientations. It concludes by outlining future research directions, including comparative studies, digital legitimacy assessments, and critical examinations of artificial intelligence in institutional communication, thereby advancing a holistic framework for understanding social media’s evolving role in institutional discourse and underscoring the need for adaptive communication theories and practices in a networked public sphere.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Buasen J.A. (2027)Institutional underspending in a state university: Managerial constraints and implications for organizational developmentMultidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
-
Fazeli F. (2027)The representation of the properties of the social actors in the two poetries of“Aghadar”and “Fokhos”written by Sheevan Foumani in accordance with the socio-semantic model and semio-semantic analysisLanguage Related Research, 17(4), 397-431
-
Kusuma N.A. (2027)Exploring the acceptance of science teachers toward simulator-based technologyMultidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Breakenridge, D. (2012). Social media and public relations: Eight new practices for the PR professional. FT Press.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
Ezeah, G. H., Asogwa, C. E., & Edogor, I. O. (2013). Social media use among students of universities in South-East Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(9), 1–10.
Fawkes, J. (2015). Public relations ethics and professionalism: The shadow of excellence. Routledge.
Fuchs, C. (2017). Social media: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Sage.
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Sage.
Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321–334.
Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251.
Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353.
Okoro, N., & Nwafor, K. A. (2013). Social media and political participation in Nigeria during the 2011 general elections: The lapses and the lessons. Global Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3), 29–46.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Shao, G. (2009). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research, 19(1), 7–25.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.
Waters, R. D., & Jamal, J. Y. (2011). Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ Twitter updates. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 321–324.
Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362–369.