Representation of Muna Language Wisdom in Nature Conservation: An Ecolinguistic Perspective
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
154-160
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ijhess.v2i2.2879
Viewed: 296 times
Downloaded: 272 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Hadirman Hadirman1* 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to provide language wisdom in the form of expressions in preserving the natural environment. This research reveals how these communities care for and treat natural resources, especially rivers and sacred forests, in the context of environmental and cultural sustainability. This research method uses a qualitative descriptive approach. The research results show that the Muna people have a close connection with nature, where they consider rivers and sacred forests as spiritual heritage that must be well protected. Traditional rules that protect water sources and holy forests are the basis for the Muna people in maintaining ecological balance and avoiding actions that could damage the natural environment. Verbal expressions in the Muna language also reflect local wisdom values related to the natural environment, such as the prohibition of cutting trees around rivers or sacred forests.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Asrif, N F N. (2017). Pengaruh Mitos Imbu terhadap Pelindungan Alam Laut Kepulauan Wakatobi. Kandai 11 (1): 84–98.
Baru, Yosefina. (2016). Leksikon Nama Orang pada Etnis Miyah: Kajian Ekolinguistik. Kibas Cenderawasih 13 (1): 43–50.
Hadirman. (2022). Konsep, Metode, dan Aplikasi. Edited by Hardin. Surabaya: CV. Kanaka.
Januariawan, I Gede. (2021). Fungsi Kearifan Lokal dalam Menjaga Kelestarian Lingkungan Hidup di Desa Penglipuran. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu 5 (3): 130–43.
Lestari, Alif Putra, Sri Murtini, Bambang Sigit Widodo, and Nugroho Hari Purnomo. (2021). Kearifan Lokal (Ruwat Petirtaan Jolotundo) dalam Menjaga Kelestarian Lingkungan Hidup. Media Komunikasi Geografi 22 (1): 86–97.
Mardikantoro, Hari Bakti. (2016). Satuan Lingual Pengungkap Kearifan Lokal dalam Pelestarian Lingkungan. Bahasa Dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni dan Pengajarannya 44 (1): 47–59.
Nurdiyanto, Erwita, Gita Anggria Resticka, and Sri Nani Hari Yanti. (2022). Ekoleksikon Burung Merpati sebagai Suplemen Pembelajaran Bahasa Berbasis Lingkungan: Perspektif Ekolinguistik. SEMIOTIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Sastra Dan Linguistik 23 (1): 1–13.
Permana, Raden Cecep Eka, Isman Pratama Nasution, and Jajang Gunawijaya. (2011). Kearifan Lokal tentang Mitigasi Bencana pada Masyarakat Baduy. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia 15 (1): 67–76.
Putra, Setia, and Erdianto Effendi. (2017). Kearifan Lokal Budaya Suku Sakai terhadap Sumber Daya Perairan di Kabupaten Bengkalis. Riau Law Journal 1 (1): 1–14.
Sastrawan, Gede Arma. (2023). Kajian Ekologi Lingkungan dalam Upacara Ngelukat Gumi. Pramana: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian 3 (1): 93–100.
Selvia, Lena, and Sunarso Sunarso. (2020). Keberagaman Hubungan Budaya antara Suku Dayak dan Suku Banjar di Kalimantan. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya 22 (2): 208–16.
Suryanto, Edy, Sumarwati Sumarwati, Atikah Anindyarini, and Hadiyah Hadiyah. (2024). Cerita Rakyat sebagai Sarana Berliterasi Kearifan Lokal: Pendekatan Ekologi Sastra. Indonesian Language Education and Literature 9 (2): 328–41.