Evaluasi Program Pendidikan di SMK PGRI 7 Surabaya Evaluation of Education Programs at SMK PGRI 7 Surabaya

Crossmark

Article Sidebar

Page Numbers: 1492-1501
Download PDF
Published: Apr 3, 2024
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/tsaqofah.v4i3.2857
Save this to:
Save to Mendeley Download RIS

Article Metrics:
Viewed: 568 times
Downloaded: 334 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (USD 0.00)
Check for article on SINTA:

LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers

Connected Papers:
Connected Papers


Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.


Authors:
Balqis Hadrianingtyas1, Nesha Aisyah2, Sheila Zhulhijjah3, Kaniati Amalia4
Copyright :

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.

Explore Our Journals
Find the journal that best fits your research. If this journal does not match your manuscript’s scope, explore our portfolio below to select a more suitable publication venue.

Main Article Content

Balqis Hadrianingtyas
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Nesha Aisyah
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Sheila Zhulhijjah
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Kaniati Amalia
Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Abstract

Minister of National Education Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 Year 2007 regarding education assessment standards describes that educational assessment is a process of collecting and processing information to assess students' learning achievements. At SMK PGRI 7 Surabaya, a teacher conducts evaluation to assess students' performance in carrying out their tasks. This research uses a qualitative approach, conducting interviews and participatory observation, as well as recording data in the form of audio recordings, images, and field notes. The research results indicate that SMK PGRI 7 Surabaya implements the Final Summative Assessment Program (PSAJ) only in grade 12. The purpose of this program is to evaluate all aspects of assessment at the end of the educational level. PSAJ evaluation is conducted by the school, and the results are determined by the school itself. However, there are several issues related to the implementation of PSAJ, such as the lack of standard values, difficulties in motivating learning, and recruiting special guidance teachers (GPK).

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Lukpanov R.E. (2027)
    Evaluation of the Effect of Additives on the Workability of Concrete Mix as Part of a Study of a Modified Wall Block
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 342(3), 100-110
  2. Shionoya K. (2027)
    Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Biopsy With Simplified Macroscopic On-site Evaluation (With Video)
    Den Open, 7(1)
  3. Irawati R. (2027)
    Enhancing accounting students’ writing performance through problem-based learning: Evidence from a vocational higher education context
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Hadrianingtyas, B., Aisyah, N., Zhulhijjah, S., & Amalia, K. (2024). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan di SMK PGRI 7 Surabaya. TSAQOFAH, 4(3), 1492-1501. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v4i3.2857

Creative Commons License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

References

Adinda, Ade Hera, Hossiana Ekklesia Siahaan, Inas Fawaz Raihani, Naurah Aprida, Niken Fitri, and Ade Suryanda. (2021). Penilaian Sumatif Dan Penilaian Formatif Pembelajaran Online. Report Of Biology Education 2(1):1–10.
Anjani, Anisa, Desi Fitriani, Mega Dwi Kaputri, Istiyati Mahmudah. (2021). Efektivitas Penggunaan Google Form Sebagai Media Evaluasi Saat Penilaian Tengah Semester (PTS). Jurnal Seminar Pendidikan Nasional Jurusan Tarbiyah FTIK 49–59.
Baidowi, Baidowi, Dwi Novitasari, Sri Subarinah, Ratih Ayu Apsari, and Ni Made Intan Kertiyani. (2021). Pendampingan Perencanaan, Pengelolaan Dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Bagi Guru Matematika SMK Kota Mataram. Rengganis Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat 1(2):156–68. doi: 10.29303/rengganis.v1i2.96.
Diana, Ayu, and RatnaSari. (2023). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jurnal Studi Islam Indonesia (JSII) 1(1):157–66.
Febriana, Rina. (2021). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta.
Gunawan, Imam. (2011). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (1):1–13.
Hasyim, M. (2014). Penerapan Fungsi Guru Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Auladuna 1(2):265–76.
Jumaeda, St. (2022). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Di Madrasah Aliyah Negeri Ambon. Al-Iltizam: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 7(1):83. doi: 10.33477/alt.v7i1.3040.
Kemendikbud. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan RI Nomor 34 Tahun 2018 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan/ Madrasah Aliyah Kejuruan.
Kemendikbud. (n.d). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi Nomor 21 Tahun 2022 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, Dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah.
Laeli, Umi Isna Nur. (2023). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Di MA Ma’arif NU 1 Cilongok Banymas.
Lailatul Mufidah, Kukuh Tejomurti. (2021). Evaluasi Pendidikan Islam. 7(3):6.
Magdalena, Ina, Nurul Hidayati, Ratri Hersita Dewi, abgi Wulan Septiara, and Zahra Maulida. (2023). Pentingnya Evaluasi Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Dan Akibat Memanipulasinya. MASALIQ Jurnal Pendidikandan Sains 3(September 2023):810–23.
Mardinah, Astuti. (2022). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Muhammad, Surur. (2024). Penilaian Sumatif Akhir Jenjang.
Munthe, Ashiong P. (2015). PENTINGYA EVALUASI PROGRAM DI INSTITUSI PENDIDIKAN: Sebuah Pengantar, Pengertian, Tujuan Dan Manfaat. Scholaria : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan 5(2):1. doi: 10.24246/j.scholaria.2015.v5.i2.p1-14.
Oktavia, Linda Sari, Nurhidayati, and Nurhizrah Gistituati. (2021). Kebijakan Pendidikan: Kerangka, Proses Dan Strategi. JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) 6(1):95. doi: 10.29210/3003909000.
Purnawanto, Ahmad Teguh. (2022). Perencanaan Pembelajaran Bermakna Dan Asesmen Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Ilmiah Pedagogy 20(1):75–94.
Qadafi, M., A. Sumarni, A. Dina. (2023). Pemenuhan Standar Nasional Pendidikan Melalui Pelaksanaan Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal Di Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 6 Batang Hari. Pendidikan Islam 04(02):8–18.
Qodir, Abdul. (2017). Evaluasi Dan Penilaian Pembelajaran. Yogya.
Semarang, SMK 8. (2023). Penilaian Sumatif Akhir Jenjang Tematik Integratif Representasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. SMK 8 Semarang. Retrieved (https://smkn8semarang.sch.id/berita-337-penilaian-sumatif-akhir-jenjang-tematik-integratif-representasi-kurikulum-merdeka-belajar-smk-n-8-se.html).
Sri Wahyuningsih, and Fadriati. (2022). Kesepakatan Etik Dan Interpersonal Dalam Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Al-Fahim : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam 4(1):58–72. doi: 10.54396/alfahim.v4i1.224.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>