Critical Review and Reality of Religious Moderation in Law and Legal Frameworks in Indonesia
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ajstea.v1i2.2259
Viewed : 159 times
Downloaded : 97 times
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you would like to obtain more information about the submission process or if you have further questions.
Abstract
This article aims to conduct a critical review of the role of religious moderation in the context of legislation and the legal framework in Indonesia. Through in-depth analysis, this article investigates the impact of legislative changes on the implementation of religious moderation and its relevance in building a strong and effective legal framework to support harmony in diversity in Indonesia. This research uses qualitative methods with content analysis techniques, namely reviewing and analyzing a number of literature related to the subject matter using a document analysis approach to examine laws and regulations related to religious moderation in Indonesia. Document analysis is used to analyze the text of legislative regulations by understanding their substance, objectives and impact on religious moderation. Meanwhile, literature study is understanding the views and concepts of religious moderation from academic, religious and societal perspectives. The reality in the field regarding the challenges of implementing religious moderation, critical analysis of the legal framework and the relationship between law and social reality are some of the results of critical analysis and findings that can be used as references in viewing and understanding religious moderation in the context of Indonesian society.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Abdullah, M. Z. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Undang- Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2003 jo Undang- Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Dalam Hubungan Dengan Hak Azasi Manusia. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 13(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v13i1.246
Abstrak. (2023). Penanganan Konflik Social. https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/index/id/267
Admin. (2023). Landasan Hukum Persatuan dan Kesatuan Bangsa. Tribratanews Polda Kepri. http://polri.go.id
Bardi, A. (2023). Pengaturan Kualifikasi Terorisme Dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Dan Perbandingannya Dengan Negara Lain. Jatiswara, 38(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v38i1.484
Bhat, P. I. (2019). Idea and methods of legal research. Oxford University Press.
Budianto, A. (2020). Legal research methodology reposition in research on social science. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9(1), 1339–1346.
Daniealdi, W. T. (2023). KERANGKA KERJA PENANGGULANGAN TERORISME DI INDONESIA DALAM MENGHADAPI METAMORFOSA ANCAMAN TERORISME. Kajian, 27(2), 141–154.
Eskridge Jr, W. N., & Peller, G. (1990). The new public law movement: Moderation as a postmodern cultural form. Mich. L. Rev., 89, 707.
Evans, S., & Saunders, C. (2009). Overlap, Inconsistency, Conflict and Choice: Reconciling Multiple Norms in the Australian Federation. Judge Made Federalism?, 131–162.
Fahri, mohammad, A. zainuri. (2022). Moderasi Beragama di Indonesia Mohamad. Religions, 13(5), 451. http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/intizar/article/download/5640/3010/
Ghumman, S., Ryan, A. M., Barclay, L. A., & Markel, K. S. (2013). Religious discrimination in the workplace: A review and examination of current and future trends. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 439–454.
Gifford, D. G., Reynolds, W. L., & Murad, A. M. (2012). A Case Study in the Superiority of the Purposive Approach to Statutory Interpretation: Bruesewitz v. Wyeth. SCL Rev., 64, 221.
Haniyah, H. (2022). Konsep dan Implementasi Moderasi Beragama dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Proceedings of Annual Conference for Muslim Scholars, 6(1), 812–817. https://doi.org/10.36835/ancoms.v6i1.423
Hukum, F., Komputer, U., No, J. D., & Bandung, K. (2022). THE FRAMEWORK FOR COMBATING TERRORISM IN INDONESIA IN FACING THE METAMORPHOSIS OF THE TERRORIST THREAT Abstrak Dalam perkembangan lingkungan kea- manan internasional dua dekade terakhir , tero- risme telah menjelma menjadi salah satu ben- tuk isu keamanan. 141–154.
Jin, Q., Raza, S. H., Yousaf, M., Munawar, R., Shah, A. A., Hassan, S., Shaikh, R. S., & Ogadimma, E. C. (2022). Ingraining polio vaccine acceptance through public service advertisements in the digital era: The moderating role of misinformation, disinformation, fake news, and religious fatalism. Vaccines, 10(10), 1733.
Jubba, H., Awang, J., & Sungkilang, S. A. (2021). The challenges of Islamic organizations in promoting moderation in Indonesia. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya, 6(1), 43–54.
Kementerian Sekretariat Nagara RI. (2023). Perpres No.58 Tahun 2023 tentang Penguatan Moderasi Beragama .Jakarta:Kementerian Sekretariat Negara RI. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/265185/perpres-no-58-tahun-2023
Keputusan menteri Agama. (2022). Nomor 93 tahun 2022 tentang Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Penguatan Moderasi Beragama bagi pegawai Negeri Sipil Kementerian Agama.
Keputusan Menteri Agama. (2020). Nomor 328 Tahun 2020 Tentang Kelompok Kerja Penguatan Program Moderasi Beragama Pada Kementerian Agama. https://ikhub.id/produk/kebijakan-nasional
M. Dahri. (2017). Tindak Pidana Penodaan Agama di Indonesia; Tinjauan Pengaturan Perundang- Undangan dan Konsep Hukum Islam. Journal of Islamic Law, 1(2), 27. http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/attafahum/article/view/958
Mukhibat, M., Nurhidayati Istiqomah, A., & Hidayah, N. (2023). Pendidikan Moderasi Beragama di Indonesia (Wacana dan Kebijakan). Southeast Asian Journal of Islamic Education Management, 4(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.21154/sajiem.v4i1.133
Pajarianto, H., Pribad, I., & Sari, P. (2022). Tolerance between religions through the role of local wisdom and religious moderation. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 78(4).
Penjelasan Penetapan Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1965 tentang Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan dan/atau Penodaan Agama. (1965).
Peraturan Pemerintah. (2021). Nomor. 7 Tahun 2021 Tentang Rencana Aksi Nasional Pencegahan Dan Penanggulangan Ekstremisme Berbasis Kekerasan Yang Mengarah Pada Terorisme. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/157948/perpres-no-7-tahun-2021
Presiden RI. (1999). Presiden RI, “Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang HAM. Pub. L. No. 165, 23 September 1999 (n.d.), 2. https://www.komnasham.go.id/.
Presiden RI. (2023). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 58 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penguatan Moderasi Beragama,. https://smartid.co.id/blog/2023/10/02.
Sachedina, A. (2001). The Islamic roots of democratic pluralism. Oxford University Press.
Sekretariat Jendral dan Kepaniteran Mahkamah Kostitusi. (2007). Buku Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Dan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Pub. L. No. 2008. www.mahkamah kostitusi.go.id.
Sintaresmi, P., Muchsin, S., & Ahmadi, R. (2022). IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG - UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG PENANGANAN KONFLIK SOSIAL (Studi Kasus Pencegahan Konflik Sosial Di Kota Probolinggo). Jurnal Academia Praja, 5(1), 56–72.
Suryantoro. (n.d.). Badan Kesatuan Bangsa Dan Politik Kabupaten Kulon Progo; Moderasi-Beragama-Memperkuat-Kerukunan-Umat-Beragama-Di-Kabuapten-Kulon-Progo. https://kesbangpol.kulonprogokab.go.id/detil/615.
Tatang Guritno, D. P. (2021). Kapolri : 370 Tersangka Teroris Ditangkap Sepanjang-2021. Kompas. https://nasional.kompas.com.
Van Der Kroef, J. M. (1952). Society and culture in Indonesian nationalism. American Journal of Sociology, 58(1), 11–24.
