Comparing Lecture and Discussion Methods: Assessment of Perception of Medical Laboratory Science Students at Sultan Abdurrahman School of Health Technology Gwadabawa, Nigeria

Page Numbers: 48-56
Published
2024-01-14
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/ijhess.v2i1.2561
Save this to:
Article Metrics:
Viewed : 56 times
Downloaded : 55 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (0.00)

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you would like to obtain more information about the submission process or if you have further questions.




  • Yusuf Yahaya Miya Galaxy College of Health Technology Bauchi, Nigeria
  • Anas Yusuf Sultan Abdurrahman School of Health, Nigeria

Abstract

Medical Laboratory Science skilled workers are needed at hospital and other settings more than ever. These workers are produced by schools through teaching and learning. Medical Laboratory scholars are on many occasions involved in training and teaching. Nevertheless, nowadays teaching is been centered towards the views of learners, thus the aim of those study was to compare lecture and discussion teaching methods among students at Medical Laboratory Science Department at Sultan Abdurrahman School of Health Technology Gwadabawa with a view to select better learning method. A survey of 60 participants using a semi-structured questionnaire was done and descriptive statistics aided the analysis. Best teaching method selected by the respondents was the lecture method (100.0%); while none of them (0.0%) submitted discussion method as the method they want in learning Medical Laboratory Science. Advantages or reasons for choosing lecture method than the discussion method as submitted by the respondents are stated. The most frequently stated was "Less cost (30.0%)" then, " No tedious efforts from students in understanding lectures (26.7%)" "Give room for more research (16.7%)," " No anxiety (13.3%), " "Give room for rehearsal (8.3%)" and " Teacher give important points (5.0%)". The disadvantages of discussion (presentation) method are: Some students are in anxiety (33.3%), time consuming (25.0%), students may have limited knowledge (20.0%), students spend more money (16.7%), and some students may easily not contribute (5.0%). Thus, lectures are suitable and better ways of making Medical Laboratory Science students that will become technicians and relations.

Keywords: Lecture Method; Discussion Method; Medical Laboratory Science; Learning; Teaching; Hospital

Citation Metrics:






Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
Miya, Y. Y., & Yusuf, A. (2024). Comparing Lecture and Discussion Methods: Assessment of Perception of Medical Laboratory Science Students at Sultan Abdurrahman School of Health Technology Gwadabawa, Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences, 2(1), 48-56. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijhess.v2i1.2561

References

Ahmad, F., Waheed, S. A., & Gilani, N. (2023). Procedural Requirements: Storied Experiences of Doctoral Students after Submission of Dissertation. Journal of Education & Humanities Research (JEHR), 15(1), 136-146.
Diamandis, E.P. (2002). Duties and responsibilities of laboratory scientist. Clinical Chimica Acta, 319,111-115.
Isabel, J.M. (2010). Preparing clinical laboratory science students with teaching skills. Clinical Laboratory Practice, 23(3),3-13.
Kaur, G. (2011). Study analysis of lecture model of teaching. International Journal of educational Planning and Administration, 1(1),9-13.
Miya, Y.Y., Dambam, S.A., Abdulkareem, J.H., Sarkingobir, Y., & Yabo, A.M (2023). Anxiety Effect On Students and Performance in Biology: A Case Study Among Secondary Schools in Sokoto City, Nigeria. International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching, 7(1), 1-8.
Nwaeze, E.U.C., Onuaha, R.C., Ukogo, I. (2016). Innovative teaching methods in Science Education for junior secondary school basic science students. Journal of Teacher Perspective, 11(2),1-10.
Obeta, MU., Maduka, K.M., Ofor, I.B., & Ofojekwu, N.M.J. (2019). Improving quality and cost diminution in modern healthcare delivery: The role of the Medical Laboratory Scientists in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 8(3),08-19.
Okoro, R.U.& Haruna, M.J. (2006). Introduction to principles and practice of education for NCE and undergraduate students. But-Bass Educational Books, Sokoto, Nigeria.
Roy, S. (2022). Teaching methods and strategies. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research,9(11),496-500.
Sanda, A.A. & Mazila. E.A. (2017). The effect of lecture and discussion methods of teaching on learners performance in social studies in continuing education institution Borno state, Nigeria. Frontiers of Knowledge Journal Series International Journal of Education and Educational Research,1(1),1-40.
Sanusi, R.S. (2016). Role of medical laboratory science in maternal and child health- A review. Bayero Journal of Medical Laboratory Science,1(1),102-112.
Sarkingobir, Y. (2023). Exploratory Study On Selected Heavy (Lead, Cadmium, Chromium, Nickel, Zinc, Iron) And Non-Heavy Metals (Sodium, Potassium, Calcium, Magnesium) In Popular Substances/Drugs (Cigarette, Cannabis Alcohol, And Cough Syrup) Abused/Used by Youth in Sokoto Metropolis, Sokoto State, Nigeria. A Doctor of Philosophy Submitted at The Department of Public Health Crown University Int’l Chartered Inc. In Santa Cruz in Argentina: Rio Gallegos, Santa Cruz, Argentina.
Sarkingobir, Y., Waheed, S.A., Abubakar, M., & Gilani, N. (2023). Plastic waste materials in a classroom environment: An assessment of nursery classes in Sokoto state, Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Social Science, 43(2), 217-226.
Waheed, S. A., Gilani, N., Raza, M., & Sharif, S. (2022). Understanding Students' Experiences of Lived Space in Schools: A Phenomenological Perspective. Journal of Research and Reviews in Social Sciences Pakistan, 5(2), 1764-1776.
Waheed, S.A., Gilani, N., & Noor, N. (2021). Newly inducted and experienced teaches working relationships: what can they learn from each other?. Global Sociological Review, 6(1), 23-30.