Pengujian Diskresi Pejabat Pemerintah oleh PTUN
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
879-894
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v2i4.2323
Viewed: 249 times
Downloaded: 179 times
We cordially invite qualified professionals to join LYAS Publisher as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will contribute significantly to maintaining the quality of our publications. If you are interested, please complete the following form: Call for Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need more information about the submission process or have any further questions.
Authors:
Sentia Indah1, Aldri Frinaldi2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to determine how the PTUN tests the discretion of government officials by means of normative legal research methods. So, that it could be concluded that’s discretion had Law no. 30 of 2014 regarding Government Management. Meanwhile, for discration decisions that are deemed to be violations or discrepancies announced by government bodies or officials, administrative settlement processes, administrative appeals and lawsuits can be carried out in court. Where, the use of discretion may be exercised by government officials while still exercising it for several government officials, then the testing of discretion by the PTUN against government officials is based on various specific reasons, and the discretion exercised by government officials must be accountable.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Ansori, L. (2015). Diskresi Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pemerintah Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. Jurnal Yuridis, 2(1), 135-150.
Arbani, T. S. (2019). Penggunaan dan Batas Diskresi Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah Di Indonesia. Widya Pranata Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum, 1(2), 176-187.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2004). Format Kelembagaan Negara dan Pergeseran Kekuasaan Dalam UUD 1945. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.
Ashfiya, D. G. (2023). Dis kursus Pergeseran Konsep Diskresi Pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Dan Pengujiannya Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 6(1), 57-88.
Asyikin, N. (2020). Freies Ermessen Sebagai Tindakan Atau Keputusan Pemerintah Ditinjau Dari Pengujiannya. DIVERSI: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 184-209.
Atmosudirjo, Prajudi. (1994). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Penerbit: Ghalia Indonesia.
Erliyana, A. (2004). Keputusan presiden: analisis Keppres RI 1987-1998. Program Pascasarjana, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Indonesia.
Hadi, I. G. A. A., & Apsari, G. A. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Pejabat Pemerintahan Dalam Tindakan Diskresi Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Kertha Patrika, 39(01), 33-46.
Hadjon, Phillipus m (et al), (1999). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Muhsin, M. S. (2019). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Diskresi Oleh Pejabat Pemerintahan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Lex Administratum, 7(3).
Maulana, R. A. (2022). Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Diskresi Pejabat Eksekutif Pemerintah Indonesia: Studi Kasus Ratu Atut Chosiyah. Supremasi Hukum, 18(01), 84-91.
Ridwan, HR. (2010). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Ridwan, HR. (2010).Diskresi Dan Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Soekanto, Soerjono.(1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Tobrani, R. (2018). Pengujian Keputusan Oleh Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Diskresi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pejabat Pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 13(1), 102-117.
Ulya, Z. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Pejabat Pemerintahan dalam Menetapkan Diskresi (Studi terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016). Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 24(3), 412-430.
Undang – Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.
Yudhi, Setiawan. (2017). Hukum Administrasi Pemerintahan Teori Dan Praktik. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Find the perfect home for your research! If this journal isn't the right fit, don't worry—we offer a wide range of journals covering diverse fields of study. Explore our other journals to discover the ideal platform for your work and maximize its impact. Browse now and take the next step in publishing your research:
| HOME | Yasin | AlSys | Anwarul | Masaliq | Arzusin | Tsaqofah | Ahkam | AlDyas | Mikailalsys | Edumalsys | Alsystech | AJSTEA | AJECEE | AJISD | IJHESS | IJEMT | IJECS | MJMS | MJAEI | AMJSAI | AJBMBR | AJSTM | AJCMPR | AJMSPHR | KIJST | KIJEIT | KIJAHRS |