Analisis Perbandingan KBK (Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi), KTSP (Kurikulum Berbasis Sekolah), dan Kurikulum 2013

Main Article Content

Riris Sugianto

Abstract

This study aims to discuss the comparison between KBK, KTSP and Curriculum 2013 where there are many criticisms of the government's proposal to radically change the elementary school curriculum into six subjects: mathematics, Indonesian language, religious studies, Pancasila, sports, and arts. However, critics have put forward some very weak arguments and fail to see how the proposed curriculum will help Indonesia – far more effectively than it currently is – build a first-class education system. One good a priori reason to think that the government is right and the critics wrong is that the proposed curriculum is very similar to the curriculum taught in primary schools in England and is universally admired in education circles around the world. The reason why basic English education is so admired for wanting a basic education: to develop children's curiosity and curiosity and encourage critical thinking and creativity by not burdening them with too many set subjects but using the available time to integrate teaching according to various topics. In classes where children are ostensibly studying mathematics or English or religion or art, they are at the same time exposed to knowledge of the world around them and their social and physical environment, a broad understanding of specific periods in history. , moral ideas, and awareness of their own potential. All of this takes place in a context where children learn to take responsibility for their own learning through discovery and investigation, reading, asking questions, watching video clips, utilizing IT resources, libraries, and educational classroom aids (CW Watson, 2012).

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
2
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Citing Documents
Crossref
  1. Salsabilla Putri Diana Edison et al. (2025)
    Interactive E-Modules in Life Science to Foster Scientific Literacy and Process Skills in Early Childhood
    Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha, 13(3), 491
  2. M. Zaenul Muttaqin (2026)
    Bourdieu, Neoliberalism and Higher Education Policy in Indonesia
    SpringerBriefs in Education, 59
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Ricaldi Echevarria M.L. (2026)
    Educational inequalities in academic performance in secondary education in Peru: a multilevel analysis
    Praxis Educativa, 21
  2. Toscano Aznar L. (2026)
    Neurosyphilis: descriptive analysis of clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes
    Enfermedades Infecciosas Y Microbiologia Clinica, 44(8)
  3. Xue C. (2026)
    Depression symptom profiles and associated sociodemographic factors among perinatal women: A latent profile analysis
    Atencion Primaria, 58(9)

Article Details

How to Cite
Sugianto, R. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan KBK (Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi), KTSP (Kurikulum Berbasis Sekolah), dan Kurikulum 2013. YASIN, 2(3), 351-360. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v2i3.416

Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.