Hubungan Efikasi Diri dengan Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa The Relationship Between Self-Efficacy and Academic Cheating Among Students

Article Sidebar

Page Numbers: 1048-1062
Download PDF
Published: Aug 23, 2024
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/masaliq.v4i5.3761
Save this to:
Article Metrics:
Viewed : 33 times
Downloaded : 19 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (0.00)
Connected Papers:
Connected Papers

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you would like to obtain more information about the submission process or if you have further questions.

Authors:
Monica Annurianti1, Dina Sukma2
Copyright :

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.


Main Article Content

Monica Annurianti
Universitas Negeri Padang
Dina Sukma
Universitas Negeri Padang

Abstract

This study aims to describe self-efficacy and academic dishonesty among students in the X program cohort of 2021-2023, and to identify the relationship between self-efficacy and academic dishonesty in these students. The research is a descriptive correlational quantitative study. The sample consists of 216 students from the X program cohort of 2021-2023, selected using the incidental sampling method. Data collection was conducted through questionnaires on self-efficacy and academic dishonesty among the students. The collected data were analyzed using statistical analysis techniques and tested with the Spearman's rho correlation formula. The results of this study indicate that: (1) The level of self-efficacy in the X program cohort of 2021-2023 is in the very low category, with a percentage of 75.93%. (2) The level of academic dishonesty in the X program cohort of 2021-2023 is in the very high category, with a percentage of 41.20%. (3) Correlation analysis shows a significant and negative relationship between self-efficacy (variable X) and academic dishonesty (variable Y) among students in the X program cohort of 2021-2023, with a correlation coefficient (r) of -.775 and a significance level of 0.000.

Keywords:
Self-efficacy; Academic Dishonesty; Students
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:







Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Annurianti, M., & Sukma, D. (2024). Hubungan Efikasi Diri dengan Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa. MASALIQ, 4(5), 1048-1062. https://doi.org/10.58578/masaliq.v4i5.3761

Creative Commons License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

References

Anderman. (2007). Psychology of Academic Cheating. London: Academic Press, Inc.
Asyari, M. . (2021). Hubungan Antara Efikasi Diri dengan Kecurangan Akademik pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi UIN.
Bintoro, W., Purwanto, E., & Noviyani, D. . (2013). Hubungan Self Regulated Learning dengan Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa. Educational Psychology Journal, 2.
Damayanti, V. ., & Savira, S. . (2022). Hubungan Efikasi Diri, Kesiapan Belajar Siswa dengan Kecurangan Akademik pada Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 9.
Farahian, M., Parhamnia, F., & Avarzamani, F. (2020). Plagiarisme dalam tesis : Kekhawatiran nasional dari sudut pandang instruktur universitas.
Feist, J., & Gregory, J. . (2010). Teori Kepribadian (Edisi ketujuh). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Ghufron. (2010). Teori-teori Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Harahap, M., Netrawati, N., Nirwana, H., & Hariko, R. (2022). Efektivitas Konseling Kelompok dengan pendekatan REBT untuk mengurangi perilaku menyontek siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 8.
Hartanto, D. (2012). Bimbingan & Konseling Menyontek: Mengungkap Akar Masalah dan Solusinya. Jakarta: Penerbit Indeks.
Nurfadhilla, N. (2020). Upaya Meningkatkan Efikasi Diri Melalui Layanan Bimbingan Konseling. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling Islam), 3(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.32505/enlighten.v3i1.1495
Pramudyastuti, O. L., Fatimah, A. N., & Wilujeng, D. S. (2020). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi: Investigasi Dimensi Fraud Diamond. Journal of Economic, Management, Accounting and Technology, 3.
Prayitno, & Amti. (2004). Dasar-Dasar Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Purnamasari, D. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa. Educational Psychology Journal, 2(1), 13–21
Solihat, W. M., Hermawan, Y., Roro, R., Nurdianti, S., Ekonomi, J. P., & Siliwangi, U. (2023). Global Education Pengaruh Tekanan , Kesempatan , Rasionalisasi , Kemampuan , dan Arogansi terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Pendidikan Ekonomi. Global Education Journal, 1.
Sopiyan, S., Salsabilla, D., Sarah, J., & Fitriana, N. (2022). Accounting Student Academic Fraud Behavior: Dimensions of Diamond Fraud. Bilancia: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 6.
Sukma, D. (2018). Concept and application group guidance and group counseling base on Prayitno’s paradigms. Konselor, 7.
Tohirin. (2009). Bimbingan dan Konseling Sekolah dan Madrasah. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo.
Yudiana, A. P. . (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi (Studi Empiris Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Trisakti). Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 4.