Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

This research was motivated by the low learning motivation of class V students at SDN 05 Batu Taba. This type of research is correlational research with a quantitative approach. The population in this study was all 20 class V students at SDN 05 Batu Taba. The sampling technique used is a saturated sampling technique, where all members of the population are sampled. Data collection techniques include questionnaires, tests, documentation. The results of the research show that there is no positive relationship between learning motivation and Pancasila education learning outcomes for class V students at SDN 05 Batu Taba, Tanah Datar Regency. This is proven by the calculated t value being smaller than the t table, namely 1.54 < 1.734 so that H0 is accepted and H1 is rejected.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Ratnaningsih E. (2027)
    Designing a Data-Driven E-Learning Module for Teaching English to Young Learners: Integrating Needs Analysis and the ISAV Learning Model
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 269-286
  2. Unyaphatariyakool S. (2027)
    Science Teachers’ Learning Management Competency through Professional Learning Communities to Promote Scientific Creativity and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 241-252
  3. Trisnowati E. (2027)
    Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and Research Skill Development (RSD) in Science Education in Higher Education: A Delphi-Based Model
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(2), 253-268

Article Details

How to Cite
Sari, D. P., & Waldi, A. (2024). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Pancasila Peserta Didik Kelas V SDN 05 Batu Taba, Kabupaten Tanah Datar. ALSYS, 4(5), 596-603. https://doi.org/10.58578/alsys.v4i5.3637

References

Amin, N. F., Garancang, S., & Abunawas, K. (2023). Konsep Umum Populasi dan Sampel dalam Penelitian. Jurnal Pilar, 14(1), 15–31.
Dewi, N. P. C. P. (2022). Analisis Buku Panduan Guru Fase A Kelas I Kurikulum Merdeka Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila pada Jenjang Sekolah Dasar. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.55115/edukasi.v3i2.2475
Disriani, R., & Habibi, M. (2023). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar Siswa terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v5i1.4242
Fimala, Y., & Miaz, Y. (2020). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. E-Journal Inovasi Pembelajaran SD, 8(3), 1–10.
Indriyani, T., & Gumala, Y. (2020). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3(2), 524–532. https://journal.uii.ac.id/ajie/article/view/971
Iswati dan Muslich Anshori, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif.
Mudanta, K. A., Astawan, I. G., & Jayanta, I. N. L. (2020). Instrumen Penilaian Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Mimbar Ilmu, 25(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v25i2.26611
Prasetya, A., Kuryanto, M. S., & Hilyana, F. S. (2023). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas Iv Sd 1 Mijen Kaliwungu Kota Kudus. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(1), 5052–5061. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v8i1.8714
Rahmi, A., & Waldi, A. (2023). Hubungan Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Pancasila Bagi Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar Islam Terpadu Kota Padang. 11, 633–644.
Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Tindakan.