Anotasi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Nomor 110/G/KI/2019/PTUN.BDG dan Implikasinya terhadap Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

This research is to examine the basis for the consideration of the panel of judges at the Bandung State Administrative Court, which has decided on a dispute application. Information about the inspectorate audit report as information that is open to the general public. Disclosure of public information is one of the important elements for the realization of good governance or Good Governance in the administration of government. The purpose of this paper is the first to describe the judge's considerations in the decision of the Bandung State Administrative Court in Deciding Case Number: 110/G/KI/2019/PTUN.BDG Regarding Public Information Disclosure Disputes, the second is sanctions against State Administrative Officials who do not implement decision No.110/G/KI/2019/PTUN.BDG. This research is juridical normative oriented to legal analysis of the reality of the application of legal norms contained in various laws on public information disclosure in the decisions of the Bandung State Administrative Court. Sources of legal materials are based on primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Primary legal materials are in the form of various decisions of the State Administrative Court and secondary legal materials.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Selvaraj M.K. (2026)
    Evaluating the evolutionary relationship of TATA binding protein (TBP) with various folding patterns of protein domains using support vector machine (SVM)
    Scientific Reports, 16(1)
  2. Gambarino S. (2026)
    Analytical validation of a high-resolution melting assay for UGT1A1 TATA-box polymorphisms
    Molecular Biology Reports, 53(1)
  3. Kaur S. (2026)
    Electric vehicles as a pathway to India’s sustainable development goals
    Discover Sustainability, 7(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Darusman, H. (2022). Anotasi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Nomor 110/G/KI/2019/PTUN.BDG dan Implikasinya terhadap Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara. AHKAM, 1(1), 130-147. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v1i1.746

References

Amal, Ichlasul. Armawi, A. (1996). Keterbukaan Informasi dan Ketahanan Nasional. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Arto, M. (2004). Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama. Pustaka Pelajar.

Baehr, P. (2001). Instrumen Internasional Pokok HAM. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Dwiyanto, A. (2005). Mengapa Pelayanan Publik Mewujudkan Good Governance. UGM Press.

Lotulung, P. E. (2013). Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Kekuasaan. Penerbit Salemba Humanika.

Mangkoedilaga, B. (2001). Lembaga Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Ghalia Indonesia.

Santosa, P. (2008). Administrasi Publik:Teori dan Aplikasi Good Governance. Revika Aditama.

Subagiyo, H. (2009). Anotasi Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik. Komisi Informasi RI.

Sumarto, H. S. (2003). Inovasi, Partisipasi Dan Good Governance. Obor Indonesia.

Wasistiono, S. (2003). Kapita Selekta Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah. Fokus Media.