Strategi Membangun Kepercayaan terhadap Lembaga Kepolisian melalui Pendekatan Sosio Institusional Komperatif
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
73-94
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v1i1.736
Viewed: 307 times
Downloaded: 377 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Muhtadin Muhtadin1 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The police need the public's trust to do their job well. Recognizing this, police organizations across Europe are applying a variety of methods to gain trust or trust-building strategies. In its implementation, trust in the police and the legitimacy of the police pay less attention to what the police do to increase trust. In this regard the author will outline an approach to understanding strategies for building police trust in their social and institutional contexts by applying a comparative and dynamic perspective. Illustrating the value of a socio-institutional approach to trust-building strategies, each of these phases is discussed in the context of a comparative and dynamic study of police trust building strategies in England and Wales, Denmark, and the Netherlands. It is said that a more sophisticated understanding of building trust in its social and institutional context not only tells us something about the police, but also helps us understand how state institutions shape and maintain their position in the complex environment of our changing society.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Crank, J. P., & Langworthy, R. (1992). Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Institutional Perspective on Policing AN INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE OF POLICING. J. Crim. L. & Criminology THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY, 83(2). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc
de Maillard, J., Hunold, D., Roché, S., & Oberwittler, D. (2018). Different styles of policing: discretionary power in street controls by the public police in France and Germany. Policing and Society, 28(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2016.1194837
Goldsmith, A. (2005). Police reform and the problem of trust. Theoretical Criminology, 9(4), 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480605057727
Goldsmith, A. J. (1991). Complaints against the Police : A “Community Policing” Perspective. The Police and the Community in the 1990s., 205–218.
Gourley, D. (2015). Police Relations. 135–142.
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., & Murray, K. (2012). Compliance with the law and policing by consent: Notes on police and legal legitimacy. Legitimacy and Compliance in Criminal Justice, 29–49. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203113998
Kingdon, G., & Knight, J. (2007). Unemployment in South Africa, 1995-2003: Causes, problems and policies. Journal of African Economies, 16(5), 813–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejm016
Kort, J. (n.d.). strafrechtspleging. 77(1), 6–10.
Lee, M., & McGovern, A. (2013). Force to sell: Policing the image and manufacturing public confidence. Policing and Society, 23(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2011.647913
Marcelo, J., Institutions, R. De, Ideas, O., Scott, I. D. W. R., Paulo, S., & Scott, D. W. R. (2009). Disponível em: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=155113814011.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Reiner, R. (2013). Who governs? Democracy, plutocracy, science and prophecy in policing. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 13(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895812474282
Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41(5), 885–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507080443
Schaap, D., & Scheepers, P. (2014). Comparing Citizens’ Trust in the Police Across European Countries: An Assessment of Cross-Country Measurement Equivalence. International Criminal Justice Review, 24(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567714524055
Schaap, H., & de Bruijn, E. (2018). Elements affecting the development of professional learning communities in schools. Learning Environments Research, 21(1), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9244-y
Skogan, W. G. (2009). Concern about crime and confidence in the police: Reassurance or accountability? Police Quarterly, 12(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611109339893
Terpstra, J., & Trommel, W. (2009). Police, managerialization and presentational strategies. Policing, 32(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510910937157
Tyler, T. R., & Wakslak, C. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 42(2), 253–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00520.x